Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
-----------------------------------------------
这个题目看似简单,但是不好怎么写,即便写了,大概也是很大众化的没有什么新鲜感的观点》不知道大家怎么看
大家说说思路看看。。。
我写了一点,但是我自己都看不下去,结尾也没有写.........
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hot issues on eaqual numbers of male and female enrollment of Universities emerged in recent years. Since equality is being applied on every subject, why not take the gender distribution into consideration? While, I could hardly side with the opinion.

As a male or female, people own distinct characteristics. The male prefers to scientific and technological subjects such as engineering, computer science, mathematics and calculating; while females are prior to the literature and art like foreign language, human resource, humanity, law and music. They each could make full use of their features to exert their abilities, which also can be seen as the application to Darwin's human evolution theory. If equal numbers are enrolled and distributed to every subject, cut-throat competition would become worse after their agraduation. Nurses are no longer prefer to females to some extent, safeguards also welcome young ladies. Thus, great changes towards peoples' job attitude may occur upside down.

Besides, the equal number of enrollment would  confine(restrict) the students' develpment, which cuts off their advantages to adapt to the universities. It's not a democratic stratage but a monoply on students gender, which forms an evil cycle on their development.

To sum up..................
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
自己先汗一个
欢迎大家来集思广益拉........

我查找了一下，用的关键词是“gender equity”，“university enrollment”
发现几篇文章，若你有时间，可细细读之。

from:
1、 http://www.becker-posner-blog.co ... is_the_growing.html
2、http://www.diversityweb.org/digest/Sp01/research2.html

尤其是第2个地址的某些段落，以及它的结尾。希望能给你帮助

其实你的思路可以，就按照这样写下去，最后能提一下适当的在专业之间做一个平衡，因为你的整篇文章从语气上来说都是在正面论述，结尾能稍作让步为上。

这里给一下我的思路，仅供参考：
1.首先，提出这一问题的原因就是，现在大学里边专业之间男女比例失衡很厉害（尤其在我现在的这种理科学校尤为严重）
2.但是，提出这一说法的人，似乎有拿男女平等做文章的意思，然后进一步得出每个专业都需要保持性别平衡。很显然，这就是你反驳他的论点的关键所在。
3.男女无论是生理，心理上都有差别，忽视这种差别是不合理的，而专业之间同样存在很大的差别（譬如工科，就比较适合男生，而艺术科，适合女生），必须看到这些差异。
4.最后，提出一点解决方案（譬如学校可以鼓励文理之间的互修课程），然后重申论点就可以了。