寄托天下 寄托天下
查看: 2282|回复: 2

[香港&新加坡] 百分百录取率?CHK LLM 和JD录取情况质疑 [复制链接]

Rank: 1

声望
0
寄托币
15
注册时间
2009-6-6
精华
0
帖子
0
发表于 2009-6-6 16:47:13 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 masterofllm 于 2009-6-6 17:04 编辑

有申请CUHK LLM或JD,被拒掉的嘛?统计一下数据
回应

使用道具 举报

Rank: 5Rank: 5

声望
28
寄托币
3292
注册时间
2008-2-12
精华
0
帖子
14
发表于 2009-6-6 17:10:59 |显示全部楼层
英美许多非顶尖法学院的LLM录取率也是100%。中国的大学有选拔性质,国外非顶尖大学没有选拔性质,只是提供教育。

使用道具 举报

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
25
寄托币
479
注册时间
2008-11-12
精华
0
帖子
5
发表于 2009-6-6 17:34:14 |显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 TANKH 于 2009-6-6 18:00 编辑
英美许多非顶尖法学院的LLM录取率也是100%。中国的大学有选拔性质,国外非顶尖大学没有选拔性质,只是提供教育。
cometous 发表于 2009-6-6 17:10


If you are insinuating that the above assumption applies to CUHK admission policy.I don't agree with what you've said. Just because the quality of the applicants this year might be better than the previous years doesn't mean that they are not being selective. If you are telling me that an applicant with low GPA , say, 3.01 or a 3rd class Honours and 5.0 in  IELTS, got into the course, then I would probably say they are not being selective, given that this applicant doesn't even meet the basic requirement.

My point is, there are millions of  other possibilities that could explain this, and it's unwise to jump into conclusion that  CUHK 没有选拔性质based on an anecdotal evidence - CUHK's 录取率 which seems like almost 100%. From a statistical point of view, your population is not even complete (i.e. a list of CUHK LLM and JD applicants), so if you are actually drawing a sample size from a skewed and biased population (i.e. list of applicants purely from forums), your inference would most likely be biased and contains error, therefore unfit to make such conclusion.

No comment on 中国的大学有选拔性质.
已有 1 人评分寄托币 收起 理由
阿泰 + 20 谢谢分享

总评分: 寄托币 + 20   查看全部投币

使用道具 举报

RE: 百分百录取率?CHK LLM 和JD录取情况质疑 [修改]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
最新
精华
转发
转发该帖子
百分百录取率?CHK LLM 和JD录取情况质疑
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-961852-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部