- 最后登录
- 2019-5-15
- 在线时间
- 114 小时
- 寄托币
- 342
- 声望
- 54
- 注册时间
- 2017-6-19
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 64
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 249
- UID
- 3817701
 
- 声望
- 54
- 寄托币
- 342
- 注册时间
- 2017-6-19
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 64
|
发表于 2017-8-15 10:47:27
|显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 tesolchina 于 2017-8-18 21:09 编辑
1 列明问题的类型
内容构思
2 提出问题
第2题 To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
对于题目中的the most important characteristic,最重要的特征感觉本身就不好定义啊?要怎么考虑呢(如果题目是to understand important characteristics 那就好办了,可以把characteristic随意拆分成几个)
3 附上相关的题目和习作片段
只回答具体问题,不整体评价习作内容
The statement that to learn a society's most important characteristics, one must study its major cities is unconvincing, or too absolute to some degree. For different people, the most important characteristics of one society may vary from technology, culture of diet to architecture forms and so on. Admittedly, some of them just like technology can be reflected well in the major cities of a society. However, other characteristics, such as a society's diet culture and traditional architecture forms, may not present themselves well in large cities than less developed areas like rural areas or small cities in that country.
4 结合我的视频讲解和范文简述你自己对这个问题的思考和想法
像标红这样写可以吗?我自己的理解是题目问的是“最”重要的特征,由于接下来要分情况讨论,故体现不出题目要求,所以打算说不同的人对一个社会“最”重要的特征理解不同,从而过渡到对接下来3方面的讨论
想请教下老师这样的考虑是否必要?如果没有考虑the most ,直接分3个characteristic 讨论会不会算小跑题?(毕竟讨论的范围和题目要求不是很吻合)
For different people, the most important characteristics of one society may vary from technology, culture of diet to architecture forms and so on.
这句话提出对于不同的人来说社会的最重要特征是不一样的,这个说法偏离了题目的初衷。题目关注的是如何有效的研究社会的最重要特征,如果这个特征因人而异就很难客观的研究了。因此不建议在这里提出因人而异的观点,而应该着重具体的讨论几个characteristics。至于the most important这个点,只要在文章开头指出你讨论的特点是the most important就可以了。题目的重点在于是否应该研究城市。
|
-
总评分: 声望 + 1
查看全部评分
|