Sparva, unlike Treland’s other provinces, requires automobile insurers to pay for any
medical treatment sought by someone who has been involved in an accident; in the
other provinces, insurers pay for nonemergency treatment only if they preapprove the
treatment. Clearly, Sparva’s less restrictive policy must be the explanation for the fact
that altogether insurers there pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers
in other provinces, even though Sparva does not have the largest population.
7. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument? A Car insurance costs more in Sparva than in any other province. B The cost of medical care in Sparva is higher than the national average. C Different insurance companies have different standards for determining what constitutes emergency treatment. D Fewer insurance companies operate in Sparva than in any other province. E There are fewer traffic accidents annually in Sparva than in any of the provinces of comparable or greater population.
这道题不是太明白，the most strengthens the argument?不是说Sparva province的treatments for accidents is more than other provices in Treland吗？
请高手能不能解释详细点。
看来自己的逻辑思维能力不够好啊。作者: 我是必胜客 时间: 2011-11-7 09:22:55
我看后面的解释是：
One obvious explanation for there being more medical treatments in
Sparva is that there are more accidents there. Choice E rules out that explanation. So
Choice E strengthens the argument in the passage and is the correct answer.
自己别在这里了，就是转不过来弯！作者: 我是必胜客 时间: 2011-11-7 16:04:53