自己总结的一些argu错误，发上来与大家共享。
肯定很不完整，大家跟贴补充啊 :DI survey:
1.1 The quantity of the sample: if the participants are of small scale (the proportion, not the number of them), the result of the survey is not representative.
1.2 The procedure of the survey: randomness, if the participants are confined in a certain group the survey cannot represent the whole.
1.3 The result of the survey: makes no sense, the result is common sense.
1.4 The participants of the survey: if they are being forthright when asked?
II false analogy
2.1 attack on the possible difference between two things. The location, the weather, the economic conditions, the preference, etc.
2.2 incomplete comparisons (selective comparison): focus on fractional parts of two things while ignores the rest. A has a larger amount of customers than B but ignore the economic conditions of the customers.
III hasty generalization
3.1 A is successful in parts of B but not be applicable to the whole of B.
3.2 A is successful now but not be the same in the future.
3.3 A is successful to the majority but not to the minority.
IV credibility of the evidence
4.1 the speaker may be related to the company
4.2 there may exist hidden things behind the phenomenon
4.3 the feasibility of the evidence
V false dilemma
5.1 choose A or B, but ignore other alternatives
VI incomplete thought
6.1 only focus on the advantage while ignore the disadvantage
6.2 only focus on the benefits while ignore the costs
6.3 only focus on the quantity while ignore the quality
VII cause and effect
7.1 other reasons
7.2 concurrences.
7.3 confuse cause and effect 好人啊！感谢分享！ 谢谢分享。 分享一下！感谢！ hehe,东西不少。。。
昨天又仔细看了看pp3中的帮助：
ets并不要求你会这些术语，不要求你有过专门得逻辑训练，只要你能发现问题，发现作者的推理思路，然后根据推理得顺序或是问题得轻重提出其他的能够推翻其推理的可能的解释就行了（好像这句话有点英文式中文的味道，呵呵），所以嘛。。。
呵呵，还是谢谢！ 谢谢分享.
谢谢啦
收了。 TKS
页:
[1]