对GRE阅读支持题题型的一点小小体会
[i=s] 本帖最后由 vanstark 于 2009-4-19 18:32 编辑 [/i]"W)P'd8J2I6Tw tC}:J7x4I ob
首先来看这道想必大家已经做烂的题目:
[b]Traditionally, pollination by wind has been viewed as a reproductive process marked by [color=#ff0000]random events[/color] in which the [color=#008000][color=#000000]vagaries[/color] [/color]of the wind are compensated for by the generation of vast quantities of pollen, [color=#ff0000]so that [/color]the ultimate production of new seeds is assured at the expense of producing [color=#ff0000]much more pollen[/color] than is actually used.[/b]WR5V9r4pF
[size=2]27.X!\$jC|]`
Which of the following, if known, is likely to have been the kind of evidence used to [color=#0000ff]support [/color]the view described in the first paragraph?[/size]
[size=2](A) Wind speeds need not be very low for wind-pollinated plants to fail to release pollen.[/size]
[size=2](B) The female reproductive organs of plants often have a sticky surface that allows them to trap airborne pollen systematically.[/size]
[size=2](C) Grasses, as well as conifers, generate specific aerodynamic environments within the immediate vicinity of their reproductive organs.[/size] 0z)z~8w gR1`
[size=2](D) [color=#ff0000]Rain showers[/color] often wash airborne pollen out of the air before it ever reaches an appropriate plant.[font=宋体]([/font]D[font=宋体])[/font][/size]
[size=2](E) The density and size of an airborne题 pollen grain are of equal importance in determining whether that grain will be captured by a plant.[/size]
an8?h8du4|
[size=2]好了,现在来谈谈我对这道题的小小看法:[/size]
[size=2]下图是本人寒假在北京新东方TR905所记录的翟少成老师对此题的讲解(黄皮书146页),参照网络上有关JACK的笔记(P22 61 逻辑题,支持题<—具体事例法,此题正确选项为D 62 randomevents(文)—> 具体的rain showers(题))[img=558,361]http://fmn027.xnimg.cn/fmn027/20090418/0800/b_7731i241023.jpg[/img][/size]
[size=2][/size]
如果没错的话,JACK将rain showers 作为和radom event的一种,然后便选了此题。
一开始,我对此种以[color=#0000ff]寻找原因作为寻找支持题正确选项[/color]的方法乐此不疲。xl*pjf*c
但是做到黄皮书P130第九题(如下),却发生了错误!本人选的是A!#}*rp@!s&het7E5wo
[b]The first supposes that the [color=#0000ff]Sun’s[/color] [color=#0000ff]internal motions[/color] (caused by rotation and convection) interact with its large-scale magnetic field to produce a dynamo, a device in which mechanical energy is converted into the energy of a magnetic field. In short, the Sun’s large-scale magnetic field is taken to be self-sustaining, [color=#ff0000]so that [/color]the solar-activity cycle it drives would be maintained with little overall change for perhaps billions of years.[/b].ZE[aD1X&{
[size=2]
It can be inferred from the passage that the argument in favor of the model described in lines 37-45 would be [color=#0000ff]strengthened[/color] if which of the following were found to be true?[/size]
[size=2](A) Episodes of intense volcanic eruptions in the distant past occurred in cycles having very long periodicities.[/size]
[size=2](B) At the present time the global level of thunderstorm activity increases and decreases in cycles with periodicities of approximately 11 years.[/size];h8L8A.K7L)T:WX
[size=2](C) In the distant past cyclical climatic changes had periodicities of longer than 200 years.[/size] p ?#t/\ h:e
[size=2](D) In the last century the length of the sunspot cycle has been known to vary by as much as 2 years from its average periodicity of 11 years.[font=宋体]([/font]E[font=宋体])[/font][/size]}b+C$uKgJH
[size=2](E) Hundreds of millions of years ago, solar-activity cycles displayed the same periodicities as do present-day solar-activity cycles.[/size]
[size=2][/size],|G(U_(Gh[
我按照JACK的寻找原因的方法,把[size=2][color=#0000ff]volcanic eruptions[/color] 作为[color=#0000ff]Earth's [/color][b][color=#0000ff]internal motions[/color] [/b]的一种恰好和[b][color=#0000ff]Sun’s[/color] [color=#0000ff]internal motions[/color][/b] 对应,明显的这次依然定位于论证部分(前部),当我正高兴之时,答案是E。[color=#0000ff]这里说明一下[/color],JACK所说的不能出现新细节的判断答案的方法不能适用于此类题型,因为支持题本身就不可以出现原文出现过的细节。[/size]#elo9IJy~'`0Ku
[size=2]那么为什么会错呢?解决支持题的方法究竟是什么?[/size]'Am8p!JxOCW
[size=2]结果我分别在王昆嵩和王鹏的老版网络课堂中,找到了第一题的相关解释:[/size]
[size=2][img=510,344]http://fmn028.xnimg.cn/fmn028/20090418/0845/b_8246c241023.jpg[/img][/size]
[size=2][/size]
[size=2][img=511,365]http://fmn028.xnimg.cn/fmn028/20090418/0850/b_8454f241023.jpg[/img][/size]n#pz4nS&U"j
[size=2]王昆嵩蜻蜓点水,只说明是具体事例法。[/size]$^Hu1l0n/A3r2G
[size=2]王鹏说的比较具体“事例可以support现象、结论、差异中的任何一项”(明显比JACK的方法更全面)。可是,在考场上不可能一一寻找对应于现象、结论、差异的答案![/size]
[size=2]参考[url=http://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=187562&extra=page%3D1%26amp%3Bfilter%3Dtype%26amp%3Btypeid%3D113]http://bbs.gter.net/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=187562&extra=page%3D1%26amp%3Bfilter%3Dtype%26amp%3Btypeid%3D113[/url][/size][url=http://share.xiaonei.com/share/ShareList.do?id=239733316#share_618856206][size=2][color=#005eac][/color][/size][/url]4bG RqWG%e-B
[size=2]有关逆向寻找解题思路的方法后发现:[color=#0000ff]两道题的答案都对应于句子的后半部,即结论部分[/color]。出乎意料的是两道题都和谐般的出现的so that!!!!ETS明显是想考察对结论句的理解,这和JACK对出题点判断的论述不谋而合![/size]
[size=2]这样: [/size]1.(D) [color=#ff0000]Rain showers[/color] often wash airborne pollen out of the air before it ever reaches an appropriate plant. [[b][color=#ff0000]so that [/color]the ultimate production of new seeds is assured at the expense of producing [color=#ff0000]much more pollen[/color] than is actually used] 中[/b] wash out…before it reach …在含义上对应[b]producing [color=#ff0000]much more pollen[/color] [/b]
2.(E) Hundreds of millions of years ago, solar-activity cycles displayed the same periodicities as do present-day solar-activity cycles.[[b][color=#ff0000]so that [/color]the solar-activity cycle it drives would be maintained with little overall change for perhaps billions of years][/b]
Hundreds of millions of years 对应于 [b]billions of years;[/b] displayed the same 对应于[b]maintained with little overall change [/b](d:D`KU ^ Y+AM
[b]根据区区两道小题的对比,笔者作出对支持题解法的初步判断:[color=#0000ff]定位于结论句,寻找对应于结论的事例作为选项答案。^-^这是TS! 嘿嘿[/color][/b]
z NZ"Mn~g2a8X@
[b]其实道理不难理解,拿勾股定理来说,有N种证明方法,而最终要证明的东西直指[/b]a2+b2=c2 !!! [font=宋体]如果[/font]GRE[font=宋体]阅读中出现了有关勾股定理的证明的文章,并且出现了支持题,给出五个选项,问道下列选项中那个可以[/font]support/strengthen[font=宋体]勾股定理?你说我是选择有关勾股定理的证明条件、证明过程、还是证明了勾股定理结论的选项?[/font] [font=宋体]很显然选择符合a2+b2=c2 结论的[color=#000000]选项![/color][/font] j6l#]"a&|
mO J/@ JQf$d+~
Ti?E b
[font=宋体][color=#000000]写到这里,差不多可以结束了,当然写得很肤浅的说,证据也非常有限。我会进一步思考阅读题的的解题思路特别是支持题的解题方法,非常感谢老翟醍醐灌顶的指导!感谢雅姐、狒狒、小孔等G友的支持与鼓励![/color][/font]
[font=宋体][color=#000000] vanstark 09.4.18[/color][/font] 谢谢分享 ^^ 大家可以给个评价吗?谢谢 引用:这里说明一下,JACK所说的不能出现新细节的判断答案的方法不能适用于此类题型,因为支持题本身就不可以出现原文出现过的细节。
我觉得:这种题是一种具体化的细节,正确答案很容易出现文中没有细节。 czT7p5U!i
对于没有出现新词的选项我们也要留意,看会不会有什么决定性的约束条件被漏了。
{C-wxu
引用:笔者作出对支持题解法的初步判断:定位于结论句,寻找[b]对应于结论[/b]的事例作为选项答案。^-^这是TS! 嘿嘿 。!~'h$I,SCj^wW
其实道理不难理解,拿勾股定理来说,有N种证明方法,而最终要证明的东西直指a2+b2=c2 !!! 如果GRE阅读中出现了有关勾股定理的证明的文章,并且出现了支持题,给出五个选项,问道下列选项中那个可以support/strengthen勾股定理?你说我是选择有关勾股定理的证明条件、证明过程、还是证明了勾股定理结论的选项? 很显然选择符合a2+b2=c2 结论的选项!N Yl Y;o^;mn
我觉得:因为是要证明观点结论,必然是。。
引用:王鹏说的比较具体“事例可以support现象、结论、差异中的任何一项”(明显比JACK的方法更全面)。可是,在考场上不可能一一寻找对应于现象、结论、差异的答案!
同意王鹏老师的角度,就是答案角度不唯一,他的说法与你的是不冲突的,要证明结论,可以从三个方面具体化。不过我不太明白他为什么总结成那几个方面,从这两道题来看,事例可以support原因,论据,结论中的任何一项据我总结。
关键是理解因果关系吧。理解了,不管从哪方面来支持,其它选项都容易排除的。。。MS我经常用排除法。。。是挺费时间的。。 嗯 很好,很精辟
页:
[1]