- 最后登录
- 2013-4-11
- 在线时间
- 503 小时
- 寄托币
- 1306
- 声望
- 139
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-6
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 22
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 1261
- UID
- 2707493
- 声望
- 139
- 寄托币
- 1306
- 注册时间
- 2009-10-6
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 22
|
本帖最后由 名字是个词儿 于 2009-12-7 11:26 编辑
TPO 13 L3,变态的七分钟演讲
才发现一个严重的问题,为啥写在记事本里的文字,全文粘贴过来,就少了好多空格捏???不少单词都连到一起去了。
Listen to part of a lecture in a poetry class. The professer is discussing medieval poetry.
OK, so the two poems we are looking at today fall into the catigary of medieval time, which was how long ago?
Almost a thousand years ago, right?
Yes, that's right.
But professor are you sure these are poems? I mean I thought poems were shorter, these are more like long stories. I mean, one of them is all about love, but the other one that Chan-chang-cha...whatever it's called, the other one, well it was all about fighting and battles, I mean, can both of them be consider poems?
Well, think back to the very beginning of this course. Remember how we define poetry? In the very broadest sense, we said it's written to evoke to make you, the audiance, have some kind of the emotional experience through the use of imagary. Umm, some kind of pridictable rythem, and usually, but not always, there is more than one meaning impplied with the word that is used. Let's start with the Chanson poetry first. That's Chanson. Chanson poems became popular in Europe, paticulally in France, and the term is actually short for a longer Franch phrase that translate to songs of deeds. Now they were called songs of deeds, because strangly enough, they were written to discribe the heroic deeds or actions of warriers, the knights during conflicts. We don't know a lot about the authors, it's still contested somewhat, but we're pretty sure about who the Chanson poems were written for. That is, they were written for the knights and the lords, the nobility that they served. The poems were song performed by a minstrila, a singer who travel from castle to castle, singing to the local lords and his knights. Well, would someone summarize the main features of the chanson poem you read?
Well, there is a hero, a knight, who goes to battle, and he's admired for his currage, bravary and loyalty, loyalty to the lord he serves, his country and his fellow warriers in the field, he is a skilled fighter, willing to face the most extreme dangers, sacraficial, will to sacrafise anything and everything to protect his king and country.
OK, now given that the intended audiance for these poems were knights and lords, what can we say about the purpose of chanson poetry? What kinds of feelings was it meant to provoke?
I guess they must have been really appealing to those knights and lords who were listening to them, hearing the songs probably made them feel more patrayotic, made they feel like it was a good and nobel thing to serve their country in whatever way they could.
Good, we've got a pretty good picture of what the chanson hero was like. Now let's compare that to the hero in the other poem. The other poem is an example of what's called romance poetry, and the hero in the romance poem was also a knight, but what made the knight in the romance poetry different from the knight in chanson poetry? Well, first, the purpose of the hero's actions was different. The hero in romance poetry is independant, purely solitary in a way, not like the chanson poeit, who was alway surround by his fighting componiants, he doesn't engage in conflict to protect his lord or country, he does it for the sake of adventure, to improve himself, to show his worthy of respect and love for his lady. He is very concious of the patitular rules of social behaviors he has to live up to, somehow, and all of his actions are for the purpose of proving that he is an upright moral well-mannered well-behaved individual. You may have noticed that in chanson poetry, there isn't much about the hero's feelings, the focus is on the actions, the deeds, but the romance poetry discribes a lot of the inner feelings, the motivations, psychology, you could say, of a knight trying to improve himself, to better himself, so that he is worthy of the love of a woman.
What explains this difference? Well, digging into the historical context tells us a lot. Romance poetry emurged a few generations after chanson, and its roots were in geographic regions of France that were calmer, where conflict wasn't central to people's lives. More peaceful time meant there was more time for education, travel, more time for reflection, another name for romance poetry that's often synonimoused with it is troubadour poetry.
Troubadours were the authors of these new romance poems, and we know a lot more about the troubadours than we do about the chanson authors, because they often had small biographical sketches added to thire poems, that gave pretty specific information about thire social status, geographical location, and a small outline of their career. This information wasn't particulaly reliable, because they were sometimes based on fictitious stories of great adventure or scrabed together from parts of different poems, but there is enough there to squeeze or infer some facts about their social class. The political climate has settled down enough so that troubadours had the luxary of beking able to spend most, if not all of their time, creating, crafting, or composing their love songs for thire audiances. And yes, these poems were also sung, many troubadours were able to make a living being full time poeists, which should tell you something about the value of that profession during medieval time. |
|