Do you agree ordisagree, it is better to relax by watching a movie or reading a book than bydoing physical exercise.
第一感觉是字数有点少。
T What kind of activities would you prefer to relax yourself,sitting down to watch something or doing some sports? Both of them hold theirbenefits. As far as I am concerned, watching a movie or reading a book comfortsus more than doing exercises for （the reason that） we can both having a rest and getting someknowledge during the whole process.
`* [. X! l Firstly, sitting down quietly and concentrating on the storiesin movies or books can eliminate the worry in one’s mind which is the nature ofrelax. After knowing this, some humorous or harmonyharmonious movies and novels are recommendable. For illustration, several days ago, I watched the movie named TheSmurfs after the quarreling with a friend. The lovely actions, intelligentideas and kind hearts of smurfs touched me so much that I forgot theunhappiness between me and my friend. Furthermore, the smurfs’ unity of familyalso imparted me that friends need to understand and help each other去掉 ratherthan blame. Secondly, since the essential aim is to relax ourselves, it is fundamentalto notice that we need to let not only the physical but the psychologicalcondition to rest in pleasant atmosphere. If we going to do some exercise, no matterhow hard it is, there will be some energy from bodies consumed. Each of us hasthe experiences that we become more tiered on the physical aspect after sports activities.Also, we may keep considering the issues that bother us while we are running,which will put a harder pressure on the shoulder of our minds.6 u, O! Q& G. R' Y5 n# ~! y a All in all, as for the benefits for both physical and spiritualrelax I agree with the speaker that watching a movie or reading a book isbetter. To relax, we should choose something that is easy to accomplish and hasnot a bit disadvantages for bodies. 句式和思路都不错 但建议每段都扩充一些，或者在增加点理由作者: zhangbao0607 时间: 2011-8-18 12:24:52
The lecture discussed the phenomenon of less readers of literatures than before. Some causes and effects are taken into account. However it is in the opposite direction of the passages' claims in（from） three aspects as showed below.（第二句HOWEVER后句子太长了，主谓宾有点混乱）
First, the professor in the lecture claims that not only the literatures can provide the intellectual stimulations (+but aslo..).not only but also 最好连用，否则觉得句子说了一半） According to some vivid examples, books like the scientific, political ones and so forth are also in high quality. They can enhance the intellective levels of people as well. However, this is different from the ideas in the passage which indicates that reading less literature will lower the intellectual benefits.（这一段再看看，我咋觉得文章里是说BOOK销量降低了就说是文学作品销量少了，但是听力里说，其实还有很多其他形式的文学作品的。。我再回头看看）
Second, the professor in the lecture dose（does） not agree with the position in the reading that the level of culture in general is lowered. The speaker concerned the culture is just changed into a station（situation?） that it can be revealed in many other forms except for （beside, except for应该是不包含后面那个名词了吧）literatures. Fantastic music, wonderful movies can also be precious part of the culture and they are even more beneficial to the general. There is no evidence to show the level is lowered. (我觉得是不是用lower就好了)。
Third, the lecture holds the point that the tendency of less readers than before may resulted from the authors’ writing ability. （应该不是写作能力，而是说写出来的东西读者读不懂）This is another part that is not in consistence with the reading that(which)
it （it多余）believes (it is the删除) （that）less audience leads the difficulties to（of）( the writers to删除)(literatures’ publication) 最后一句句子太长了而且穿插了很多定语从句和强调句，让人看了有点CONFUSED,最好断个句）作者: alohasally 时间: 2011-8-22 22:44:00
Perhaps, few people can deny that the improvements of our society are affected by numerous things, idealisms and so on. When it comes more accurate(为什么是这个词，影响更准确？） to weigh the influence of books and televisions, I hold the opinion that books have less effect on the society than TVs for the aspects of story retelling ability and attraction to all audience.
As is known to all, since the replayed truth in televisions are so wide and virtual that they always leave impressed（deeply） impressions, or even shocks, on the society. While an affair with educating or public meanings is told on TVs, not only the outline was narrative, but also together with appropriate music and real images or videos. None of this can be perfectly depicted in a book. For illustration, the recording program named Environment has once described the sufferings that are underwent by the deer in the Tibet, all around the whole society began to appealing the protections of deer there, which are totally brought about by the startling videos of the living situation of deer.
In addition, televisions serve a strong force to each class, ages, or genders in the society to impart something to the public only because it has more visional attractions than books. Consider the various programs on the TVs as examples. No matter it is a recording program, TV play, competition show or even an advertisement, it will tell people something in a subtle way that have influence to the society at any time. Each class of people could find their favorite programs on TV easily and furthermore may be addicted to it. This convenience and attraction from TV are to people is what a friendly teacher to them.(用这段的例子很好。但是和你这段的论点不符，电视更有视觉吸引力这个论点又和第一段重复了。建议换一个和例子更相符的观点。)
Nevertheless, we are not denying the impulse from books. Books are often said to the forever bright light from the destination. Once we find the kind and the individual book we like most, several information can be absorbed from it time after time. The more times we read it, the more different things we can be taught. Such a long-term progress is also an effective method to the society.GOOD
To sum up, when it comes to the influence that the books and televisions have on the society, televisions outweigh books. We appreciate the whole lively stories that are repeated in television programs. Its attraction to everyone in the society is also inevitable.作者: xieqy0326 时间: 2011-8-24 08:38:29
我来了~~~作者: cederica 时间: 2011-8-24 11:07:31
Books have more influence on society than television.
Perhaps, few people can deny that the improvements of our society are affected by numerous things, idealisms and so on. When it comes more accurate to weigh the influence of books and televisions, I hold the opinion that books have less effect on the society than TVs for the aspects(aspect) of story retelling ability and attraction to all audience.
As is known to all, since the replayed truth in televisions are so wide and virtual that they always leave impressed impressions, or even shocks, on the society. While an affair with educating or public meanings is told on TVs, not only the outline was narrative, but also together with appropriate music and real images or videos. None of this can be perfectly depicted in a book. For illustration, the recording program named Environment has once described the sufferings that are underwent by the deer in the Tibet, all around the whole society began to appealing the protections of deer there, which are totally brought about by the startling videos of the living situation of deer.
In addition, televisions serve a strong force to each class, ages, or genders in the society to impart something to the public only because it has more visional attractions than books. Consider the various programs on the TVs as examples. No matter it is a recording program, TV play, competition show or even an advertisement, it will tell people something in a subtle way that have influence to the society at any time. Each class of people could find their favorite programs on TV easily and furthermore may be addicted to it. This convenience and attraction from TV are to people is what a friendly teacher to them.（这个句子是不是有点拗口?）
Nevertheless（与上文没有转折关系), we are not denying the impulse from books. Books are often said to the forever bright light from the destination. Once we find the kind and the individual book we like most, several information can be absorbed from it time after time. The more times we read it, the more different things we can be taught. Such a long-term progress is also an effective method to the society.（这段说books的好处，突出不了你赞成TV比books更有影响力）
To sum up, when it comes to the influence that the books and televisions have on the society, televisions outweigh books. We appreciate the whole lively stories that are repeated in television programs. Its attraction to everyone in the society is also inevitable.
（这个作文题目，主要是探讨哪个的影响力更大，所以最好多点对比，侧重点强点比较好吧，文章的结构和语言都不错，就是感觉观点不够强） 作者: alohasally 时间: 2011-8-24 22:07:15
Several arguments are quoted in the lecture to challenge the notion in the passage that there will be fewer and fewer birds according to human activities. As regards the urban progress, agriculture and pesticides using situations, the professor believes the population of birds could(would)
not reduce(fast) in the future as discussed below.lecture里讲鸟不会减少的很快，如果过could not reduce会不会太绝对了？
Firstly, the speaker in the lecture has the assertion that the settlement and urban development may make better and larger areas for some birds to live. On the base of (Based on the)
examples of sea gulls and pigeons on streets, she suggests that some type of birds may shrink, whereas others may have a better life in towns and the population can increase as well. This casts doubts on the opinion in the reading that all kinds of birds’ population will reduce in terms of human’s expand.
Secondly, as for the aspect that agriculture will cover more and more lands that used to be habitats for birds hence destroy birds families, the speaker in the lecture dose not agree. She indicates that agriculture in the future calls for less area than before. Each year, the lands are(删掉)
used for cultivating crops in the United States are fewer and fewer(听力里面好像说的是less) . The development will concentrate on productivity of each unit of lands (land). Thus, she concludes that the number of birds will not be affected by agriculture in the coming years.
Finally, according to the lecture, it is reasonable that pesticides are(were)
used so(too)
often before, but this trend will not continue to the future, from which the birds will suffer less harm from the pesticides. New more environmental kinds of pesticides will be researched for the crops in fields. And people are working for(on)
some pest resistant crops so that no more chemical pesticides are necessary for them. In the end(As a result), crops cannot be destroyed by chemical things. Neither will the birds. This is in contrast to the notion in the passage that birds will be killed or prevented from reproducing because of pesticides.作者: bill5865 时间: 2011-8-25 10:59:23