Issue69 Political leaders withhold information from the public
本帖最后由 杨家齐 于 2014-12-2 02:02 编辑本帖来自"14年秋季GRE提纲+全文互改小组"，欢迎关注！你还可以查看更多小组、创建小组69) Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
相关题目：无
请回帖时按照指引( https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1777364-1-1.html )列出英语提纲并用汉语解释并根据指引点评楼上的提纲。 第一个回帖的同学不必点评 原题：69) Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
我的思路：1，政府的信息是否改披露给大众应该取决于信息的属性feature；2，跟大众切身利益相关的信息需要被披露；3，有威胁国家或领导人安全的信息不能被披露。
讨论后的思路：信息的属性feature of information概念难以界定，可以改为取决于披露信息可能产生的后果consequences of releasing the information。1，威胁国家安全的信息不能被披露；2，无关痛痒的信息无需被披露；3，有争议的信息，需要进一步被言明论证的信息需要被披露。
规律和方法：1，在酝酿写作思路时，若遇到难以论述清楚的概念，可以进一步去考虑，比如在考虑如何界定信息的feature时，进一步想到可以按照不同feature的信息将产生的consequence来分类写作；2，表达上的问题要参考语料库，尽量用自己看到过的表达；3，举例不一定要名人名言，可以引入思想实验，假设性例子。
占楼回答问题
页:
[1]