寄托天下 寄托天下
查看: 3322|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[资料分享] Argument 71 提纲 [复制链接]

Rank: 4

声望
102
寄托币
678
注册时间
2015-11-30
精华
0
帖子
177
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-8-5 23:29:19 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Argument 71
Arg 71build new road or encourage ride sharing

The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times.

"Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed. Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods. It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville. Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas. Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented, and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably. There is no reason why a policy like Garville's shouldn't work equally well in Waymarsh."

Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.


C1: Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem.

G1Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just completed.

C2: Members of the town council already have suggested more road building to address the problem, but as well as being expensive, the new construction will surely disrupt some of our residential neighborhoods.

C3: It would be better to follow the example of the nearby city of Garville.

G2: Last year Garville implemented a policy that rewards people who share rides to work, giving them coupons for free gas.

G3: Pollution levels in Garville have dropped since the policy was implemented,

G4: and people from Garville tell me that commuting times have fallen considerably.

C4: There is no reason why a policy like Garville's shouldn't work equally well in Waymarsh.


A1(G1, C1): The traffic is a problem given the longer commuting time reflected in the survey.

A2(G2, G3, G4): The policy is the reason why pollution levels dropped and the commuting times fell.

A3(C3, C4): The policy transfer will lead to similar success.

A4(C2,C3): The proposed policy is more cost-effective than the alternative policy.




Argument范文与提纲目录(tesolchina)
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-2030117-1-1.html
回应
0

使用道具 举报

RE: Argument 71 提纲 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
Argument 71 提纲
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-2030313-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
关闭

站长推荐

寄托24周年庆,发祝福送寄托币!
寄托24岁生日,邀请寄托的小伙伴在本命年周年庆发出你对寄托的祝福, 可以是简单的一句“生日快乐”, 送出祝福小伙伴将会有寄托币奖励!

查看 »

报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部