第一次写issue，希望大神帮忙改改
When asked about whether a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, it is troublesome for people to achieve consensus owing to their dissimilar individual experience and incompatible world outlook, for the students all have the right to acquire the same national curriculum, but still have the right to choose what they are interested in. Therefore, I would argue that the best way is to permit the students to choose academic classes on their own but still require the students to study the compulsory lessons determined by the nation.Indeed, a nation requiring all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college has some advantages. On the individual level, every student can get the elementary knowledge, thus starting at same level when they enroll into college .On the social level, the government will maintain the equality of the education, preventing enlarging the gaps between different places. At the same time, it will also give convenience for the college to enact lessons.
On the contrary, what nation does can also cause some quandaries on the feasibility and advantage. On feasible level, first, different people have different personalities, so when we demand all of students to learn the same curriculum will squelch the children originality, thus causing no beneficial things for personal development. Second, there are disparate economical level in different districts, therefore, when it comes to setting the same curriculum ,it seems to be unrealistic in that in developed districts they can open the computer class ,swimming class and so on. By contrast, the poor districts don't have the conditions to do this. On advantageous level, most of nation are made up by overwhelming majority of cultures, so the same national curriculum may come about culture conflict. Even there isn't, to say the least, culture conflict. The diversity and culture inheritance will no doubt be undermined seriously, and finally fade away because of the same national curriculum.
In fact ,the true education is that it hinges on the need of reality and future and obey the developing discipline of the young people ,purposely, organizationally and systematically, to instruct the young people to attain knowledge, and ultimately make the young people become the one the society needs. Therefore, on the one hand, the nation should focus on the fundamental lessons such as moral lessons and math, making them be the compulsory national curriculum .On the other hand, the districts should rely on their own conditions to arrange the curriculum to satisfy the students' need. In conclusion, the above-discussed reasons should to the large extent justify my claim that a compulsory curriculum with discretionary class education system is needed.
第一次写，用了一个小时，自己也改了下，希望大神看看，最后一段是翻译百度关于教育的定义，不知正确不？真正的教育是根据一定社会的现实和未来的需要，遵循年轻一代身心发展的规律，有目的、有计划、有组织、系统地引导受教育者获得知识技能，陶冶思想品德、发展智力和体力的一种活动，以便把受教育者培养成为适应一定社会（或一定阶级）的需要和促进社会发展的人
忘记写题目了！1. A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 你好像没写题目的写作要求
有兴趣可来这里自评习作
我会提供反馈
王老师互改小组-评估自己的issue与Argument习作
https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1777362&fromuid=2191404
页:
[1]