（作文互改小组）issue 作文贴 白宝
一楼献给为我改作文的童鞋,谢谢你们！ 2012.12.11Issue 7 some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of arts.
From the extension of worldwide to the regional dimensions, arts expositions have flourished at the unimaginable speed. Whatever it is hold by a individual organization or the government, all attract lots of attention and discusses. Among them, there is a valuable discuss topic: whether government funding can encourage the development of arts.
Some hold this attitude, funding from government ensures flourishing of the arts and makes it available to the public. As we all know, governments have a responsibility to give support to its indigenous arts, which must be the only one who have the financial strength giving such support. Comparing with other private institution or individual organization, governments are capable enough to give aids to the artists. In addition, funding of governments is more impartial and comprehensive to weigh each aspect of the arts fields. Whatever visual arts or auditory arts can be taken into account fairly. Governments' related departments value every part and take their need into consideration, and distribute the funding according to specific requirements. This can be more effective and efficient to use the money. Besides this, though support from governments, arts can not only flourish and ooze particular charms but also be acknowledged by common people. Many institutions established and maintained by governments, such as art museums, public concert halls and so on, could give the common people a chance to approach glamour of arts as a further step.
Absolutely, funding from governments can be disadvantageous too. Governments' assistances can give negative influences as well. When we consider about modern art history, example of disturbances because of governments' financial supports is everywhere. Government had given economical support to those artists and imposed their political view to the creator of arts; thus the pure initial principle of art is stained. Seemingly, governments helped those artists and encouraged art creation, however added underlying interests latently and influenced artists’ attitude of creating imperceptibly. Additionally, financial support from government will in some degree be limiting that strength from individual institutions or private organizations can not play a role in art marketing. Moreover, funding from government is limited that can not give consideration to every aspect which may cause the impartial distribution happen.
Concerning about the negative influences, I still give my vote to the first standpoint: to a great extent, government funding will make the arts flourished and bring its glamour to everyone. According to current trade, most government funding have benefited the public and lots of artists. It gives opportunities to every person who loves art but do not have the chance to approach and appreciate the elegant art pieces, as well as to those artists want to chase their own art dream but limited by financial troubles. Most of the time government funding do not influence the art creation in negative ways. On the contrary, this kind of standpoint still needs more evidences to be proved.
As long as we take this measure will authentic attitude and in intelligent ways, arts in all kinds will be benefited and flourishing. If we find out ways to use the fund moderately and wisely, it must product benefits and the advantages could outweigh the disadvantages.
再传一次 改好，请回改...谢谢... 白宝 发表于 2012-12-12 08:12 static/image/common/back.gif
再传一次
2012.12.17 楼主，我帮你改了作文，一定要看噢~ 楼主。我帮你改的作文。一定要看噢~~ 木棉袈裟 发表于 2012-12-22 20:16 static/image/common/back.gif
楼主。我帮你改的作文。一定要看噢~~
谢谢你！ 2013.2.13 求改，谢！
唉，但是字数太少。。。 题目要求在这里
Issue 131:Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Issue 132:Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented. 楼主，我帮你改的作文。 partialperson 发表于 2013-2-13 14:39 static/image/common/back.gif
求改，谢！
唉，但是字数太少。。。
白宝 发表于 2013-2-13 10:52 static/image/common/back.gif
2013.2.13
本人小白一名，胡言乱语，仅供参考
页:
[1]
2