Issue 27 In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to
本帖最后由 lisa_C 于 2014-12-6 00:27 编辑本帖来自"14年秋季GRE提纲+全文互改小组"，欢迎关注！你还可以查看更多小组、创建小组27) In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
相关题目：无
请回帖时按照指引( https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1777364-1-1.html )列出英语提纲并用汉语解释并根据指引点评楼上的提纲。 第一个回帖的同学不必点评 本帖最后由 lisa_C 于 2014-12-6 01:09 编辑
Issue 27
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contribution.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
我的原思路：
Thesis Sentence: Beginners play important role in fields like arts and computer science which emphasize more on creative thinking, but experts are more likely to have significant contribution in fields which required accumulated knowledge. But in any field, beginners and experts should compete on an equal basis.
TS1: To begin with, in fields that emphasize more on creative thinking – for example, arts, and computer science – beginners are more brave to challenge convention in this field and make breakthrough.
TS2: In fields that acquire solid fundamental of knowledge such as pure science research, however, it is not easy for beginners to have better achievement than expert.
（纯理论研究需要扎实的知识基础，譬如物理和数学）
TS3: Even though probabilities of beginners to make important contributions are various in different fields, to bolster social development, opportunities should open for both experts and beginners.
(有时候无知无畏者才能提示真相，靠近真相本身对每个领域都是适用的)
原思路问题和感悟：
写三段式我有一个固定思维，在前两段分类或是分层次之后总想要在第三段升华，有时候合适但是有时候容易偏离重点模糊结构，在时间有盈余的情况下但写无妨但是在时间有限情况下还是最好三段式，先结构清楚完整比较好，重点在要切题和结构清晰论证完整。
讨论结果：
采取一边倒的思路，认为beginners确实比experts更容易有重要的contribution。
通常有motivation, updated knowledge, concentration的人易获得突破性成果。
TS1： experts在motivation方面比beginners低
（大多成就在博士期间得到，有成就之后的experts奋斗的动力比较小）
TS2: beginners精力旺盛，更喜欢去接触也更容易掌握最新的技术和知识。
TS3: experts比beginner更不能concentrate。
（所在职位和social activities多的关系，不能专心科研）
这题也可以采取完全相反的观点，ＴＳ相应换一下就好，只要论证时能够支持观点。 占楼回答问题 支持experts的提纲：
TS：虽然新手有时候会有突破，但是由于成果的出现需要【经验积累】【知识储备】，因此还是以专家得出居多
ts1: Sometime so-called green hands can make breakthrough because of their unlimited way of thinking and fearless ambition to succeed. （我好想举曹冲称象的例子啊。。）1.数学家由于常常被已有的思路限制，解题陷入僵局，一个数学天才儿童却又different solutions；2. 在体育竞技中，年轻的黑马出于对胜利的渴望，而专家已经疲于争夺，能取到suprising record
ts2: However, generally speaking, large amount of experience is needed as one of the prerequisites for success. 举例challenging surgery，需要医生的丰富实战经验，新手很有可能抗不过精神压力；心理学成果，建立在丰富的观察和沟通经验，新手可能会emotional treating或者act like an academic bigot
ts3:Moreover, due to lack of well-built system of basic knowledge, beginners lose their prior position on academic inquiry. 举例对于历史上某个人物的理解，需要interdiscplinary的知识；举例对于文学作品的理解，需要对当时社会的情况了解，和同时代作品的比较等 这个题目可以算作是和issue 9近似吗？ Kssandra 发表于 2015-5-24 12:19 static/image/common/back.gif
这个题目可以算作是和issue 9近似吗？
9) In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Issue 27
In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contribution.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
只能说有点关系
页:
[1]