Topic：Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now.
When i went into supermarket at 8:00 this morning, i found that all of magazines' front pages were filled with Fang Zuming(Chenglong's son) and Wen Zhang(chinese actor). From my perspective, celebrities are public person, which means that their life have to be transparent.
First of all, before they choose to be a famous person, they already known they have no privacy for their extremely high salaries. In other word, they are public consumer goods. For instance, it is an earthshaking news that Cheng Long's son was chased for taking drugs in Beijing. Ironically, Cheng Long is a Drug Control ambassador. If Cheng Long is a ordinary people, no one would concentrate on his son. For another reason, everyone like seeking novelty. People have fun with watching celebrities' scandals.
Besides, as Hegel said:"only in the state does man have a rational existence." Everything exist reasonably. We find a common situation that when a new movie is published leading actor and leading actress always fall in love with each other in real life. In term of economics, it accords with the relation between supply and demand. Movie merchant need to catch public eyes and people love to see this kind of news although most of them are fabricated.
In addition, celebrities are models for public. People would keep watchful eyes on their every movement. Once their life are not in the right track, people would be disappointed with them. For example, the news that Wen Zhang, Mr. right for all girls, betrayed her wife, filled with media all over the world. The ideal image in public broke down.
All in all, when they choose to be a celebrities they choose life without privacy. And a celebrities, an example for public, must have to pay great attention on their image because everyone will keep eyes on them. 作者: charminglv 时间: 2014-8-27 10:58:52