关于issue instruction6的小疑问
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.它的意思是不是要着重在consequences上?那么consequences是不是理解为“后果”?于是写作主要是着重建议不好的地方吗?
感觉怪怪的,求助,谢谢! Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
个人觉得,红色部分都是重点,一个是“落实该政策”,一个是“多种可能后果”
个人愚见 跟我的感觉一样,是不是就带有着重“反面”的导向性? 2# okqishi 跟我的感觉一样,是不是就带有着重“反面”的导向性? 2# okqishi
azurejay 发表于 2012-2-26 22:52 https://bbs.gter.net/images/common/back.gif
额。。。没理解你的“反面”是啥意思。。。
个人觉得,Argument题目里面的政策都比较水,于是乎其落实政策后产生的结果都应该不咋样(基本上都不合逻辑)。。。就从这方面去攻击 这个是issue…… 4# okqishi 5# azurejay
我勒个去...事实证明我现在的脑子极度混乱...
Issue的话要根据你自己的立场吧...
唉,乱了乱了... 这个主要是根据自己的立场来啊。如果你持赞成的意见,可以写好的结果,你持反对的意见,可以写不好的结果。不一定非得写不好的结果吧。consequences理解为结果更好吧,不要根据题目来确定自己的立场,要根据自己的立场来决定题目。
页:
[1]