请问楼主机考的评分标准是什么？作者: phelps 时间: 2004-7-27 10:43:38 标题: SCORING GUIDE FOR PRESENT YOUR PERSPECTIVE ON AN ISSUE
GRE ESSAY SCORING GUIDE: PERSPECTIVE ON AN ISSUE SCORE
6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated analysis of the complexities of the issue and demonstrates mastery of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--develops a position on the issue with insightful reasons and/or persuasive examples
--sustains a well-focused, well-organized discussion
--expresses ideas clearly and precisely
--uses language fluently, with varied sentence structure and effective vocabulary
--demonstrates superior facility with the conventions (grammar, usage, and mechanics) of standard written English but may have minor flaws
5 A 5 paper presents a well-developed analysis of the complexities of the issue and demonstrates a strong control of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--develops a position on the issue with well-chosen reasons and/or examples
--is focused and generally well organized
--expresses ideas clearly and well
--uses varied sentence structure and appropriate vocabulary
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor flaws
4 A 4 paper presents a competent analysis of the issue and demonstrates adequate control of the elements of writing.
A typical paper in this category
--develops a position on the issue with relevant reasons and/or examples
--is adequately organized
--expresses ideas clearly
--demonstrates adequate control of language but may lack sentence variety
--demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some flaws作者: phelps 时间: 2004-7-27 10:48:37 标题: SCORING GUIDE FOR ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT
GRE ESSAY SCORING GUIDE: ANALYZE AN ARGUMENT SCORE
6 A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique of the argument and demonstrates mastery of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them insightfully
--develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions
--effectively supports the main points of the critique
--demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor flaws
5 A 5 paper presents a well-developed critique of the argument and demonstrates good control of the elements of effective writing.
A typical paper in this category
--clearly identifies important features of the argument and analyzes them in a generally thoughtful way
--develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions
--sensibly supports the main points of the critique
--demonstrates control of language, including diction and syntactic variety
--demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have occasional flaws
4 A 4 paper presents a competent critique of the argument and demonstrates adequate control of the elements of writing.
A typical paper in this category
--identifies and analyzes important features of the argument
--develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily but may not connect them with transitions
--supports the main points of the critique
--demonstrates sufficient control of language to convey ideas with reasonable clarity
--generally follows the conventions of standard written English but may have flaws