寄托家园留学论坛

标题: 陈虎平逻辑10套Ex3第三题求翻译求解释！！ [打印本页]

作者: SharonGREkiller 时间: 2012-7-5 14:06:44 标题: 陈虎平逻辑10套Ex3第三题求翻译求解释！！

Juries in criminal trials do not base verdict on uncorroborated testimony given by any one witness. rightly so, because it is usually prudent to be highly skeptical of unsubstantiated claims made by any one person. but then, to be consistent, juries should end an all-to-common practice: convicting defendants on the basis of an uncorroborated full confession.

逻辑support题，以下哪个strengthen.
我选的c: defendants sometimes make full confession when they did in fact do what they are accused of doing and have come to believe that the prosecutor has compelling proof of this
答案是d: highly suggestible people who are accused of wrongdoing sometimes become so unsure of their own recollection of the past that they can come to accept the accusations made against them.

求解释啊！！！！尤其是求翻译！！！文章完全没看懂。。。

作者: Forgates 时间: 2012-7-5 23:40:51

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: SharonGREkiller 时间: 2012-7-6 09:34:33

Forgates 发表于 2012-7-5 23:40
选C的话，楼主应该还是能看懂的吧，题目有点绕而已，我觉得关键在最后一句话“convicting defendants on th ...

嗯，但是“become so unsure of their own recollection of the past”要在哪里体现呢？文章中没有讲到犯人对自己过去做过什么回忆不清啊..是这么理解吧..

作者: Forgates 时间: 2012-7-7 15:52:18

提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

欢迎光临寄托家园留学论坛 (https://bbs.gter.net/)