issue87 jingjing（kito）有拍必回，请留下你的链接！
TOPIC：ISSUE 87 - "In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries."WORDS：766 TIME：0:58:00 DATE：2006-1-30
提纲：平衡观点
1 新手总是怀疑和挑战那些已经被专家接受的理论和观点，并且勇于将自己的想法予以实践而不在乎jeers and even punishment e.g. Einstein’s theory of relativity challenge Newton’s typical physical theories.
2 新手不像专家束缚于现有的理论和经验中，他们具有创新精神 John Nash在他的本科论文中就提到了博弈论的思想
3 然而专家比新手具有更丰富的经验和知识，对其领域更熟悉，基于知识和经验的积累，他们完全有可能在更高的起点上取得a brand new breakthrough现在的Nobel Prize winners 大多是那些长期从事某领域研究的专家。
4 因此，两者之间的cooperation对于某领域研究的发展非常重要，新手creativity, imagination, devotion to the new things, courage; 专家experienced, prudent and proficient ，结合起来可以benefit both of them
5 总结
Is it true that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, as the speaker claims? I fundamentally concede that the novice surpasses the expert to some extent of imagination, creativity and the bravery of challenging the existing theories and ideas, nevertheless, without the proficiency and experience of experts and their guidance, novices cannot achieve great accomplishment. Thus, in my point of view, only the cooperation between them could both benefit their fields of inquiry and make an advancement of their researches.
Apparently, unlike the experts, the neophytes are more willing to suspect and challenge the accepted theories and principles as possible as they can. Although they may feel unfamiliar or even strange with the new realm of study, they do their best to contempt to question about the authorial experts. Even though they may act recklessly and aimlessly, they still rack their brains to think about the new things and eagerly to put their assumptions into appliance. We should acknowledge that, without their courage to doubt the old or maybe out-fashion theories, some field of study cannot be advanced as it likes nowadays. Consider the theory of relativity which was made by the greatest physical scientist Albert Einstein when he was young, it began as a challenge of the typical physics theories of Newton, suffering from innumerable jeers and misunderstanding, however, it was accepted by all scientists around the world in the modern era and its reliability has been proved by the descendants.
Otherwise, as neophytes, people who involve in a traditional area of inquiry may bring about fresh blood and collide with wit sparks concerning they are not limited in the current principles and theories. Comparing with the novices, the experts prefer doing their researches in the scales of acceptance of older and seemingly authorial viewpoints and applying the results of the study to the practice more prudently- in other words, they are more likely to do their studies in a well-designed method even though without the creativity. In contrast, neophytes would not behavior as the same as the experts do and on the contrary, they are more creative and fantastic, they desire the success of the new and novel theories and eagerly put them into practice regardless of the probably punishment of the consequence. Nonetheless, their creativity would be substantiated in the unforeseeable future as a surprise to them and thus become an impetus for them to go on studying. As we known, the famous economist-John Nash, who successfully apply the theories of mathematics into the demonstration of certain economic phenomena, won the Nobel Prize by his first illustration of the non-cooperation game theory in his bachelor thesis. Therefore, without the imagination and creativity, we cannot expect a breakthrough of our current fields of inquiry.
Admittedly, based on the enrichment of numerous of knowledge and experience, the experts are more familiar with the realm of study than the novices. In my observation, none of the great new accomplishment can be achieved with little understanding of the especial field. When we look into the laureates of the Nobel Prize in the recent years, we will find that all of them has advocated in their field of researches within a comparatively long years. Obviously, the brand new breakthrough at time, even necessarily relies on the accumulation of experience and knowledge during several decades. Due to the cautious consideration, the experts would attain their goals no matter in the theories or the practices.
Therefore, the best approach for the advancement in one field of inquiry is the cooperation between the neophytes and the experts. The former excels in their imagination, creativity and the courage of suspecting and challenging the accepted and probably outdate theories and principles, otherwise, the latter seems to be more experienced, effectively proficient and cautious in establishing their theories and applying them into practice. As a consequence, with the guidance of the experts, the novices can functions as effectively as they could, and the professionals can escape from some trivial routines and devote more time to the optimal researches which based on a high start-point. Both of them could benefit from the collaboration and both of them could make a progress of the field of study.
To sum up, as discussed above, I concede the speaker's allegation insofar as the neophytes have the very creativity and courage in the field of inquiry; nevertheless, the speaker overstates the significance of the neophytes' creativity and courage while overlooks the affluent knowledge and experience of experts that conduct them to the correct orientation. Therefore, the cooperation between them could bring about a breakthrough to the unique field of inquiry in the foreseeable future.
没能限时成功，很后悔没有把论证新手优势的二，三两段合起来写，看来issue不是字数越多越好，而是越简练表达越清晰越好，看来得更加努力了，fighting! ^_^ 有拍必回，请留下你的链接，非常感谢
[ 本帖最后由 iq28 于 2007-6-18 17:02 编辑 ] Is it true that the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important discoveries, as the speaker claims? I fundamentally concede that the novice surpasses the expert to some extent of imagination, creativity and the bravery of challenging the existing theories and ideas, nevertheless, without the proficiency and experience of experts and their guidance, novices cannot achieve great accomplishment. Thus, in my point of view, only the cooperation between them could both benefit their fields of inquiry and make an advancement of their researches.
Apparently, unlike the experts, the neophytes are more willing to suspect and challenge the accepted theories and principles as possible as they can. Although they may feel unfamiliar or even strange with the new realm of study, they do their best to contempt to question about the authorial experts. Even though they may act recklessly and aimlessly, they still rack their brains 赞 to think about the new things and eagerly to put their assumptions into appliance. We should acknowledge that, without their courage to doubt the old or maybe out-fashion theories, some field of study cannot be advanced as it likes they like nowadays. Consider the theory of relativity which was made by the greatest physical scientist Albert Einstein when he was young, it began as a challenge of the typicalclassical physics theories of Newton, suffering from innumerable jeers and misunderstanding, however, it was accepted by all scientists around the world in the modern era and its reliability has been proved by the descendants.
Otherwise, as neophytes, people who involve in a traditional area of inquiry may bring about fresh blood and collide with wit sparks concerning they are not limited in the current principles and theories. Comparing compared with the novices, the experts prefer doing their researches in the scales of acceptance of older and seemingly authorial viewpoints and applying the results of the study to the practice more prudently- in other words, they are more likely to do their studies in a well-designed method even though without the creativity. In Bycontrast, neophytes would not behavior as the same as the experts do and on the contrary, they are more creative and fantastic, they desire the success of the new and novel theories and eagerly put them into practice regardless of the probably punishment of the consequence. Nonetheless, their creativity would be substantiated in the unforeseeable future as a surprise to them and thus become an impetus for them to go on studying. As we known, the famous economist-John Nash, who successfully apply the theories of mathematics into the demonstration of certain economic phenomena, won the Nobel Prize by his first illustration of the non-cooperation game theory in his bachelor thesis. Therefore, without the imagination and creativity, we cannot expect a breakthrough of our current fields of inquiry.
Admittedly, based on the enrichment of numerous of knowledge and experience, the experts are more familiar with the realm of study than the novices. In my observation, none of the great new accomplishment can be achieved with little understanding of the especial field. When we look into the laureates of the Nobel Prize in the recent years, we will find that all of them has advocated in their field of researches within a comparatively long years. Obviously, the brand new breakthrough at time, even necessarily relies on the accumulation of experience and knowledge during several decades. Due to the cautious consideration, the experts would attain their goals no matter in the theories or the practices.
Therefore, the best approach for the advancement in one field of inquiry is the cooperation between the neophytes and the experts. The former excels in their imagination, creativity and the courage of suspecting and challenging the accepted and probably outdate theories and principles; otherwise, the latter seems to be more experienced, effectively proficient and cautious in establishing their theories and applying them into practice. As a consequence, with the guidance of the experts, the novices can functions as effectively as they could, and the professionals can escape from some trivial routines and devote more time to the optimal researches which based on a high start-point. Both of them could benefit from the collaboration and both of them could make a progress of the field of study.
To sum up, as discussed above, I concede the speaker's allegation insofar as the neophytes have the very creativity and courage in the field of inquiry; nevertheless, the speaker overstates the significance of the neophytes' creativity and courage while overlooks the affluent knowledge and experience of experts that conduct them to the correct orientation. Therefore, the cooperation between them could bring about a breakthrough to the unique field of inquiry in the foreseeable future.
实在惭愧，不能提出什么建议来，作者写的真是太好了，pfpf！ https://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=400382&extra=page%3D1 jingjing每次是语不惊人死不休，给我好大的压力啊！！！ 占坐！！晚点来读！
页:
[1]