Scientific American 60 Second Science听抄（有音频文件）

woodmanUID：161906

听力很菜,每天都在坚持做Scientific American 60 Second Science听抄,不过不能完全听懂,把每天的听抄贴出来,希望高人指教,不胜感激!
Episode 161: April 24, 2007
This is Scientific Americans sixty secondsscience. I’m Steve Mirsky. Got a minute?
Broadway has a newproduction of heir the wind(没听出来) based on 1925 scope’smonkey trial. And the American museum of natural history has a new whole ofhuman argens(不知道是哪个词). A short article(没听到) on Monday’s New York Times editorial page about the play and exhibit finished by reminding us that chimp DNA is almost 99% identical to human DNA. The advancer says, perhaps jokingly, that creationists can take heart in different 1% as a 1% chance that evolution did not happen. Well, joke that people may take this seriously. After all, it is on the editorial page of New York Times. So let’s trace this out, in fact the approximate 1% difference in the DNA sequences of human’s and chimp’s is leaving documentation of the random genetic mutation that has been selected in the 60 million years, since we and chimps broke away from the common ancestor. That 1% difference in DNA does represent small chance that evolution did not happen. It is the regulation of evolution that did happen. We all are monkey’s uncle.

podcast 下载地址：
http://www.sciam.com/podcast/


精品回复：
635,698楼，724,zhenzhen_163
每天的音频会更新在第一个发布文本的人的楼层上，请自己注意查找。
基本上每天的文本我都会随便找一位网友的进行修正，之后会把这个我最后认定的结果拿给母语人士，请求帮忙更正。请大家注意找不二周助的头像，:loveliness: 参照最可靠的答案修改自己的听抄呵~也请原谅我的擅自修改（具体形式可以参见第257楼）
-- 小楣

[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2008-3-17 11:52 编辑 ]

wgaggassi34UID：2279352

建议直接去网上看答案~
沪江英语上有专门的VOA训练!:)

thecloserUID：2320732

楼主是去普特听的吗..

ccrobin000UID：2296575

是边听边写,还是听十几秒停一下,写好了再继续听?

woodmanUID：161906

回2#，没找见文字答案，呵呵，眼睛都看花了。
回3#，我直接在网站上听的，不是去普特。
回4#，不中断地边听边写

gnuliutingtingUID：2123029

不错，告诉我地址，我们一起听

moondy74178945UID：2231844

不是很容易听，希望楼主坚持，加油！

woodmanUID：161906

Episode 160: April 23, 2007
This is Scientific Americans sixty secondsscience. I’m Steve Mirsky. Got a minute?
For a satisfying career and happy life, trydoing something that helps other people. That’s the findings of something called the general social survey performed by University of Chicago's National Opinion Research Centre. The survey asked people how satisfied theywere with their jobs, and how happy they were in general and accordingly listed the results. On average, 47% of people were very satisfied with their jobs. 33%said they were very happy. On the job front, clergy topped the lists. 87% of clergy surveyed said they were very satisfied with the calling. And 67% said they were happy. 80% of firefighters really like their work. And 57% said they were very happy. The kind get no satisfaction list was topped by roofers. Only a quarterof them said the job was satisfying. Only 14% of roofers said they were happy.The list may be less happy than they are. Waiters, bartenders, cashiers, various kinds of retail, sales people also did not like their work too much. For more information, just google general social survey.

[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2007-4-26 19:38 编辑 ]

woodmanUID：161906

谢谢鼓励，坚持有一个月了，希望能够坚持到最后，呵呵。

xixihehe0167UID：2253387

我曾经听过这个program，不过没有试过听抄，觉得很难:)
楼主值得我学习，希望稍后能和你一起努力

加油:)

lintelleUID：2297267

Broadway has a new production of heir the wind(没听出来) based on the 1925 scope’s monkey trial. And the American museum of natural history has a new whole of human argens(不知道是哪个词). A short item on Monday’s New York Times editorial page about the play and exhibit finished by reminding us that chimp DNA is almost 99% identical to human DNA. The item then says, perhaps jokingly, that creationists can take hearteningly different 1% as a 1% chance that evolution did not happen. Well, joke or not people may take this seriously. After all, it is on the editorial page of the New York Times. So let’s straighten this out, in fact the approximately 1% difference in the DNA sequences of human’s and chimp’s is living documentation of the random genetic mutations that has been selected in the 60 million years or so, since we and chimps broke away from the common ancestor. That 1% difference in DNA does represent small chance that evolution did not happen. It is the record of evolution that did happen. We are all the monkeys’ uncle.

听成这样很不错了。继续加油。

[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2007-4-25 18:51 编辑 ]

xixihehe0167UID：2253387

刚刚听抄了一段，是April 24的，楼主看看:) 不过Broadway production 的名字我也听不出来:confused:




Broadway has a new production of In Heir of the Wind based on 1925 Scope's monkey trial.And the American Museum of natural history has a new hallof human origins. A short item(短文：报纸或杂志的一小段) on Monday's New York Times editorial page about the play and exhibit finished by reminding us chimp DNA is almost99% identical to human DNA. The item then says,perhaps jokingly, that creationist can take heart inthe differing 1% as a 1% chance that evolution did not happen.

While joke or not, people might take it seriously.After all, it's on the editorial page of New York Times. So let's straightenthis out. In fact, the proximately 1% difference in the DNA sequences of humansand chimps is living documentation of the random genetic mutations that havebeen selected in the 60 million years or so since we and chimps split away fromour common ancestor, that 1% DNA difference doesn't represent small chance thatevolution did not happen, it's the record of evolution that did happen. we areall the monkeys' uncle.

张若愚UID：2298998

楼主真的很强！加油！

woodmanUID：161906

They call it seriously vomit fruit.Tahitian Noni is a Polynesian shrub that smells so bad will bla. Anyway, most species of fruit fly stay their way on the plant, which gets it least smell from the presence of hexone and octanol gases. The fly’s aversion is well founded,even a night on the fated fruit, they die. But one species of fruit fly,Drosophia sechellia loves the puky plant, it even leave eggs there. The studywas just published in the Public Library of Science Biology. Researchers looked the genetic difference between the sechellia and close relatives (shandalali,没听出来，写的谐音). They found very different pattern of expression of two genes were responsible for all faction that may be sechellia fruit flies no longer notice the bad smell. More researches rely on rival of the rest of the story. But seems a good bet that once sechallia stop minding the funk, they quickly develop resistance tothe (asidic,没听出来，写的谐音) environment kills other species (jusofalar,没听出来，写的谐音). And mutations that many new flies tolerate the smelly plant may have been the first steps to a new species.

[ 本帖最后由 lintelle 于 2007-4-26 19:40 编辑 ]

xixihehe0167UID：2253387

在楼主的基础上修改了一下:)


Apr 25



They call it seriously vomit fruit.Tahitian Noni is a Polynesian shrubthat smells so bad will bla. Anyway, most species of fruit fly (flies)staytheir wayon (stay away from)the plant, which gets it least(its nasty) smell from the presence ofhexone(听得是 hexanoic,，但不确定) and octanol(听得是 octanoic,，不确定) gases. The fly’s aversion is well founded,even anight on the fated fruit(if they even alight on the fat of the fruit), they die. But one species of fruitfly,Drosophia sechellia loves the puky plant, it even leave(leaves 连读) eggs there.The study was(In the study) just published in the Public Library of Science Biology.(,) Researchers looked the genetic difference(differences) between the sechellia andclose relatives (shandalali,没听出来，写的谐音).They found (a )very different pattern of expression of two genes were(delete were)responsible for all faction (olfaction) that may be sechellia fruit flies no longernotice the bad smell. More researches rely on(自己听出来的是will along，但是没有把握) rival of the rest of thestory. But seems a good bet that once sechallia stop minding the funk,they quickly develop(developed) resistance to the (asidic,没听出来，写的谐音) environment (that )kills other species (jusofalar,没听出来，写的谐音). And mutations that many new flies (made a few species)tolerate the(delete the) smelly plant may have been the first steps to a new species.