The author clearly supports the causes he writes about, but he is more a narrator than (i)______. Some say he should have included more (ii)______, but he is wise to let the fact speak for themselves. They are complex enough to prompt many kinds of interpretation, and he would bog down the complicated tale if he tried to adjudicate all of their competing claims.
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
A. a reporter D. statistical data
B. an advocate E. analysis of events
C. an adversary F. detailed descriptions
Architecture scholar Sandy McCreery recently argued that traffic congestion, far from being a sign of urban (i)______, is a mark of urban (ii)______; congestion promotes contemplation of our surroundings and provides us with a shared experience, thereby fulfilling the essential task of the city.
Blank (i) Blank (ii)
A. plentitude D. ambition
B. decline E. privation
C. excitement F. health 作者: Lester_ 时间: 2016-11-11 18:51:36
个人思路是：
1. clearly supports/ more a narrator than --> advocate
“作者明显是支持他所写的那些原因，但他更多的是只去叙述[事件]，而非去鼓吹[这些原因的正确性]” （A报道者和C反对者都不是很合适的样子）
should have included more/ let the fact speaks for themselves --> analysis of events
有的人认为作者应该多做一些事件的分析，但他只是让事实自己说明问题。（后文的interpretation和competing claims也暗指这种[带有主观成分的]analysis）
