最初由 so猫 发布
[B]打击?
行了的, 我惯了~
这曾经是我最喜欢的一句台词
承受不了的东西 最后还是会惯了的
何况大家是为我好
谢谢楼上的各位 谢谢大家的意见
我的时间不多 还能不?.
以下省略...... [/B]
最初由 so猫 发布
[B]If one looks carefully in the history of science, he/she may find out that it is usually the beginners " 有个替换词"novices rather than the experts in the fields of inquiry that make important discoveries and break the old disciplines. I fundamentally agree with the speaker that the beginners tend to contribute important fundamental/vital/ discoveries more likely; however, the contribution of the beginner should not overrated and the function of experts in the process of inquiry should not be overlooked.
Why, people may wonder, do the beginners tend to make the discoveries more likely compared with the experts? As far as I am concerned, I find the reasons lie in the two ways in the way 很容易让人理解成 档到. --> aspects : the personal condition and the restriction from the outside. Firstly, as we know, the beginners are often more enthusiastic and ambitious to "leave something in the page of history", since they are nobody until they make important discoveries and even awake a revolution in the field. Thus they might stay night -->all night through to do experiments, work without relaxing for a week or more to analyze the authenticity of a result, and consume their private time and space to solve a problem. Meanwhile the experts, often aged, are necessary to sacrifice their health to do so; even if they are willing to dedicate themselves as the beginners do, they may have no such capability since the healthy condition and decease trouble. The more time spent in inquiry, usually the more discoveries could be found. Therefore it is quite reasonable for the beginners to make important discoveries more often.列举些例子比较好. 猫猫的文笔不错.^_^
In addition, and the more important 通常重要的应该在前面.个人认为删除这个为好. in my opinion, the beginners are disturbed less by the environment outside-- restraint, to be more exactly, from the public expectations and social view -->views. For supporting examples one needs to look no further than the academic field in which the names of the beginners are always not referred while the names of the top scientists are titled in black often. Take Einstein as an instance, as -->regarded asone of the most famous physicist in the 20th Century. At the early time when he tried to solve the problem of time and space, no one else concerned what he was doing and to what extent his research went on. He could think himself without reports and interviews; also he was not afraid to make mistakes in the process; moreover, he could bravely raise a question towards the doctrine without the fear of loss in respect and reputation. However, later when he became the founders of Relativity Theory, he once said that he could never either find a quiet and peaceful place to have a profound thinking or make decision based on his own will rather than that of public, since "so many people are expecting me to do something to change their life". In all, the restriction outside fettered the experts the same time bringing tremendous reputation to the experts; therefore, compared with the experts, the beginner have more space to do things actually important and more courage to do things they think right and then to make discoveries.
However, it cannot be implied from the analysis above that the contribution of the beginners is more important and the experts are of no use. As Newton has mentioned (and I paraphrase):" I can see farer than my ancestors in science, since I am standing on the shoulder of the giants in scientific history." Obviously this enunciates the guidance and foundation contributed from the experts. Experts usually function as the leader of the team that they could sharply point out the potential opportunity of development and hidden problems under a seemingly perfect mask. Without them the beginner who have not formed a whole vision of the field and have been puzzled when facing with numerous possibility. The instances supporting this point of view are simple for any greenhand researcher in lab to list, especially the ones who are facing troubles and turning for professors' suggestion. When utilized properly, the beginners could avoid many troubles and misleading due to the help from experts. Thus the function of experts in the process of making discoveries should not be neglected.
To sum up, it is true that beginner tend to make discoveries more often based on my analysis above; however, the function of experts should not be blamed to nothing but wasteful. Only when the functions of these two are combined altogether and properly, can the important discoveries be found more likely, and much faster and more easily.
[/B]
欢迎光临 寄托家园留学论坛 (https://bbs.gter.net/) | Powered by Discuz! X2 |