把北美范文都快看全了~可是先在很怕雷同了，怎么办？？？

ttstartUID：2593649

从复习issue到现在，一直在看北美范文，把他的思路都看的很明白了，但语言还是自己的，到不了那个境界
可是又怕ETS太严，观点会重复，背叛雷同。
我是4月一号愚人节的考试，现在应该做什么，避免雷同呢？？？
大家帮帮忙啊！！！

发个我刚写的，不用太细的看，只看下这个相似程度会不会雷同,谢谢啦！



题目：ISSUE38 - "In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn as much by watching television as they can by reading books."
字数：505          用时：00:45:00          日期：2009-3-22 21:32:34

The speaker's assertion can be understood in tow aspects: firstly, the book is not so import; secondly, reading books can be replaced by watching TV when it comes to achieve knowledge. I concede that following the spread of television, some functions of books such as amuing(amusement) can be instead by television. However, for the different characters of book and TV I strongly disagree with the speaker's second assertion.

I agree with the first assertion that books are not so important and effective as books when it comes to the functions of amusement and information for the inherent different characters of them. Many people would like to watch football games as a relaxer, and sure that most of them prefer the online television which full of the exciting movement of the players rather than the printed books or magazine as a recall of the excellent competition. And then, imaging that when we want to get information about the Iraq War, the TV can provide us a vivid video and when we want to record human kind first step on moon, the movement memorization on TV is surely better than the article on papers. Thus, in some aspects, books are replaced gradual by the TV.

However, There are three compelling reasons for me to insist that reading books can not and should not replaced by watching TV as a institution of learning. The first one is the books can carry systemic and deeper level knowledge that can be not involved by television. Books involves the total knowledge(不可数) and wisdom in the human history which are arranged in a logical and systemic way. In contrast of the TV, to attract people's eyeball, the TV programs are always select the attractive and exciting part. Moreover some abstract knowledge such as theory of physics and philosophy, the same abstract article is a better way to illustrate them than the flowing quickly video.

The second reason is that, the purpose of the media today are in pursuit of the most profit and as a result the great amount advertizes, amusement program and even popular stars scandal, which have no sense neither from content nor form. Instead of wasting time for the limited valuable information and wasting energy to select the useful ones, reading books is a more reasonable way to get the information and knowledge for us .

The last reason is that book is quite convenient for us to carry and read so that we can think over and compare the knowledge that we can not absorb immediately. As we know, learning is a trial-and-error process and reading books is a fit way to accord with this process. While, the flash picture on TV is far less than books in this aspect.

In sum, because the inherent difference between book and TV, it might a better choice to watch TV when we want to relax or get current news. However, when it comes to learning, I disagree with the speaker that people can learn as much by watching TV as reading books

coco3263UID：16360

到了现场一着急，根本不可能和原文完全一致的。至今仍然记得自己在电脑上急中生智，完全现场发挥的情景，自己看到了一些小错误都没有改了，而且有强烈的chinglish成分，但事后居然得了四分，感觉这个考试看中的是你的思维逻辑的脉络，而次之才是语言。语言是t的事情。

ZeratelUID：2262286

观点重复不会雷同的