求解一道新G argument
Since those issues of Newsbeat magazine that featured political news on their front cover were the poorest-selling issues over the past three years, the publisher of Newsbeat has recommended that the magazine curtail its emphasis on politics to focus more exclusively on economics and personal finance. She points to a recent survey of readers of general interest magazines that indicates greater reader interest in economic issues than in political ones. Newsbeat's editor, however, opposes the proposed shift in editorial policy, pointing out that very few magazines offer extensive political coverage anymore.Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.本题中大部分在支持杂志改版，只有最后来了一句，杂志编辑反对改版，按常理来说应该攻击编辑的观点即支持改版，前面的事实全是支持改版的，这要怎么攻击？求指点！ 本帖最后由 萝卜须根多 于 2011-8-11 22:07 编辑
个人想法
题目要求是Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.所以你可以针对支持改版来理论（这个可能需要讨论下，毕竟和以往的思路可能不同）
如果是要反驳不要改版的话，那么也可以说这个编辑自己也说和政治有关的杂志很少了，那么为什么会少？因为读者不感兴趣？如果是这样，不改版杂志的销量就会下降了。
其实我的想法是，只要是你觉得逻辑有问题的都可以反驳啊，不用局限于反驳谁~
不过可能是我想多了哦。。。。 唔 听萝卜酱这么说，也挺有道理哦~~~嗯~~从editor的角度来考虑，这确实也是个破提角度 唉....又是个不甩作文版的孩纸...桑心啊 我觉得这肯定要攻击为什么要改版啊。。因为改版说的多所以自然漏洞就多。。。比如只有一期卖的不好不代表大众不喜欢。还有调查的可靠性？这都是很明显的漏洞啊。。
或者还有反证，就算你说要改版，那么你的改版方向为什么是economics and personal finance。。你是怎么得到这么结论的。。。 1# 0110tan
谢谢！明白了很多 看到另外一个论坛上有解释 说的这个看似一个转折一个相反意见 其实跟publisher的观点一样的 说的是没有人在用大篇幅来报道政治新闻了
页:
[1]