ISSUE 25 免费资助上大学，劳烦大家狠狠拍！【已评论 by 版主ok奇】待修改
本帖最后由 zhj0735 于 2012-5-6 13:06 编辑7G选手，第一篇文章，1+小时，还时不时翻阅灵格斯。表示半个小时完成很费劲。:L :mad:
Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
中文提纲：
1.高等教育应该普及至所有人群，包括家庭不富裕的人群。政府政策提供将加快高等教育的发展。
2.高校资金来源完全来自于政府资助，无市场竞争督促，无法提供高校更宽广的平台发展。
3.学生为主题，无经济负担，可能会不重视大学教育。
4.政府可将这部分资金用于建设基础教育。
Exigent demand for talents in every aspect of industry was in rise after Technical Revolution almost in every country. Thus put the higher education forward for basic guarantee and assurance to cultivate more well-educated and qualified citizen to prompt the developing impetus. In this way, the argument demonstrated that university and college education should be provided for free. Whereas the fundamental need for maintain a sustainable society is safety and welfare of the citizen, the suggestion above would be modified.
When higher education as college and university is a symbol for systematical cultural and well-organized career design for explicit and finery work, such as software engineering or biochemical remedy, preempt pursuit for four year study would be worthwhile in the assumption that any pain would be paid. The proposal for free higher education would undoubtedly welcomed by the mass, especially the poverty. Each legitimate individual would have the honor to get access to advanced impartation. The concept was more like the idealism of Communism, that every opportunity for a better life was for granted and shared with identical right and obligation. The advantage is conspicuous that satisfaction for political decision would be arise and people would have more chance for expected job when knowledge for distinct major were to be open to public.
Embarrassingly, the ideal assumption could be encountered reconciliation when many more aspects of society was imperative for funding as well. Given the need hierarchy by A.H.Maslow, intelligible requirement as self-fulfillment by circumference ranked third after physical need and committed safety. The same was for a city or region to operate under accomplishing sound system for social welfare and deploying holistic infrastructure around. Too far across the benign intention to promote level of education, the governor could have in the first ensured elementary instruction and scientific popularization to eliminate the illiteracy. Other respect may include medical treatment or pollution control.
Implemented as the proposal was, Department of Educational would also be undermined since income and revenue for a college was totally come from the government, therefore no marketing competence would existed. Prestigious golden branded college faced with crises of masters and professors outflow, when income would not be flexible due to invariable allocation. In terms of the student, little financial burden may sometimes means arbitrariness in when and how to receive any major of knowledge. Consequently, those who was not so ambitious would end up learning year after year in university, not to think any further about further career design. Not to mention the costly international exchange or studying abroad.
From above elaborated evaluation and analysis, we may get to an conclusion that higher education free of charge supportive by authority would be popularized and welcome for self-fulfilling or career design. While in contrast, market mechanism and fixed income would decline the enthusiasm for teachers and would not have any passion for teaching. Nor did student have the perseverance to seek position in the jungle job. Exigent demand for talents in every aspect of industry was in rise after Technical Revolution almost in every country. Thus put the higher education forward for basic guarantee and assurance to cultivate more well-educated and qualified citizen to prompt the developing impetus. In this way, the argument demonstrated that university and college education should be provided for free. Whereas the fundamental need for maintain a sustainable society is safety and welfare of the citizen, the suggestion above would be modified.
When higher education as college and university is a symbol for systematical cultural and well-organized career design for explicit and finery work, such as software engineering or biochemical remedy, preempt pursuit for four year study would be worthwhile in the assumption that any pain would be paid. The proposal for free higher education would undoubtedly welcomed by the mass, especially the poverty. Each legitimate individual would have the honor to get access to advanced impartation. The concept was more like the idealism of Communism, that every opportunity for a better life was for granted and shared with identical right and obligation. The advantage is conspicuous that satisfaction for political decision would be arise and people would have more chance for expected job when knowledge for distinct major were to be open to public.
Embarrassingly, the ideal assumption could be encountered reconciliation when many more aspects of society was imperative for funding as well. Given the need hierarchy by A.H.Maslow, intelligible requirement as self-fulfillment by circumference ranked third after physical need and committed safety. The same was for a city or region to operate under accomplishing sound system for social welfare and deploying holistic infrastructure around. Too far across the benign intention to promote level of education, the governor could have in the first ensured elementary instruction and scientific popularization to eliminate the illiteracy. Other respect may include medical treatment or pollution control.
Implemented as the proposal was, Department of Educational would also be undermined since income and revenue for a college was totally come from the government, therefore no marketing competence would existed. Prestigious golden branded college faced with crises of masters and professors outflow, when income would not be flexible due to invariable allocation. In terms of the student, little financial burden may sometimes means arbitrariness in when and how to receive any major of knowledge. Consequently, those who was not so ambitious would end up learning year after year in university, not to think any further about further career design. Not to mention the costly international exchange or studying abroad.
From above elaborated evaluation and analysis, we may get to an conclusion that higher education free of charge supportive by authority would be popularized and welcome for self-fulfilling or career design. While in contrast, market mechanism and fixed income would decline the enthusiasm for teachers and would not have any passion for teaching. Nor did student have the perseverance to seek position in the jungle job.
写的不错~
没有看到传统模板的影子，文章中也运用了大量红宝词汇，这两点很难得
再接再厉！
页:
[1]