issue 235 （思想哲学）郁闷没人砸
Issue 235 Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.Loyalty is one of the most admirable virtues throughout generations. However, it is also the heat target blamed by the pioneer thinkers. Why does loyalty arose the distinctive difference? I believe the reason is there are two kinds of loyalty: rational faith and the blind fealty.
As for the rational loyalty, it will make the world better, for it create a trustful atmosphere. When someone is loyal to friends or other individuals, he or she will appear warm and trustful. There are numerous psychological evidences that trust will lead to the sense of security, which is the critical catalyzer for friendship. Meanwhile loyalty is also important for a group, a company and even a country. Because on the one hand when an individual is faithful to his group, he will put all his heart on it, taking its goal as his, its threats as his own, its development as his success. On the other hand, standing on the position of a leader, loyalty keeps a group stable, which is the most indispensable factor for the group's survival. In fact, rational loyalty in itself is based on the sense of responsibility. The loyal people will do anything for the ultimate happiness of the people and the groups through their careful judgment and even fight against the mistakes of those to who they show loyalty.
On the contrary to the rational loyalty, blind loyalty is one of the most destructive force to both individuals and groups. A plenty of examples have show the miserable tragedies by the blind loyalty. Although these stories appear quite different on the surface, which are in different countries, various occupations and different generations, all of them repeated the same topic. The heroes or the heroines are definitely faithful to their beloved lovers or groups. So they do everything they can do to help their loyal figures and totally obey them. However, unfortunately, they often conduct some illegal behaviors to show their faith, although they know the aftermath of their actions, usually with the drastically conflict between conforming to loyalty and law. Although they are the popular and everlasting themes in the movies, which will embody thoroughly the complicated human nature and the vulnerability of human being, they are realistically not a virtue we should pursue to. The blind loyalty is unconditional submission to the loyal figures and also the fealty that put passion and strong emotion ahead of the laws and other social rules.
All in all, we advocate the rational loyalty that is based on responsibility within the scope of laws and social contracts. When people are taught to be faithful, they should be also taught how to discriminate the differences between right and wrong, virtue and evil. They should develop the sense of responsibility as well as the legal awareness as a citizen. At last, let's all of us live in a mutual trustful and careful world.
Re: issue 235 （思想哲学）郁闷没人砸
Issue 235 Most people are taught that loyalty is a virtue. But loyalty-whether to one's friends, to one's school or place of employment, or to any institution-is all too often a destructive rather than a positive force.Loyalty is one of the most admirable virtues throughout generations. However, it is also the heat target blamed by the pioneer thinkers. Why does loyalty arose the distinctive difference? I believe the reason is there are two kinds of loyalty: rational faith and the blind fealty.观点很新颖
As for the rational loyalty, it will make the world better, for it create a trustful atmosphere. When someone is loyal to friends or other individuals, he or she will appear warm and trustful. There are numerous psychological evidences that trust will lead to the sense of security, which is the critical catalyzer for friendship. Meanwhile loyalty is also important for a group, a company and even a country. Because on the one hand when an individual is faithful to his group, he will put all his heart on it, taking its goal as his, its threats as his own, its development as his success. On the other hand, standing on the position of a leader, loyalty keeps a group stable, which is the most indispensable factor for the group's survival. In fact, rational loyalty in itself is based on the sense of responsibility（这种新的见解最好解释一下）. The loyal people will do anything for the ultimate happiness of the people and the groups through their careful judgment and even fight against the mistakes of those to who（whom） they show loyalty.
On the contrary to the rational loyalty, blind loyalty is one of the most destructive force to both individuals and groups. A plenty of examples have show the miserable tragedies by the blind loyalty. Although these stories appear quite different on the surface, which are in different countries, various occupations and different generations, all of them repeated the same topic. The heroes or the heroines are definitely faithful to their beloved lovers or groups. So they do everything they can do to help their loyal figures and totally obey them. However, unfortunately, they often conduct some illegal behaviors to show their faith, although they know the aftermath of their actions, usually with the drastically conflict between conforming to loyalty and law. Although they are the popular and everlasting themes in the movies, which will embody thoroughly the complicated human nature and the vulnerability of human being, they are realistically not a virtue we should pursue to. The blind loyalty is unconditional submission to the loyal figures and also the fealty that put passion and strong emotion ahead of the laws and other social rules. （你想分两类loyalty来写，但好象对其区分标准不甚清楚，而且这个例子不好）
All in all, we advocate the rational loyalty that is based on responsibility （within the scope of laws and social contracts注意这是你前面没论述过的，最好不要出现在结论里，或者你要在前面提一下理性和盲目的区别就是是否符合法律和社会准则，但我并不认为这是好的分类标准）. When people are taught to be faithful, they should be also taught how to discriminate the differences between right and wrong, virtue and evil. They should develop the sense of responsibility as well as the legal awareness as a citizen. At last, let's all of us live in a mutual trustful and careful world.
不好意思，可能我过分苛求，但这只是我的个人意见
这个题很老但我觉得不好写，让牛人们来看看吧
good luck! Why does loyalty arose（应是arouse） the distinctive difference?
A plenty of examples have show（应是shown） the miserable tragedies
At last, let's（let´s=let us，所有后面的all of us就不对了） all of us live in a mutual trustful and careful world.
song刚才评论说“你前面没论述过的，最好不要出现在结论里，或者你要在前面提一下理性和盲目的区别就是是否符合法律和社会准则”，这点我也很同意。不过我想如果你没法在短时间内让自己的思维变的非常深刻的话，这个理由也够了，可以拿来做论据。只是要注意铺陈。
这些都是前人写过的同题作文，你看看对你有没有用
https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/search.php?s=&action=showresults&searchid=162583&sortby=lastpost&sortorder=descending 谢谢paisley的建议，也谢谢 song，我想你修改我这篇文章一定花了不少时间吧,你说的有一定道理,不过先看了SONG的建议，还有的死脑筋，及其困难的去给RESPONSIBILITY赋予一个操作定义，想了20分钟，也没想好，后看了phoebuswang的文章，发现只要从积极和消极两方面来写，就可以避开这个难题。
不过song，我觉得我的例子没有错，只不过没有阐述清楚，我不应该写Although they are the popular and everlasting themes in the movies, which will embody thoroughly the complicated human nature and the vulnerability of human being, they are realistically not a virtue we should pursue to. 这一句，有点跑题，其实稍微简述一个生活中的例子就行了，如丈夫公司资金周转不灵，在国企中作财务的妻子挪用公款来解救，结果两个人都吃了官司。
不过还有个问题，paisley,我觉得arouse也可以，但具体分不清arise和arose的区别。
页:
[1]