Issue 6 习作+求11G精炼小组
我是理科11.3G，大头在V，所以倾向于AW精炼的过程，计划每周精写精练一篇issue，反复改。这周自己会先看下ETS范文分析下，下周开始每周1个分类一篇习作，希望有相同理念的人，能一同战斗，每周一个分类下练习，互改也比较好。
下面是我千疮百孔的首作，自己也是第一来GTer发帖。文章是2个月前上完XDF写作课后的习作，之间两个月没有准备AW，最近一直做阅读，觉得从ETS给的阅读文章结构分析来看，-++，并且每段都有各种让步转折对比，自己反复练阅读的时候，以后会更留心下具体的逻辑思路。
如果有其他教育类的文章，也求互改。
A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Since the standards vary largely for colledge to select studends, some peple take into question the fairness due to the disparate courses taken before colledge. Therefore some educators call for the same national curriculum taken before entering the colledge. I assume it partially reasonable while students should be flexible in choosing their subjects.
Some people,who advocate the same courses taken before entering the colledge, belive it will breeds more fairness. If every students study the same materials, it's much easier and fairer to set one standard rules that examing their capacities indifferently. Alternatively,the advantage will disappear to learn certain knowledge,which some students don't use the same books. Moreover, the same corriculum lays a strong foundation for majors in colledge. Studends, before entering the university, may not clearly understant which course is essencial if a nation do not forcefully require them to study the same nation curriculum. Therefore, it seems plausiable to prop it up.
However, those who are for the policy fail to see the disadvantage resulted from implementing the same national curriculum. To be exact, it will decimate the creativity and diveristy of the young. Assuming that we are compelled to learn the same curriculum, we are taught to think and act in a simillar way. Without diverse personalities and characters, how could we contrieve innovative ideas? What's more, the creativity and diversity is salient core points contributing to a nation's thrive.The USA, for example,a nation consists of migrants when different culture steel into each other , rise to the most powerful one via valueing the innovation. Thus, it could boost the creativity of students to let them select various learing materials at their will, which also add thrive to a nation.
Another reason for supporting the diversal courses is that it can help students to find their interest and know themselves better.There is no denying that not everyone share the same gift, which requires various courses to develop. Granted that children forefully attend those classes they feel mudane and a failure, they would waste their time meant to be spent on their gifted fields. That will leads to more failure frusstration and confusion about themselves. But "know thyself", said by Socrates, perhaps is the ultimite goal of education. Implementing the same currilum all over the country, obviously, deprives the students of chance to close to the final purpose. In addition, not all the children will enter the colledge, which means some will not gain the possibility to select which to learn in order to prepare for their future career.
Above all the evidence I list, a nation should provide with students more freedom in choosing the currilum. Considering several vital courses are indesipenssible, I suggest schools open most currilum while selectively set a number of must-learned ones.
如果有其他教育类的文章，也求互改。 还有标题格式不知道对不对，之前看到一篇格式和搜索的文帖子，后来找不到了 up
页:
[1]