寄托家园留学论坛

标题: 【独立写作】Sinbo_Chan的作业贴 [打印本页]

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-2 22:44:44 标题: 【独立写作】Sinbo_Chan的作业贴

本帖最后由 Sinbo_Chan 于 2012-10-24 10:59 编辑

都在这了

作者: 喵呜~ 时间: 2012-10-3 22:13:47

抱歉哦我今天一整天没回宿舍没碰电脑我现在才开始改抱歉改晚了

作者: fd笑笑 时间: 2012-10-3 23:15:43

对不起，改晚了~~原谅~~

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-4 00:24:17

fd笑笑发表于 2012-10-3 23:15
对不起，改晚了~~原谅~~

很受益，谢谢了

作者: 喵呜~ 时间: 2012-10-4 07:04:13

好了改出来了 [attach]191355[/attach]

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-4 09:01:22

252132618 发表于 2012-10-4 07:04
好了改出来了

非常感谢呀

作者: 吸收阳光 时间: 2012-10-4 11:35:37

[attach]191365[/attach]

作者: zhh358 时间: 2012-10-4 13:57:52

写得不错，小问题还是不少。
加油！！！希望你能给我狠批我的文章，谢啦~

作者: Flaviapq 时间: 2012-10-4 20:08:18

已改。

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-7 17:18:38

10.7

作者: carino 时间: 2012-10-8 16:57:00

[attach]191646[/attach]
改好啦~麻烦你也修改下我的作文吧~：）

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-8 17:40:34

carino 发表于 2012-10-8 16:57
改好啦~麻烦你也修改下我的作文吧~：）

稍后上传，现在才下到

作者: EmmaXu.95 时间: 2012-10-8 18:22:40

改好了哈

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-9 09:13:29

10.8

作者: B因子大片段 时间: 2012-10-13 10:10:16

为啥我看不多今天凌晨给你发的修改。。。？
新手上路，只能直接复制粘贴，估计是被系统吞了

作者: B因子大片段 时间: 2012-10-13 10:12:31

积分终于赚到51分，可以发附件了！
lz看这里~~~

作者: TinaWang1 时间: 2012-10-13 23:41:45

[attach]191979[/attach]已改

作者: April181 时间: 2012-10-15 11:07:40

改好啦~~
[attach]192067[/attach]

作者: mpromanus 时间: 2012-10-16 01:32:11

10.14

Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? To increase economic growth, government can neglect environmental concerns.

Nowadays there is a fierce debate (a debate about what?) and someone consider that the government can neglect the damage of environment (This means the damage is done BY the environment..what you wanted to express would actually be 'the damage TO the environment'.) to develop its economy and they (Who are THEY? 'someone' is singular, 'the government' is also singular. There's no plural noun in this sentence that 'they' can refer to.) can list sound reasons to support that. However, I vote for the statement that it's stupid to talk about this topic (You're talking about it right now..What others have to say about this issue are their 'opinions', not 'topics'. The issue you're discussing, regardless of the opinions you or other people have about it, is 'the topic'. And, please learn to never call anything 'stupid' in public. You can insult people's opinions by saying things like 'unfounded' and 'irrelevant' and 'incorrect', but 'stupid' is an insult to the person – and that's politically incorrect.) because the truth is absolutely that we should protect the environment not to be damaged (Repetition with 'protect'.), it's helpful to each person, generation, and country.

To begin with, the damage of environment will do harm to each person who is the basis of the national industries and economy. Maybe people can get big wealth ('big' refers to physical size and not the size of abstract things like 'wealth', except in idiomatic expressions like 'big money'. If you must use the word 'wealth', it should be 'a large amount of wealth' – but I'd say just use 'wealthy', or 'very wealthy', or 'extremely wealthy'.) from the environment, For example, they kill the animals and sell them, or cut down the timber (Wood only becomes 'timber' after it's cut down, so you can't cut down 'timber', but only cut down 'trees'.) to make furniture, or even use a (If you say 'THE toxic chemical', you mean there's a particular, specific chemical that you expect the reader to know – you don't mean that, so the article is 'a'. You have a rather poor grasp on articles so please revise their usage.) toxic chemical material ('chemical' itself is a noun.) to obtain gold from rocks, and so forth. But such actions will make more people easily ill, because of the muddy air, and polluted water. At this time, people have to spend more money to take care of their health, let alone to make contributions to the economy. Each person's life will suffer seriously threats.(I don't see how this sentence relates to the previous one.) So in this case we can see the important influence of the environment, which is the fundamental stone construct the building of society (This, is a very direct translation. In English you simply don't say things like that – you'd say '..which is a cornerstone in the construction of a society'.). Only when people have the long horizon (No, this is not the way to say what you want to say either. It should be 'foresight'.) and protect the environment, it will do good to economic development.

Secondly, the damage of environment also will do harm to the next generation which is also detrimental to the development of economy. As we all know that, In some African countries, people dig holes everywhere to find the gold sand (I'm not sure exactly what kind of gold you're talking about, because gold doesn't always naturally occur in 'sand' form, but if you mean the kind of gold mining where people sift for small gold pieces in rivers, it's called 'placer gold'. Otherwise, you could just say 'to find gold'. Whether it's 'sand' or not doesn't really have much importance for this discussion.), and fire trees ('fire' as a verb does NOT mean 'to set on fire' any more, except in 'to fire a beacon'. Now it mostly means 'to set an explosive' as in 'fire a gun/cannon'.) to fertileize the land. We can image that what their children generation could depend on to develop economy when they grow up in the future. There is no tree they can fire, no gold they can find, only barren and polluted land left. From this we can conclude that how the importance of recycle of environment (I'm not sure what this phrase means.) is which can determine aeconomy's lifetime.

The last but not the least I want to say is that, more concerning (This is a progressive form, NOT a noun/gerund that means the same thing as 'the act of being concerned'.) of the environment also increases the rise (You can't 'increase the rise' of something. You can only 'increase the rate of the rise' of something.) of a nation's economy directly. For example, a favorable environment can attract many tourists to visit or live and which can promote the income of the country. For instance, today more and more Chinese people like to visit Japan. Japan is a country which has little resource that it's impossible they can develop economy by consuming nature. On contrast, a/the picturesque natural environment helps a lot to the Japanese economy.(You can say 'helps the Japanese economy a lot', but 'helps a lot to the Japanese economy' is bad.)

To sum up, the environment is a main factor people should concerned when there is a ramification (A 'ramification' is a consequence that grows out of something else as if a branch grows from another branch. So a ramification is not 'between' two things but is one thing 'from' another.) between environment protection and economy development, because the environment have a far-reaching significance on each person, generation, and country.

总结：

你的论述没有问题但是全篇表意很费力，就是，我知道你想说什么但是你说的方式要么非常中式表达化，经常有累赘的现象，要么是不顾词性地把词语用在一起。。另外语法上对冠词的掌握和对动介词组搭配的掌握比较差。还有很重要的一点：千万不要直接说对方的观点stupid，这属于政治不正确，咳咳。。

作者: 森野夜 时间: 2012-10-16 07:55:33

10.14不好意思晚了

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-16 08:38:15

mpromanus 发表于 2012-10-16 01:32
10.14

Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? To increase economic growth, govern ...

非常感谢了

作者: niewenjuan123sd 时间: 2012-10-18 17:29:47

加油

作者: 我爱寄托爱我 时间: 2012-10-23 19:01:29

水平有限，不对的地方多包涵

作者: niewenjuan123sd 时间: 2012-10-24 14:02:31

加油

作者: Sinbo_Chan 时间: 2012-10-24 14:39:06

niewenjuan123sd 发表于 2012-10-24 14:02
加油

我也知道自己写的很烂~~~

作者: niewenjuan123sd 时间: 2012-10-24 16:04:21

Sinbo_Chan 发表于 2012-10-24 14:39
我也知道自己写的很烂~~~

加油都有个过程没事

作者: Darren_Van 时间: 2012-10-25 16:27:38

已改~
[attach]192550[/attach]

欢迎光临寄托家园留学论坛 (https://bbs.gter.net/)