ISSUE5 我的第一篇，求拍
Should a nation require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college? I concede with the speaker that a same national curriculum in some situation has merit, nevertheless, consider the fact that in some other situations where educational resources are not equally distributed , I think this suggestion has shortcomings.Admittedly, in a nation where educational resources are equally distributed, a same national curriculum can bring benefits. First of all, a same national curriculum will bring a national standard examination to measure students from everywhere. As students have same academic background, it's more justify to
measure students' academic potentials based on the result of the examinations. Besides, it's also good for students to help them adapt to different schools. Once they want to change their schools, they don't need to worry the differences between the curriculum which may require extra effort and the differences between
the academic performance measurement.
However, if this policy carried out without noticing the imbalance development among different areas, it may create inequality of education. For those students study in rural areas where local educational institutions don't have sufficient teachers or facilities to carry out quality classes, when they participated in the examination, they would be in disadvantage places. After all, an equal national curriculum can not guarantee an equal distribution of educational resources thus undermines the equality of education.
What's more, a national curriculum may harm students' individual developments. Students have different futures, thus a national curriculum is impossible to satisfy every student's need. Furthermore, isn't it better to prepare a future farmer with knowledge on how to manage his farmer better rather than how to appreciate Shakespeare better? Isn't it better to prepare a future elementary teacher with more knowledge on how to teach rather than how to analysis complex physical problems? (Do you want to indicate that education should respect the individuals? You’d better express explicitly with other examples)
In sum, a national curriculum in a nation where students can receive equal educational resources may be a favorable suggestion. However, take the fact that many nations have imbalance distribution of educational resources and students have variable interests into account, maybe allowing schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer is a better suggestion.
建议好好组织一下语言，注意一些基本语法，理清一下思路。
PS: 希望你能试着去改改别人的文章，互相帮助。版主时间有限，不能一一批改，希望大家发扬互改精神。
首先，你说如果教育资源公平就应该统一教学计划，那如果这个curriculum本身就是2b呢？比如（在中国）一个星期安排30小时英语课10小时数学课完全不教语文历史地理物理化学，就算全国都无比公平的按照这个上效果也可想而知。你哪怕说一句我们假设这个curriculum是科学合理的把底兜住也行啊。顺便说一句，前面这个命题是否成立，无论从正面反面都是大有文章可做的
你说农村地区因为缺乏教学资源无法实现教学效果，那我的问题是：如果让他们自己设定curriculum，你怎么能合理的推测这些地方的学生就能赶上发达地区的学生？教育资源不公平导致的问题是换个教学计划就能改变的吗？
最后关于学生的个性发展，你是否认为各学科一定程度的基础知识是当今社会干什么都必须的？不懂数学物理的记者，不会待人接物的书呆子，甚至痴迷于研究忽视健康英年早逝的科学家。你如何致力于最大限度的避免这些现象的出现？
页:
[1]