想问问对于问题太多的argument怎么处理呢
感觉有些时候一篇argument可以抨击的地方好多啊，应该不可能都写出来，应该写哪些呢？比如像
A55
"Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey asked video-game players what features they thought were most important in a video game. According to the survey, players prefer games that provide lifelike graphics, which require the most up-to-date computers. Whirlwind has just introduced several such games with an extensive advertising campaign directed at people ten to twenty-five years old, the age-group most likely to play video games. It follows, then, that the sales of Whirlwind video games are likely to increase dramatically in the next few months." 可以把这些漏洞作逻辑排序，看看哪些是大前提，哪些是小前提，以及它们是平行关系还是前后推导关系，找最重要、最有针对性的进行攻击。详见
https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=412534&fromuid=3399223 qwe1__rty2 发表于 2013-4-11 09:18 static/image/common/back.gif
可以把这些漏洞作逻辑排序，看看哪些是大前提，哪些是小前提，以及它们是平行关系还是前后推导关系，找最重 ...
好的 谢谢 赞一下沙发
页:
[1]