Issue26,请大家指点一下~~[公告]
Issue26Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served.（627）
Architecture is a symbol of civilization. It was not only a solid matter but also reacted to the behaviour and the fundamental ideology of the people in the era that the architecture was built. In view of the angle to respect the people’s working with wisdom and the significant position in researching on the culture in the past, we should preserve the historical building in their own place. Albeit quite reasonable, fierce controversy are arouse for some modern designers believe that it will frustrate the whole beauty from the general design of urbanization.
As far as I am concerned, to preserve the historic architecture is the unload obligation to modern man. We should not betray our primogenitor for the seek that to comfort ourselves. History is one of the most crucial evidence that prove the development of our human being currently. That no doubt is our duty to heritage other than a discussible problem we should engage.
To retrospect the tens of thousands of years that human civilization founded, the feature of architecture is the most truthful victim of our development. From these remnants, we could understand the daily life of the people in that time, and also, though the marvelous and sophisticated designing, could we know something that could not be discovered from books, hieroglyphs or some other things recorded as characters and symbols. Such as the astronomy phenomenon, Based on the observation and study of anthropologist and the calculation of the astronomer, great things reviewed that the three most famous pyramid in Egypt directly point the three main stars of Orion——a constellation that could help people predict the flood of River Nile. On the contrary, if we build new one just for the coherent of aesthetics and vanished the past one, we even could not make explanation to our descendant. For that less evidence could prove the former existence and history become an episode one by one without conjunction.
The structure of building in ancient time also provider now people a new way to comprehended their belief and religion, which guided and ruled their society. Some old cities such as Roma and Frankfurt, when developing new buildings, not only cared the imprint of history, but also took its surround as grant in order to make it as a whole. In some contrary to the issue, some new city such as New York, with little history but also prefers to rebuild some churches and monuments that satisfied their psychological feeling with their history.
In the other hand, and if, sometimes even the architecture has little meaning for our research, we should also make an available cost price evaluation in order to make it worthy to rebuild, in which contain the cost on resource material, land of building, and the expense for migrating people from their former in order to help them could afforded a new one in other place.
Admittedly, it not seems that under no circumstance should we not destroy the old one and build new instead. Such as the grand position in Manhattan, and Wangfujing District in Beijing, serve as a commercial center and no others could substitute its own status for the contemporary people. With the superior geographic position, far more benefits could create than its own value. With the advancement, world will continuing and perpetuating.
Generally, take one thing to another, with different concept toward the society and the difference in apperceiving the science and social phenomena, it’s not a conscious action that preserve all buildings with history. It would be drafted and declined in the past for things lead into extremity will commence a new catastrophe. Everything we could done is to adjusted its individual superiority and on this condition, spend our omnipotent power to formulate our history more completely.
谁有什么更好的例子吗？~~ Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served.（627）
Architecture is a symbol of civilization. It was not only a solid matter but also reacted to the behaviour and the fundamental ideology of the people in the era that （when）the architecture was built. In view of the angle to respect the people’s working with wisdom and the significant position in researching on the culture in the past, we should preserve the historical building in their own place. Albeit quite reasonable, fierce controversy are arouse for （among）some modern designers believe （believing）that it （这个it离指代的太远了）will frustrate the whole beauty from the general design of urbanization.
As far as I am concerned, to preserve the historic architecture is the unload （什么意思？不懂） obligation to modern man. We should not betray our primogenitor for the seek that to comfort ourselves （seek是动词吧，这句话不通阿）. History is one of the most crucial evidence that prove the development of our human being currently （去掉）. That no doubt is （is no doubt）our duty to heritage （这是个名词，而且继承什么？）other than a discussible problem we should engage （+in）.（这一段是表明stance了，是第一句么？汗~~~~）
To retrospect the tens of thousands of years that human civilization founded（创立文明是瞬间的，怎么又是几万年的呢？）, the feature of architecture is the most truthful victim of our development. From these remnants （relics）, we could understand the daily life of the people in that time（哪个时间？）, and also, though （though后面跟从句，怎么跟短语？）the marvelous and sophisticated designing, could （为何倒装？）we know something that could not be discovered from books, hieroglyphs or some other things recorded as characters and symbols. Such as the astronomy phenomenon, Based on the observation and study of anthropologist （和人类学家有什么关系？）and the calculation of the astronomer, great things （什么意思？）reviewed that the three most famous pyramid （复数）in Egypt directly point the three main stars of Orion——a constellation that could help people predict the flood of River Nile.（金字塔指向Orion的三颗星？什么意思?举例至少要说明问题吧） On the contrary, if we build new one just for the coherent （用名词）of aesthetics and vanished （有使动吗？） the past one, we even could not make explanation （做什么解释？） to our descendant. For that less evidence could prove the former existence （什么的存在？）and history become an episode one by one without conjunction. 这段说历史建筑的价值。
The structure of building in ancient time also provider （类似词性的错误太多）now （又来一个，now能修饰people?） people a new way to comprehended （去ed） their belief and religion, which guided and ruled their society. Some old cities such as Roma （Rome）and Frankfurt, when developing new buildings （城市能做develop的主语？）, not only cared the imprint of history, but also took its （their） surround as grant in order to make it as a whole. In some contrary to the issue（on the contrary）, some new city （单复！！）such as New York, with little history but also prefers to rebuild some churches and monuments that satisfied their psychological feeling with their history. （这段论证感觉和TS对不起来）
In the other hand, and （这个and用的莫名其妙） if, sometimes even （也很唐突，毕竟你重起一段，和前面没多大关系了）the architecture has little meaning for our research（明白了，是把if，even并为even if 吧）, we should also make an available cost price （什么意思？成本价估算？）evaluation in order to make it worthy to rebuild, in which （这个从句是跟哪儿的阿？如果是跟成本估算的，in不要，有contain了） contain the cost on resource material, land of building, and the expense for migrating people from their former in order to help them could （去掉）afforded （原形） a new one in other place.
（这段看不太懂啊，历史建筑如果对研究没意义，我们为什么还要重建呢，还罗列了一大帮要考虑的问题，为了论证什么？至少你也要说出另外的需要重建的理由）
Admittedly, it not seems that under no circumstance should we not destroy the old one and build new instead. （连续三个否定，我晕）Such as the grand position in Manhattan, and Wangfujing District in Beijing, serve as a commercial center and no others could substitute its own status for the contemporary people. （上面这句是破句阿，单独的such as能做主语嘛?）With the superior geographic position, far more benefits could create than its own value. With the advancement, world will continuing and perpetuating. （什么的advancement? 后面这半句也是病句阿）
Generally, take one thing to another, with different concept toward the society and the difference in apperceiving the science and social phenomena, it’s not a conscious action that preserve all buildings with history. It would be drafted and declined in the past for things lead into extremity will commence a new catastrophe. Everything we could done （？？）is to adjusted （？？） its individual superiority and on this condition, spend our omnipotent power to formulate （on + ing）our history more completely.
谁有什么更好的例子吗？~~
说实话你的文章低级问题可真多阿，可能你自己没有好好检查，大多数问题自己都应该看的出来的。这样让人看真的蛮累的 :o
例子不必了多了，金字塔，罗马，（还有Paris Louvre Palace不知是不是这样拼）包括中国也有不少，长城，故宫都可写。你这样也够了。只是论证上还不是对的很准，如果让我来写的话，我可能采取call for a balance的写法更好写一点）
页:
[1]