请问argument第二题怎么破题啊，急求！
2. The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys produce up to twice as much of the hormone cortisol, which primes the body for increased activity levels, as do their younger siblings. Firstborn humans also produce relatively high levels of cortisol in stimulating situations (such as the return of a parent after an absence). The study also found that during pregnancy, first-time mother monkeys had higher levels of cortisol than did those who had had several offspring."
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
以下文字摘自一封给某科学期刊编辑的信件。
“出生的顺序会影响到个体的激素水平”，最近，一项针对18 只猕猴
的研究提供了相关的线索。研究显示，当第一个出生的幼猴处在某种
刺激性情景中（比如碰到某只陌生的猴子），它的hormone coritisol分泌量会是它那些年幼的兄弟姐妹的两倍。头胎出生的人类也会
在刺激性情景（比如父母走开一会儿又返回时）中表现出相对更高的
hormone coritisol 分泌水平。这项研究还发现，在怀孕期间，若母猴
是初次怀孕，其hormone coritisol的分泌水平相较于那些已经有多个后代的母猴
会更高。
很想问一下啊
Write a response in which you discuss one or more alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation and explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts presented in the argument.
这句话到底是要我们写什么啊
自己写理由吗？
应该怎样驳？？
感觉和老G完全不同，老G只需要找到逻辑不符的反驳就好，这种要我自己写explanation的该怎么办？
还是反驳出生顺序影响个体激素水平吗 alternative explanations that could rival the proposed explanation---这个就是老G洛基不符处
explain how your explanation(s) can plausibly account for the facts---这个等于就是你反驳的例子还有末尾的结论的一个糅合
其实要求并没有变，添加了一个instruction并不是什么大改变，其实还是那一套 昨天看了下另一版主写的八种问法~大概是明白点了TAT
新G果然是难多了……
不同问法不同写法 3# luchia 不同问法不同写法 差异大么？能否给下那个八种问法分析的版主的链接~ 谢啦~
页:
[1]