寄托天下 寄托天下
查看: 3066|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[问答] 求助,9304sc文章题目,请大家帮忙看看,十分感谢 [复制链接]

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
142
寄托币
3130
注册时间
2014-12-9
精华
0
帖子
723

CS offerl勋章 加拿大offer勋章

跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-6-11 19:17:56 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
9304sc

In February 1848 the people of Paris rose in revolt against the constitutional monarchy of Louis-Philippe. Despite the existence of excellent narrative accounts, the February Days, as this revolt is called, have been largely ignored by social historians of the past two decades. For each of the three other major insurrections in nineteenth- century Paris-July 1830, June 1843, and May 1871 there exists at least a sketch of participants' backgrounds and an analysis, more or less rigorous, of the reasons for the occurrence of the uprisings. Only in the case of the February Revolution do we lack a useful description of participants that might characterize it in the light of what social history has taught us about the process of revolu-tionary mobilization.

Two reasons for this relative neglect seem obvious. First, the insurrection of February has been overshadowed by that of June. The February Revolution overthrew a regime, to be sure, but met with so little resistance that it failed to generate any real sense of historical drama. Its successor, on the other hand, appeared to pit key socioeconomic groups in a life-or-death struggle and was widely seen by contemporary observers as marking a historical departure. Through their interpretations, which exert a con-tinuing influence on our understanding of the revolutionary process, the impact of the events of June has been magnified, while, as an unintended consequence, the significance of the February insur-rection has been diminished. Second, like other "successful" insurrections, the events of February failed to generate the most desirable kinds of historical records. Although the June insurrection of 1848 and the Paris Commune of 1871 would be con-sidered watersheds of nineteenth- century French history by any standard, they also present the social historian with a signal advantage: these failed insurrections created a mass of invaluable documentation as a by- produce of authorities efforts to search out and punish the rebels.

Quite different is the outcome of successful insurrections like those of July 1830 and February 1848. Experi- ences are retold, but participants typically resume their daily routines without ever recording their activities. Those who played salient roles may become the objects of highly embellished verbal accounts or in rare cases, of celebratory articles in contemporary periodicals. And it is true that the   publicly acknowledged leaders of an uprising frequently write memoirs. However, such documents are likely to be highly unreliable, unrepresent-ative, and unsystematically preserved, especially when compared to the detailed judicial dossiers prepared for everyone arrested following a failed insurrection. As a consequence, it may prove difficult or impossible to establish for a successful revolution a comprehensive and trustworthy picture of those who participated ,or to answer even the most basic questions one might pose concerning the social origins of the insurgents.

2.It can be inferred from the passage that support for the objectives of the February Revolution was

A negligible
B misguided
C fanatical
D spontaneous
E widespread

答案应该选B 还是 E呢?

我选了B ,但有的版本答案是E,如果选E,我就不知道对应到哪里了,请大家帮忙看看。

非常感谢
回应
0

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
55
寄托币
283
注册时间
2015-6-12
精华
0
帖子
94
沙发
发表于 2015-6-12 03:39:31 |只看该作者
(偶是新人,求多打分哈)

这段文字用的是总分的叙述方法。第一段提出问题:2月的这次革命事件不被历史学家重视。原因为何呢?

第二段指出,第一条原因二月的被六月的影响所覆盖了. 第二条原因是2月革命留下的史料不多。

第三段进一步指出二月这次革命的史料不多,因为参与者打完仗就回家过平常的生活了。尽管有些领导人物会有些转机,但这些材料仍然缺乏代表性。作者总结道,这次历史事件以及相关史料的缺乏是2月革命在历史学中记叙甚少的原因。也因此,可能无法对于这次革命做任何有价值的推断。

翻译成大白话就是,作者认为这次革命啥痕迹都没有,啥信息都没有,所以不能对它做任何界定。

这道题目问的是 这次二月革命的目标有证据可查吗?
a. 基本没有
b. 误导性
c-e 大量很多到处都是。

c-e直接排除。
a 排除因为存在好多呢,看最后一段,比如领导人的传记。
b. 误导性,跟最后一段作者用的那些词 unreliable unrepresentative 之类一致。就是说那些资料一大把,但都没啥可信度。

这题挺难的,偶第一直觉是选a. 想了半天,还是b准确。
仅供参考。有空赏分哈:)

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
142
寄托币
3130
注册时间
2014-12-9
精华
0
帖子
723

CS offerl勋章 加拿大offer勋章

板凳
发表于 2015-6-12 10:07:48 |只看该作者
brookside 发表于 2015-6-12 03:39
(偶是新人,求多打分哈)

这段文字用的是总分的叙述方法。第一段提出问题:2月的这次革命事件不被历史学 ...

我也选了B的,但是答案是E ,我就不知道为什么了?

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
55
寄托币
283
注册时间
2015-6-12
精华
0
帖子
94
地板
发表于 2015-6-12 11:09:17 |只看该作者
wfxmfwjw 发表于 2015-6-12 10:07
我也选了B的,但是答案是E ,我就不知道为什么了?


如果根绝答案想的话,就是从上下文推断,这个材料有很多,但是准确度打折。那这样看b估计就是说准确度打折,e就是说很多。所以e也可以。
不过这道题如果不知道答案我肯定做不出。GRE阅读中有很多这样的,我觉得吧,90%搞清楚就行了,剩下的10%交给运气吧。哈。

突然发现在这儿答题不能加分,后悔ing. 花了我至少10分钟啊,汗。学渣闪了。:)
已有 1 人评分声望 收起 理由
wfxmfwjw + 1 赞一个

总评分: 声望 + 1   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

Rank: 6Rank: 6

声望
142
寄托币
3130
注册时间
2014-12-9
精华
0
帖子
723

CS offerl勋章 加拿大offer勋章

5
发表于 2015-6-12 11:27:05 |只看该作者
brookside 发表于 2015-6-12 11:09
如果根绝答案想的话,就是从上下文推断,这个材料有很多,但是准确度打折。那这样看b估计就是说准确度打 ...

非常感谢,你说的加分是指这个吗?我还没使用过评分呢

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
55
寄托币
283
注册时间
2015-6-12
精华
0
帖子
94
6
发表于 2015-6-12 11:28:00 |只看该作者
啊?
原来可以给分,好吧,下次我再来转悠,嘿嘿。
谢啦!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
55
寄托币
283
注册时间
2015-6-12
精华
0
帖子
94
7
发表于 2015-6-12 11:31:09 |只看该作者
wfxmfwjw 发表于 2015-6-12 11:27
非常感谢,你说的加分是指这个吗?我还没使用过评分呢

估计是的,我收到系统提醒了。
我也是刚注册。偶有敛财的倾向,总怕分数不够用,所以注册第一件事就是看哪里能挣点分数。然后看见你的求助帖,就试试咯。握手,谢啦!

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
176
寄托币
2322
注册时间
2015-2-24
精华
0
帖子
308
8
发表于 2015-6-12 22:04:05 |只看该作者
祝你好运啦~

使用道具 举报

Rank: 2

声望
50
寄托币
57
注册时间
2016-9-13
精华
0
帖子
13
9
发表于 2017-10-21 12:32:35 |只看该作者
Its successor, on the other hand, appeared to pit key socioeconomic groups in a life-or-death struggle and was widely seen by contemporary observers as marking a historical departure.

使用道具 举报

RE: 求助,9304sc文章题目,请大家帮忙看看,十分感谢 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
求助,9304sc文章题目,请大家帮忙看看,十分感谢
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1840715-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
关闭

站长推荐

寄托24周年庆,发祝福送寄托币!
寄托24岁生日,邀请寄托的小伙伴在本命年周年庆发出你对寄托的祝福, 可以是简单的一句“生日快乐”, 送出祝福小伙伴将会有寄托币奖励!

查看 »

报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部