标题: Issue26 [you are not alone]小组提纲作业 [打印本页] 作者: Luise8891 时间: 2010-10-3 10:43:37 标题: Issue26 [you are not alone]小组提纲作业
26"Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."
26"Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."
中文解释：大多数人都会同意建筑是任何过去社会的珍贵记录。但是当旧的建筑矗立在那些现代设计者认为可以更好用于现代用处的时候，争议四起。在这些情形下，为了现代的需要能够得到满足，现代的发展比历史建筑的保留更应该给予优先权。
Position:Old buildings are best history book of a past society.To protect this valuable record of history, we should strive to preserve the old bildings.However, without considering the contemporary needs, simply preserving all the old buildings seems inappropriate.Therefore, we need to make a comprehensive evaluation about which is more important between the presevation of old buildings and the mordern development.
论据：1)No one can deny the importance of preserving an old building.历史瑰宝：The fobidden city,and pyramid in Egypt, and white house in U.S.,etc.普通的老建筑：Peking quadrangle dwellings,
2)equally important, mordern needs should be served.public transportation, modern buildings, and public facilities, and energy plant etc.
3)to over exaggerate its value is inappropriate, whether it's saving an old building or building a modern facility.like some old, dilapidated building without much value of history. or an insignificant or dispensible modern building.
4)when we are facing a nerve-wracking dilemma that we have to give precedence to whether keeping an old building or serving an modern meeds, there is always a comparison involved and then a compromise reachs.two examples:1)the peking quadrangle dewellings are being destroyed.maybe in the future, we can only watch it in the museum.2) the three gorges project in China.Considering its great benefit, to build this projec is totally worthy.
In conclusion, we can not oversimplify the choice we make. Instead, we need to be fullly aware that what we are going to lose and win if we give up the old building to serve the modern needs.Always a good evaluation need to be done, before the final decision is made.作者: 刘文奇 时间: 2010-10-4 02:52:09
issue 26
"Most people would agree that buildings represent a valuable record of any society's past, but controversy arises when old buildings stand on ground that modern planner feel could be better used for modern purposes. In such situations, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings so that contemporary needs can be served."
大多数人都同意一个社会的建筑物代表了它有价值的历史记录，但是当现代规划者们觉得这些以前的建筑物所占据的土地可以被更有价值的使用于新目的时，就产生了争议，现代发展应该比保留历史建筑物更受重视以便于满足眼下的要求。
Position：Even though modern development is important for contemporary people to improve the standard of living, the preservation of historic buildings should not give way to the modern purpose when they are contradictory to each other. In fact, under many circumstance, historic buildings can facilitate modern development.
Point one: the important of modern development. argument1: modernlization can creation employment opportunities and ensue facilitate living standard. argument2: modernization can expand our life expectance and improve medical treatment, even if you are badly injured; there is a high possibility that you will be rescued. Argument 3:morderlization make it possible to travel around the world. The advance of transportation makes you free to wherever you want in a short time.
Point two: the necessary for us to preservation historic buildings. argument1: to remember past. argument 2: an architecture . argument3: relics to attract tourists.
point three: the historic building is not necessarily impede modernization. We can make the historic building serve the purpose of modernization with some specific ways.