0910AW个人习作 issue103 byGa-row组预言

预言UID：2625991

History is a lesson that people studies knowledge with the events and person in the past time, anglicising the cause and result of the historic events and finding out the regulation between every node of the history. If people who can take advantages of the historic experiment, history study would be the best guilder in his life. The author maintain that the study of history is worthy only when the study directly relate to our daily life. First i can not regard this topic as a totally wrong one, but I supports that history study could not only relate to erveryday's life. These kinds of studies sometimes may function after several years or decades of years. So i partially agree with the topic.

To begin with, we should admire that the study of history should start with the purpose that serving the society. Absolutely, society is constituted of the people. The development of the society thanks to the effort of every person, so if the study of history wants to be make benefits for our society, it should be useful of people who constitute to the study. Any study leave the need of people away would not accomplish anything but some unreality theory. For example, some people work on a very strange area, they try to find the relationship between the technology developing and humanities, even there maybe some thing common in these, but it is not necessary to find this relationship. And this research is surely unworthy .

However, even the value of study history based on whether people can take advantage of it, we can not only regard the all kinds of study of history as the helpful tools of people's daily life. Because history is based on the daily life but sometimes beyond daily life. Some of the history studies have no direct relationship with the ordinary people, but helpful to the whole humanbeng's developing. For instance, the study of the current polity events, as we know, the current polity study can not influence your living condition immediately, but we can never say these study has no value. Since these politic evens will affect you in the future such as the economy polity effect the price of daily things. Hence we should not only use the stopping prospect to the value of studying history, but to widen our vista to the history.

What is more, as we know that the purpose of history study can not be weigh by whether it is helpful for people's daily life. What is the standard to evaluate the study of history is worth or not. First, these study of some period of history should have the comparison ability of the ago we living, so when we comparing the two different ages, the experiment of the past history could give us the constructional advise.Further more, the history the history we learned should have the characteristic  that expanding to the all nation as well as shrinking to individual. Many of the history not only useful to a company or a country but also fit for individual. Unfortunately, people has no capacity to take advantage of these information.

To sum up, history study is a complex lesson for people to understand it entirely. living the experiment from the past time is the largest value of history. What we can do is to enhance the knowledge of the history and try to understand the deep contain of these information then take the situation to ourselves. Some of the individuals and events of the history would be another shadow of people in the current age.

Neptune2010UID：2626044

History is a lesson that people studies knowledge with the events and person in the past time, anglicising(?) the cause and result of the historic events and finding out the regulation between every node of the history. If people who can take advantages of the historic experiment, history study would be the best guilder in his life. The author maintain that the study of history is worthy only when the study directly relate to our daily life. First i can not regard this topic as a totally wrong one, but I supports that history study could not only relate to erveryday's life. These kinds of studies sometimes may function after several years or decades of years. So i partially agree with the topic.

To begin with, we should admire that the study of history should start with the purpose that serving the society. Absolutely, society is constituted of the people. The development of the society thanks to the effort of every person, so if the study of history wants to be make benefits for our society, it should be useful of people who constitute to the study. Any study leave the need of people away would not accomplish anything but some unreality(impractical) theory. （不对吧，很多理论研究都目前没有什么用处，但并不是没有价值）For example, some people work on a very strange area, they try to find the relationship between the technology development and humanities, even there maybe some thing common in these, but it is not necessary to find this relationship. And this research is surely unworthy. （不是很明白？ 为什么研究科技和人性的关系式一个very strange area,not necessary,unworthy? 和学习历史之间的关系是？）

However, even the value of study history based on whether people can take advantage of it, we can not only regard the all kinds of study of history as the helpful tools to people's daily life. Because history is based on the daily life but sometimes beyond daily life. Some of the history studies have no direct relationship with the ordinary people, but helpful to the whole human beng's development. For instance, the study of the current polity events（当前的polity events就不是学习历史了吧？）, as we know, the current polity study can not influence your living condition immediately, but we can never say these study has no value. Since these politic evens will affect you in the future such as the economy polity effect the price of daily things. Hence we should not only use the stopping prospect to the value of studying history, but to widen our vista to the history.（例子还是没有和历史搭上关系啊）

What is more, as we know that the purpose of history study can not be weigh by whether it is helpful for people's daily life.（这一句和前面的Any study leave the need of people away would not accomplish矛盾了，应该加一个only） What is the standard to evaluate the study of history？ First, these study of some period of history should have the comparative ability of the age we live, so when we comparing the two different ages, the experiment of the past history could give us the constructive advise like....... Further more, the history we learned should have the characteristic expanding to the all nation as well as shrinking to individual.（具体是什么呢？要说明一下） Many of the history not only useful to a company or a country but also fit for individual. Unfortunately, people has no capacity to take advantage of these information.（为什么have no capacity？）

To sum up, history study is a complex lesson for people to understand it entirely. living the experiment from the past time is the largest value of history. What we can do is to enhance the knowledge of the history and try to understand the deep contain of these information then take the situation to ourselves. Some of the individuals and events of the history would be another shadow of people in the current age.

没有看懂…  论证太抽象，立场是有保留赞成么？~ 而且没有具体的例子说明~ 建议好好修改一下