寄托家园留学论坛

标题: 【G盟心情篇】-V6专用讨论贴 ||考G如养猫-V6的战友看过来-We're back! [打印本页]

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-19 13:31:44 标题: 【G盟心情篇】-V6专用讨论贴 ||考G如养猫-V6的战友看过来-We're back!

不知大家有没有玩过文曲星里的电子宠物游戏，考完作文后玩了几天，重拾笔考不久觉得这两个东东还颇有相似之处呢。闲极无聊，发文一篇，看看大家有无同感呀。
考G如养猫：你注册了GRE考试之时也就是你填写了自己的猫咪领养卡之际，从此刻开始，自己才真正感受到考G的压力了，也觉得自己必须对自己的猫咪负责了。开始吧，看看怎么来养猫吧：
喂食：GRE单词正是这里的猫粮，几天不吃，猫就要饿死的，所以其它事可以不做，背单词是长期而艰巨的任务呀。个人认为杨鹏十七天是超级猫粮，而且是最不容易让你的猫饿死的方法。不过也要适量，因为过了一定的限度，猫也会不吃的。
鱼：在喂食里有个关键的东西，那就是鱼。因为只有吃了它，猫才会接受训练。个人认为GRE的解题方法就像是鱼，要想你的猫能接受训练，适量地给它灌点解题方法吧。不过猫一天只能训练一次，吃太多的鱼也是浪费。所以你每天的计划必须适量。最好目标明确一点吧，看准了一个方法，专攻一块吧。不要想一下子把所有的方法都掌握。Impossible.
训练：这是必不要少了，也就是做题了。不用多说了。
打扫：训练完了之后必须做的一项工作，也是对自己的训练的一个小结吧。看看哪些地方还有问题，可以查漏补缺的。
洗澡&&治病：这两点是用来帮你克服你的弱点的。对我来说GTER不仅仅是个大药房，而且还有着好多的docter，当你遇到问题时发个贴问一下吧，好心人多的是呢。千万不要讳疾忌医呀。
爱抚：这个是个心态了。虽然ETS很可恶，GRE是all-consuming job，你还是要每天对其爱抚一下的，违心的也行呀，这样起码自己会愿意去复习它吧。
购物：收集资料的过程。到网上去搜点东东吧，不要让你的猫饿着，它饥渴着呢。
玩耍：提高猫的morale必不可少的一步呀。所以每天不要把自己逼得太累了，适当的休闲娱乐还是必要的。自己这几天考完作文似乎学到了不少Cynicism,刻毂氐絙log里灌水，抓住一个靶子就批批批，GRE也没少被我批过，找个发泄的方式嘛。除此之外，我还打打小游戏，看看《joey》，稍微娱乐一下吧。
天使猫：坚持不懈的话你会养出一只天使猫的。而且这只天使猫似乎还能解救你的下一只猫呢。想想也是，一个好的GRE成绩似乎也能弥补掉你的其它的不足。
考G如养猫，希望各位为笔考奋斗的战友们都能把自己的猫养成天使猫。到时候不要只顾着用它来解救自己哟，记得到GTER上来为还在养猫的苦命人做点贡献吧。
不说了，睡觉去了，起来后还要继续喂猫呢。
;P

V6现在有三帖!
词汇:https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... &extra=page%3D1
阅读:https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... &extra=page%3D1
心情:https://bbs.gter.net/forum.php?mo ... &extra=page%3D1
V6的各位灌水就要心情帖,讨论进上两帖。G路漫漫，互动才能进步。

[ Last edited by xiaowenzi118 on 2005-9-11 at 18:48 ]

作者: 莫西 时间: 2005-8-19 14:11:56

呵呵，觉得写得很形象。仔细想想，还真有点相像。

作者: d_messiah 时间: 2005-8-19 14:23:54

不错

BTW 好久没玩电子宠物了

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-8-19 14:24:23

不错。我们站队的general新贴就跟在这后面得了！

作者: Gladysry 时间: 2005-8-19 15:28:02

呵呵，xiaowenzi 好形象地说~~看了之后心情陡然一爽~~

作者: ginachu 时间: 2005-8-19 16:29:42

呵呵,说得好形象
我想在就在喂超级猫粮呢:)

作者: Gladysry 时间: 2005-8-19 18:58:44

哈哈~~~，加精第一水~~hiahia~~~~以后就成我们的日用帖吧！;)

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-19 19:02:08

好啊！为我们队振一下士气，打一下头一炮！V6 back！笔考preparing中！:lol

自灌纯净水一桶！;P;P

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-8-19 19:32:20

这个就叫养猫站队吧！队长xiaowenzi118。;P

[ Last edited by zehua on 2005-8-19 at 19:35 ]

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-8-19 19:45:52

呵呵，有趣，顶一下

作者: 嘶喊的牧歌 时间: 2005-8-19 19:50:37

Originally posted by zehua at 2005-8-19 19:32
这个就叫养猫站队吧！队长xiaowenzi118。;P

站队？啥站队？呵呵。
大家都考完AW了啊。羡慕ing。
帮你们设一个高亮。大家一起互助吧。
别忘了带我一个。;P

BTW.可否请组长定一个rule？
:)

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-8-19 20:03:40

Originally posted by 嘶喊的牧歌 at 2005-8-19 19:50

站队？啥站队？呵呵。
大家都考完AW了啊。羡慕ing。
帮你们设一个高亮。大家一起互助吧。
别忘了带我一个。;P

BTW.可否请组长定一个rule？
:)

我们都是作文区V6站队的，现在转移到这里啦。:lol

作者: apple410 时间: 2005-8-19 20:05:58

楼主费心拉！
不过我觉得你真的很可爱呀！;)

作者: livecn 时间: 2005-8-19 20:53:31

养。。maomao 。。。。。。。。。

考。。g好难，，。。如果真可以养maomao 就好了。。。

作者: livecn 时间: 2005-8-19 20:55:01

小土，８。３０考。aw.。。。。。。掉队了。

作者: Gladysry 时间: 2005-8-19 21:05:13

厚厚，斑斑和苹果mm也来助阵了，偶们可以开开心心的转移开始啰！

作者: forevera 时间: 2005-8-19 21:36:31

BLESS

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-19 22:33:03 标题: 哈哈，我们V组的势力扩大到笔考版了！

队长不敢当呀，还是首推zehua，你可是V6的创立者呀！
我嘛，永远的cheerleader;P，也只能干这个了。;P
不过确实想定一个规则。要是有外来人员想加入的话，必须为本组在作文版奋斗的战友们义务改文章三篇（不过份吧，大家考过awa的，应该是小case了），经现任队长mkb同意后即可加入了，呵呵！;P

还是喜欢原来的名字，V组victory，V组充满Vigor，V组Verbal 800，呵呵！;P 还是比较喜欢干Cheerleader的事呀！

作者: Gladysry 时间: 2005-8-19 22:44:11

厚厚，支持xiaowenzi mm 做cheerleader！！！偶也加入呵呵~~~跟你当个副手吧！

作者: 嘶喊的牧歌 时间: 2005-8-19 22:56:24

组长快点订计划吧。

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-19 23:09:27 标题: 版主不用心急

版主不用这么急，我们的人大都才考完awa呢，现在处于休养生息阶段。
玩够了，大家都回来了，再共商大计。
集体的智慧！;P

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-19 23:41:15 标题: 刚刚逛了一下同学的blog，发现转载的一条鱼还不错。

第一条鱼：不知GTER上有没有。不过应该不是今年的6G吧。大家慢慢享用吧。;P

6G成绩终于出来了，很满意的分数。回想想准备的痛苦也算是值得了。昨天兴奋了一个晚上，想想还是写点东西，主要是自己准备的过程和当时的状态，希望对GTer们有帮助。我是先T后G的，感觉T对G还是有一定的帮助的，尤其是词汇，张红岩的一本背下来,词汇少了3000个，虽然里面很多不是GRE词汇，但是很常用，对于没有背过4，6级词汇的人考G还是很不错的。

词汇的准备——我是从11月中旬开始准备G，前一个半月什么也没干，就背单词了。50天把99红宝背了一遍。速度慢的可以-_-!!!不过偶背单词一向都很弱，所以能坚持下来就很高兴了。也没有找到什么窍门。网上流行17天搞定单词，我是没那么干，会死人的。第一遍单词背完就放寒假了，寒假里面开始第2遍，同时开始做阅读真题。一个寒假第2遍单词看了30个list，阅读做完了No.4-9的真题（阅读下面再说）。第2遍是最痛苦的时候，因为发现第一遍的记忆率那叫低啊，估计是第一遍时间拖的太长的缘故，除了前10个li st记得多些，后面生词的认识率基本上都<20%，不过加上托福的词汇底子，大概达到30％，这一遍我是背完一个list就做一些词汇练习的，不过没有碰真题，主要用的是一本词汇习题。书的名字是《GRE词汇总练习》（偶不是推销书的呀），错的很多，当时心情暴郁闷，呵呵。个人感觉单词还是要背练结合的，光背太容易忘了，尤其是像我这样坐不住的人，背一个list,要倒n杯水，逛n个宿舍的，练习对于加深印象作用很大。开学以后继续把第2遍剩下的21个list背了，基本上已经到了2月中旬了。这遍背玩以后，大概能到50％。然后我丢掉了红宝，开始背黑宝，同时也开始做No真题了。黑宝确实短小精悍，而且由于背过红宝了，黑宝看起来还是很快的，15天搞定了一遍。记忆率大概有75％。建议大家都试试黑宝，因为他的排版方式啊，词义解释啊都很不错，很容易让人记住单词。唯一的不足就是词可能少了点，不适应笔考的bt要求。在背第一遍黑宝的同时，开始看barron，是看不是背。觉得重要的又不会的单词就记一下。巴朗是个好东西，例句经典，因为没有强硬的背诵计划，所以看起来也不是很累。里面有不少反华的句子哦^^。因为作文也要开是看了，所以后面就没有很系统的背单词了。考完作文（3月10号）以后，又把红宝看了一遍，1天5个list，不过这一遍似乎作用不大，记住的早就记住了，不认识的还是不认识，一遍下来大概提高了5个百分点。从此告别红宝，再也没翻过了。专心黑宝和真题。同时继续看 barron。所有类反真题我做了3遍，每一遍都有提高。不要怕记住答案，没关系的。和toefl一样，最后看到题干就能知道要考什么也是一种很牛的状态哦^_^。在做类比的时候，没上过新东方，也没有看过专门的类比的书，所以不是很清楚那些类比类型的术语。其实不懂也没关系，凭着偶们朴素的类比观，还是可以摸索出来的。我的方法是用固定的句式去套，比如：
AERATE;OXYGEN
A) eclipse;light
B)desiccate; moisture
C)precipitate: additive
D)hydrate:water
E) striate:texture
我是这样分析的： aerate means to provide sth with oxygen( or air)
hydrate means to provide sth with water.

这道题比较简单，但是大家可以试试看这种方法，很不错的，因为上下两个句型完全一致

，而且这样一些干扰选项放到句子里面就很容易排除了。
再看一条： MALLEABLE:SHAPE = irresolute: opinion
同样,mallealbe means that sth's shape is easy to change.
irresolute means sb's opinion is easy to change.
很简单，但是很实用的方法，比找逻辑，然后去套固定的关系要简单快速。
反义的话比较麻烦，完全靠实力了，不过对于是一些细微的区别。也可以放到句子里面去判断，这个就要靠平时的积累了。语感很重要的。另外，建议大家在背单词的时候不要图快，适当的拆拆词根词缀，这样虽然开始很痛苦，但是后面要轻松许多，而且总会遇到不认识的词，用词根分析命中率会高那么一点点。

阅读准备——阅读用了思马得得一本的阅读书，黄颜色封面。然后就是做真题，我所有真
题的阅读还做了3遍。第一遍是寒假里和开学初做的，不限定时间。因为考过托福，同时以
前也看过“reader's choice"，所以速度还可以，除了少数bt的No文化类阅读，第一遍时
间一长一短基本上在17分钟，到国内题就更快一些，15分钟就能看完了。那本书的用处就
是做完题，对答案，然后看看错的题，因为书上会把每道题的答题依据表明出来，这样看
起来就很方便了。肯定有看不懂的文章的，对于那些我看了中文翻译还是不懂的文章我是
放弃的，不会死钻牛角尖，毕竟要有所取舍，再说了，不会霉到底，考试都是这样的文章
呀。阅读的词汇，GRE的阅读最好的一点就是不考词汇题，也就是说单词不认识没关系
上下文猜啊，即使猜不出来也有很多情况下不影响理解和答题的。
至于阅读速度的提高，我建议可以用下面的方法：反正GRE可以划，那就多用点标记。1）
所有的重要连接词都用圈划出来，像however, notwithstanding之类的。这样文章的转折
过度就很清楚了。
2）往往文章会涉及到很多人名，书名，地名等等，相信大家都碰到过，答题的时候出来一
个人名，回去都找不到在文章哪里了，我是都用a,b,c,d,e标上，这样做细节题很容易定位。如果文章还有其他类似的东西，就再用一套系统，I，II，III什么的，卷子越花越好，呵呵
3）然后文章里面有很明显的give point的语句，那就用线画出来，尤其是那种文章分好了几点的，也相应用1,2,3标出来。这样的文章很多，这种方法把握文章意思非常准和快。

关于真题，首先个人感觉No题要比国内题要难，语言要晦涩，而且我们缺乏相应的背景知
识，考个作家的事我们很可能听都没听过这个人。所以错的自然也多以些。国内题就简单
一些，没有这种晦涩的东西。这对理科学生还是有利的，科技类文章难度差不多的情况下
，文学经济类的简单了，阅读分数自然也就上去了。而且现在阅读的趋势是变得简单了
这次6G的阅读真的很简单，月球形成的那篇文章以前出现过类似的。其实做完真题就会发
现GRE也会重复考阅读的内容的。黑人社区的那篇文章也很简单，甚至比去年10T的那篇城市艺术的还简单。

填空的准备——照样，3遍真题。第一遍开学初，用的陈的填空。建议大家不要看他的那
些复杂的术语，什么粘练啊之类的，纯粹唬人的。把简单的问题复杂化以显得自己多么有
水平，应该强烈b4他。只要看他的翻译，以及一些技巧就行了。填空主要是分句之间逻辑
关系的把握。抓住关联词，however, but ,and之类的，还有抓住句子中对应的成分。还有
就是要注意一些词语的隐含的意思，有很多词语不上中性的，例如一些带有否定的词yet之类的，那么做题的时候就要再拐一个弯。具体的方法很多了。看看参考书就行了。有余力的把pp2上面的填空都做做，还有一本额外的填空习题。钱坤强出的，不错，和真题很像。
这次6G填空难度还可以，介于阅读和词汇之间。看懂句子的意思，做起来还是很爽的。我
想我分数之所以不错就是因为填空和阅读做得比较好，毕竟词汇准备的太差，不够充分。

作者: 禾慕繁星 时间: 2005-8-20 00:26:08

难得有这样的心态……以前大家都是一副苦大仇深的样子，如果都像楼主这样看待ｇｒｅ，就好了，呵呵……

作者: 嘶喊的牧歌 时间: 2005-8-20 00:32:46

Originally posted by xiaowenzi118 at 2005-8-19 23:09
我们的人

。。。。。。。。。
老大派头出来了。。。

呵呵。
我是想等一考完AW就加入大部队嘛。
那大家好好休息下。
顺便为我加油啊。
;)

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-8-20 09:24:23

Originally posted by 嘶喊的牧歌 at 2005-8-20 00:32

。。。。。。。。。
老大派头出来了。。。

呵呵。
我是想等一考完AW就加入大部队嘛。
那大家好好休息下。
顺便为我加油啊。
;)

现在不是还在评选优秀作文互改站队嘛？你不选我们就不让你加;P

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-20 12:53:29 标题: 发现可以改签名档了！

今天把签名档改了。不知大家还记不记得那个故事，讲天堂和地狱的。地狱中的人只顾着自己，而天堂中的人相互喂食。

现在V6又可以展开新的一轮互助养猫了。;P 哈哈。Teamwork！马上就可以重入Paradise而不是inferno 了！:victory:

作者: Gladysry 时间: 2005-8-20 17:46:55

貌似大家还没有转移过来饿！到作文铁再去拉拉人.:)

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-20 23:08:22 标题: 不要给没考完的人太多压力了！

不要再去发什么水帖了，让他们安心复习吧！;P
这两天在作文帖里谈这个事已经觉得很不好意思了。
先好好背几天单词，等人齐了再共商大计吧。:victory:

作者: Gladysry 时间: 2005-8-21 00:23:03

偶错了~~~

ms偶没有在日用帖里灌水啊…………55555~~~

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-21 00:26:51

知道了！

作者: dr_green 时间: 2005-8-21 09:50:47

报到～～原来是转到这里了呀～～～

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-21 12:19:24 标题: 最近要小爽几天了，可能要消失一段时间了

马上要开学了，最近家里事又多，一会有人搬家，一会弟弟们毕业了又要请客。又要展开毕业后的新一轮大吃大喝了。正好可以来充充GRE的晦气，要消失一段时间了。;P

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-8-21 19:42:13

Originally posted by xiaowenzi118 at 2005-8-21 12:19
马上要开学了，最近家里事又多，一会有人搬家，一会弟弟们毕业了又要请客。又要展开毕业后的新一轮大吃大喝了。正好可以来充充GRE的晦气，要消失一段时间了。;P

怎么毕业生这会儿才走啊？
我最近也有些杂事。驾照要年审等，最近都在折腾哪！不过也快了，明天估计就搞定了。后天开始复习红宝书。
急问：颠峰词汇哪里买？
顺便水一下：这里头像超多
http://uushop.net/bbs2/htm_data/6/0506/68731.html

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-8-24 14:34:05

今天开始复习词汇啦！争取2－3天搞定！

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-8-27 21:08:36

淹死了，提一下

作者: fishwater00 时间: 2005-8-28 09:23:28

多谢

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-28 10:41:23

回来了！又可以来灌了！

作者: iwaa 时间: 2005-8-28 12:22:36

我也来up

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-29 00:25:05 标题: 不是吧，照这种趋势，这个贴将变成水帖了！

看来得好好检讨一下了。今天心情不错，终于结束了我的杨鹏十七天，最后几天简直要死人了。不知大家复习得如何了。还在休养生息？？？

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-8-29 10:14:13

admiring, my vocabulary!!!!

作者: 翦瞳 时间: 2005-8-29 11:03:02

呵呵，队长换了，不过队员的积极性可一点都没有变，我迟到了，加我一个吧！

作者: fxs_007 时间: 2005-8-29 12:02:01

哈哈
楼主好有意思啊

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-29 13:17:52 标题: 没换！

Originally posted by 翦瞳 at 2005-8-29 11:03
呵呵，队长换了，不过队员的积极性可一点都没有变，我迟到了，加我一个吧！

队长还是zehua呢，创使人呀！;P;P

作者: mamak6322 时间: 2005-8-29 14:23:00

赫赫~~ 有趣很形象~~ 我以前用文曲星养过，不过给养死了哎……

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-8-29 19:53:22

这两天被作文折磨得不行了，真想赶紧得到解脱，现在眼睛很累，不太舒服
更糟糕的是现在小队里在这一边儿基本上没人了，没有砖头，也就没有了动力，一个人极其郁闷
真想早日过去和大家会合，到时候再把自己做必考的体会一一道来，毕竟那些题我大概都作了两遍半了
至于阅读我想交流的最好方法就是找一篇文章然后从头到尾的读下来，把个人读到每一句话所想到的东西都写在旁边，这样就会有感觉，什么样的词或者是结构有什么样的暗示作用了－－时间长了不用标注可以地用逻辑去想，直接就会在头脑中对文章的内容又一个轮廓，这一点非常重要，可以使我们大约只读三分之一至多一半的字数就能做对七分之六的题目，剩下一道一般是要仔细一点
可惜现在没时间，到时候考完稍微恢复一下笔考的感觉就来做这个工作

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-29 22:58:54

mkb真是个牛人+好人呀！赞一个！

作者: dr_green 时间: 2005-8-31 10:41:34 标题: 汗。。。我的词汇。。。

昨天才开始17天不过只做红宝的一半大概20个lists 好难啊~~ 每次看三个新list我都花四五个小时阿。。。在加上晚上复习。。。开学怎么办的说。。

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-8-31 23:23:28 标题: 今天本本真不争气

似乎变压器有点接触不良，好不容易通了一下。真ft！
我已经做好开学逃课的准备了，一些背背的课和没有期中考试的课以及easy型的都可以逃的。

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-1 17:47:47

Originally posted by xiaowenzi118 at 2005-8-31 23:23
似乎变压器有点接触不良，好不容易通了一下。真ft！
我已经做好开学逃课的准备了，一些背背的课和没有期中考试的课以及easy型的都可以逃的。

你不是已经大四毕业了嘛？还有啥子课？:O

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-1 17:48:52

Originally posted by xiaowenzi118 at 2005-8-29 13:17

队长还是zehua呢，创使人呀！;P;P

无所谓啊。轮流坐庄也挺好玩呀;P

作者: Dendis 时间: 2005-9-1 19:57:45

看来考g的确还能培养大家的发散性思维啊，^_^

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-1 22:45:47

Originally posted by zehua at 2005-9-1 17:47

你不是已经大四毕业了嘛？还有啥子课？:O

是呀。这学期就研一了。前几天早已经去实验室和师兄师姐商量逃课大计了呢。还好这学期的课都没的什么期中考试的，无所谓了，自己也颇喜欢考前突击的。
不过今天文章回来了，居然中了，又要补实验去了。:L 这个时候还真是郁闷。看来不逃课也不行了呢。

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-2 19:13:50

Originally posted by hustzwj at 2005-9-2 18:42
没想到你们在这里？这里开始不是在养猫吗？
:lol

多谢zehua发短消息告诉我，要不真还以为散了呢！

我也加入，虽然有点迟了！

欢迎欢迎，这几天自己时间比较零散，刚搬了家，过几天还要去做实验。相信大家也一样吧。刚开学是会忙一点的。这里就作为一个大家交流的平台吧，也不要搞什么统一计划了，毕竟大家的安排都不一样，时间分配也差异较大。大家交流一下感想，讨论一下问题，难题什么的吧。

作者: fanfanzozo 时间: 2005-9-2 20:08:51 标题: 报到啦

考完作文就去旅行了，刚把单词看完，那位告诉一下，新东方发的最新笔试那个黄本是什么时候的题啊，还有ets官方出的那本对了一下和90－94的那个白本很不一样啊

作者: wineyre 时间: 2005-9-2 20:32:43

刚考完AW,来报到~~原V6队员~~

晕~~楼上的,两重对应好像没见过这样对的~~不过可能我孤陋寡闻~~

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-2 20:44:26

Originally posted by xiaowenzi118 at 2005-9-2 17:41
哎,只有读完研再出去了。希望这篇改后能成功吧，这样就能提前毕业了。想想自己考完GT和Sub也要一年，提前毕业的话就多一年，忍了。:L哎，没办法，现在后悔也没用了。所以要吸取教训，加油:victory:，看你的行程排 ...

我是大三啊。课程当然重要。可是SUB有20天搞应该够了。T的话我高二就考过，627。这次花1周也该够了吧。
你不要光说答案啊，说下WHY啊。我都说了，格式是按题目，我选错的，正确的排列。当然正确的都是最下面的啊。关键是WHY。:L

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-2 21:17:28

No.6第一套section1 我前面都是对的，可是34－38全错。强烈怀疑是答案印错了！谁帮忙查下？

作者: iceoolong 时间: 2005-9-3 10:38:19

V6成员报道，呵呵，AW还没有考完
先占座

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 13:24:45

看了一下zuhua的帖子很想现在回复，不过实在是没时间，九号晚上就回来补上
好不容易得到两天day-off今天下午开始看第三遍a提纲---暂时打算把零频先放过，待到最后再看一下，不知道明天上午能不能看完，担心ing
明天开始会最后发一些模考的文章，希望大家到时候也去捧场，先谢过了

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 13:27:26

Originally posted by fanfanzozo at 2005-9-2 20:30
蛇和鸭都是地上的，鹰是天上的

这个。。。没有这样的二重对应，xiaowenzi说的对,就是行动方式的对应，鹰的话应该是fly/soar这样比较一般的词来描述，circle--盘旋，太具体了

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 13:28:49

还是手痒，先回这一个，其他的考完再说

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-3 13:29:12

Originally posted by mkb57288 at 2005-9-3 13:24
看了一下zuhua的帖子很想现在回复，不过实在是没时间，九号晚上就回来补上
好不容易得到两天day-off今天下午开始看第三遍a提纲---暂时打算把零频先放过，待到最后再看一下，不知道明天上午能不能看完，担心ing
...

都给mkb57288捧场啊！哪怕只改1－2篇也好啊！:handshake

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 16:02:47

不知道大家认为argument有没有一些高频的参考价值
看了更新到2/9机井，发现零频还是有70道
现在在主攻总频率在5以上的题目--116道
以前看过一遍全部的题库，不知道现在要是不看剩下的一半题目会不会风险很大

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-3 16:24:03

Originally posted by mkb57288 at 2005-9-3 16:02
不知道大家认为argument有没有一些高频的参考价值
看了更新到2/9机井，发现零频还是有70道
现在在主攻总频率在5以上的题目--116道
以前看过一遍全部的题库，不知道现在要是不看剩下的一半题目会不会风险很大

不会吧。我觉得不可能2道都是0频。:lol
我当初也是只看5以上的

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 16:29:32

Originally posted by zehua at 2005-9-3 16:24

不可能2道都是0频

我是说Argument，不过觉得还凑合，好像九月报上来的37道里，只有一道出了这个范围

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 16:36:26 标题: To Zehua

看了一下，issue的话要是只看5以上的也只有108道（也不比我这95到的高频多多少哦;P;P），才发现你考的31是8月的超高频啊，当时我根据八月初的资料还以为频率很低的说，看样子高频的资料要经常的update才保险，汗。。。:L:L

作者: dr_green 时间: 2005-9-3 18:05:16

我觉得高频可以先看7 8月出现多的
有好多高频题都是前几个月出现特别多 7 8 月都没有几次

argument其实不一定都看完吧只要挑错的方法练熟了就算到时候真的碰上没看过的也写得出来

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-3 18:21:07 标题: To zehua

你不用宋昊那本书吗? 我比较喜欢看上面的答案。
虽然很想回，最近实在是没时间了。:L

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 18:32:40

宋昊那本书真的是不错的，虽然后面的关系解释有一些过于简单化，但是前面的题目翻译也不错哦

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 19:37:10

又看了十个依然有两个说不清楚，严重汗。。。
但愿复习了单词之后会好一点，现在没感觉

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 19:47:15

只是翻了一下，想到什么说什么--说得不仔细，也没有查字典，那些没有解释出来的，考完作文之后再说了

作者: mophance 时间: 2005-9-3 20:24:20

我QQ最近领养了个宠物，挺好玩的

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 20:32:40

你这是什么答案？？？

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 20:34:48

这个好像是有问题
最好连题目一起发，不然可能把正确答案给漏掉了

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 20:50:38

我是来不及，等考完一起说，我那些连字典都没查，也不知道说的对错
但你这个书的答案好象有些问题

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 21:00:55

终于看完了高频Argument的一半，继续努力争取今天晚上看完，明天中午之前模考两篇I 一篇A

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-3 23:28:35

zehua你今天做了几个section呀？感觉好多呀。我昨天什么也没做，今天补了一下，做了no7-8的类反，反义错得多了，觉得比前面的多一点。

不知一般类反错几个算是可以保底呢？？我要求不高，Verbal 550就行。

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-3 23:38:06

Originally posted by mkb57288 at 2005-9-3 21:00
终于看完了高频Argument的一半，继续努力争取今天晚上看完，明天中午之前模考两篇I 一篇A

真是个好人呀，快考了，加油。我争取明后两天把样品做了，然后就可以去帮你小拍一下了。相信水平应该非同一般了吧。;P

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-3 23:41:33

不要这么说倒时候会失望的

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-4 07:39:44

刚才收到斑竹的pm了，要对V6站队表扬，还有给队友加分！！！

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-4 09:55:03

Originally posted by zehua at 2005-9-4 07:39
刚才收到斑竹的pm了，要对V6站队表扬，还有给队友加分！！！

不错不错,今天要做一天实验了。刚刚用王水泡了一大堆东西，好不容易可以歇一下。
晚上可以上来讨论一下。:lol

[ Last edited by xiaowenzi118 on 2005-9-4 at 10:02 ]

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 10:45:13

有没有搞错，刚才竟然有人打电话追到香港来说要我参加什么保持共产党员先进性教育，还要寄学习材料回去，严重汗。。。我现在觉得能把作文考完就是先进性的最好表现了

下面附上一篇刚刚写完的argument，自我感觉还可以，但很不幸的超时了两分钟，正在考虑原来的速度到哪里去了，anyway期待大家的砖头

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 10:46:21

------题目------
The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
'Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment.'
------正文------
Before accepting the prescribed antibiotic for all patients suffering from muscle strain, it is necessary to examine the reliability carefully. In my observation, the well-organized by poorly-reasoned argument suffers from several logic fallacies: first, the study, upon which author's conclusion established, is absent of details, then probably dubious; secondly, many other factors influencing the healing of muscle strain are overlooked; finally, the author seems to generalize imprudently. Now, I will analyze these one by one.

To begin with, to be reliable evidence, mentioned study must be strictly controlled. In other words, the anticipating patients must be identical in all related aspects. The author, however, fails to do so. It is highly possible that people in the first group are much stronger than those in the second group, and their healthy physique helps to reduce the time for convalescence. It is equally possible that patients in the first group are much younger than their counterparts in the control group, which may also accelerate the process of healing. The author even fails to consider influence imposed on the study result by different sexes, for it is highly possible that male can enjoy a quicker healing than female. Furthermore no evidence is provided about the number of samples in each group. If the number is too small, then the conclusion's representativeness of the overall pool will surely be weakened. As a result, the author cannot claim it is suitable for every patient with muscle strain to take antibiotics.

Another problem with the argument is that the author overlooks other factors that may influence the result of study. Even from the description of author's, we can notice one conspicuously different factor--that is different physicians. It is might the case that doctor specializing in sports medicine helps in reducing the time spent on convalescence, for he or she is much more capable than the general physician in treating muscle strain, which is a manifestation of sport injury. Or perhaps, patients in the first group receive more intensive care from nurses or some extra treatment, say kneading on the strained muscle. In short, before ruling out other possible factors that influence the time spent on healing, the author fails to convince me it is antibiotic rather than other factors that accelerate the process of convalescence.

Last but not least, even if secondary infections keep some patients from healing quick after 'severe' muscle strain, what about the patients with ordinary or minor muscle strain? No evidence shows that there is a good chance for these patients to get secondary infection. Therefore, antibiotics may be not necessary at all. Moreover, as we know, antibiotics is often of some side-effect, and not suitable for every. That is to say, following the generalization of the author, we actually take potential risk of undermining the health of patients.

To sum up, the mentioned fallacies severely weaken the reliability of the argument. To better support his or her conclusion, the author must substantiate that the study is strictly controlled and all factors that may influence the result are precluded. Meanwhile, to get a sounder conclusion, the author also tries hard to avoid any imprudent generalization as he does at the end of the argument.

[ Last edited by mkb57288 on 2005-9-4 at 13:45 ]

作者: nickaaronlee 时间: 2005-9-4 11:03:45

这几天没有把电脑带到学校，呵呵，V6还是好热闹哦~~~

作者: nickaaronlee 时间: 2005-9-4 11:06:46

觉得verbal好麻烦阿

作者: killer007001 时间: 2005-9-4 11:10:09

不错不错
猫不错

作者: nickaaronlee 时间: 2005-9-4 11:30:31

大家现在单词都背到什么程度了？

作者: esmeiras 时间: 2005-9-4 12:11:04 标题: 变色工具山了,将就看看哈

------正文

Before accepting the prescribed antibiotic for all patients suffering from muscle strain, it is necessary to examine the reliability carefully. （和范文的结构是一样的，这里开头是肯定可行的。但我想指出的是这句还是不够强烈；既然是药，必须通过检测和临床实验那些 it is necessary 语气会不会弱了一点呢？）  In my observation, （我觉得这里改一点点承接会更加连贯。参考一下ets范文那个红茶的，我的扔老远了，至少加个however这样的提示词也要好点啊） the well-organized by poorly-reasoned argument suffers from several logic fallacies: first, the study, upon which author's conclusion established, is undetailed, （查无此词）then probably dubious; second,  many other factors influencing the healing of muscle strain are overlooked; finally, the author seems to generalize imprudently. （ Now, I will analyze these one by one 说实话，感觉挺刹风景的）

to begin with, to be reliable evidence, mentioned study must be strictly controlled. （第一句最好不要用散句。英文，尤其是正式文体第一句一般都是一句很长的复合句啊。）In other words, the anticipating patients must be identical in all related aspects. The author, however, fails to do so （ that 会不会好一点？ So, 这种介词放在句尾没有that 正式，虽然很多人都这么用） . It is highly possible that people in （ the） first group are much stronger than those in  (the 定冠词呀大大}second group, and their healthy physique helps to reduce the time for convalescence. Or perhaps, （ beside, it is equally possible that the） patients in the first group are much younger than their counterparts in the control group, which may also accelerate the process of healing. （定丛太多了点）The author even fails to consider influence imposed on the study result by different sexes, for it is highly possible that male can enjoy a quicker healing than female. Furthermore （，） no evidence is provided about the ( number  of samples 怪怪的，把人成做sample…  no evidence…..about the quantity of the …..participated in the….. 我好久没写了，你随便参考一下哈)  in each group. If the number is too small, then the conclusion's representative ness  of the overall pool will surely be weakened. As a result, the author cannot claim it is suitable for every patient with muscle strain to take antibiotics.

Another problem with the argument is that the author overlooks other factors that may influence the result of study.  （恩恩，他因）Even from the description of author's, we can notice one conspicuously different factor--that is  （different ） doctors （这么是8对滴， the differentials of doctors?  好象也不对。干脆就说different doctors might …different prescriptions嘛。。~~ .会不会明白点呢。。。~) It is highly possible that doctor specializing in sports medicine helps in reducing the time spent on convalescence, for he or she is much more capable than the general physician in treating muscle strain, which is a manifestation of sport injury. （定丛又来了。。~） Or perhaps,（老大，又来了。。~） patients in the first group receive more intensive care from nurses or some extra treatment, say kneading on the strained muscle. In short, before ruling out other possible factors that influence the time spent on healing, the author fails to convince me it is antibiotic rather than other factors that accelerate the process of convalescence.

Last but not least, even if secondary infections keep some patients from healing quick after 'severe' muscle strain, what about the patients with ordinary or minor muscle strain? No evidence shows that there is a good chance for these patients to get secondary infection. Therefore, antibiotics may be not necessary at all. Moreover, as we know, antibiotics （ is often of  ， is often consisted with…could always bring..）some side-effect, and not suitable for every( every 什么？  Everyone 不？) That is to say, following the generalization of the author, we actually take potential risk of undermining the health of patients.  （最后一句很好！）

To sum up, the mentioned fallacies severely weaken the reliability of the argument. To better support his or her （那有这么麻烦啊，非要强调作者的性别吗？ To better support‘the’argument 也可以嘛）conclusion, the author must substantiate that the study is strictly controlled and all factors that may influence the result are precluded. Meanwhile, to get a sounder conclusion, the author also tries hard to avoid any imprudent generalization as he does at the end of the argument.

Comments:
1. 大大，这个开头如果是4分应该是绝对没问题的，如果考官心情好点排到5分可能也行。但我对你的期望是6分哦。我是你我开头就用范文一样的2句，一句长一句短，把问题说清楚又简洁有力。这里的1，2，3 还有承接我感觉写的不是最理想的说。你就是丢了这几句也有差不多500字啊

2. 拍的比较狠，别影响心情哦，你的结构啊都很好的，尤其是issue, 那个葱白。。。~~~嘿嘿
3. 这么写已经可以了，别担心，我是用理想主义的目光来看的，呵呵。不过还是建议看下红茶的那篇范文啊。加油哦！！！！！  等好消息！！！！！

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 12:28:19

这个也是一篇6分范文的标准开头:L

A recent survey of dental patients showed that people who use Smile-Bright toothpaste are most likely to have capped teeth -- artificial but natural-looking protective coverings placed by dentists on individual teeth.  Those people who had begun using Smile-Bright toothpaste early in life were more likely to have capped teeth than were people who had begun using Smile-Bright later in life.  In addition, those who reported brushing their teeth more than twice a day with Smile-Bright toothpaste were more likely to have caps on their teeth than were those who reported brushing with Smile-Bright less frequently.  Therefore, people wishing to avoid having their teeth capped should not use Smile-Bright toothpaste.

Sample-1 (Score 6)
The argument contains several facets that are questionable.  First, the reliability and generalizability  of the survey are open to quesiton.  In addition, the argument assumes a correlation amounts to a causal relationship.  The argument also fails to examine alternative explanations.  I will discuss each of these facets in turn.

关于句子的问题，谢谢你指出的一些句式单调的问题，只是当时没有好好考虑，现在正在总结修改，另外，关于你说的长句比较正式---我现在是在刻意得避免长句子，有些时候觉得长句对于阿狗不是很有力量的回应，或者我比较乐意在一段的首句使用短句，就是有280那样的长句也放到后面的第二句上去，总觉得像那样一段内只有一点具体的反驳，前后都是逻辑的长句子分析也不是很有说服力的

还有，那个葱白是什么意思？？？

[ Last edited by mkb57288 on 2005-9-4 at 13:37 ]

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 12:49:58

上午宿舍的roomate来了，交流了一下没有完成任务，下午继续

作者: esmeiras 时间: 2005-9-4 13:21:21

Originally posted by mkb57288 at 2005-9-4 12:28
这个也是一篇6分范文的标准开头:L

A recent survey of dental patients showed that people who use Smile-Bright toothpaste are most likely to have capped teeth -- artificial but natural-looking prote ...

我说的1,2,3 关键是语言给人的说服力不太强; first,second...这些信号词没有问题的. 那个6分的开头语言简洁明了, 除了信号词还有 wording,对我门来说一下很难作到.

关于长句,没有绝对的对错,关键在于写得好不好,恰当与否. 海明威也喜欢用一串短句,但人家用的妙啊.  我的意思主要是说你那2个地方用长句应该比短句会好一点.

那个"葱白",大大不能联想一下哈,非要人家点明是" 崇拜"啊.....~~~~~:O

;P

已经写的很好的啦! :D  :victory:

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 15:08:20 标题: 恐怕又要有人说这一篇像argument了--anyway大家拍

今天限时一个劲儿的失败，又超了三分多
------题目------
Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Otherwise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
------正文------
Although a society cannot develop quickly without certain experts or talents, I strongly disagree on the assertion that children have special talents should be identified and trained to ensure they can excel in given fields. Because by doing so, we actually strive to shape a society admiring elitism at the expense of equality.

In the ever-developing ear, it seems tempting to agree with the speaker that we should cultivate talented children to help our society develop more quickly. After all, these children are so distinguished in given fields that they can accomplish the same achievement with considerable less effort than ordinary ones. In this case, it will be definitely redeemable loss that leaving such talents unexploited. However, I cast doubt on the speaker's assertion that training them at an early age will bring about a better world, by which I mean more equal, more balanced and more harmonious.

One threshold problem with the assertion is that we cannot choose fair criteria to determine which talents and abilities are more worthy cultivating. For better or not, in the society lionizing pragmatism, it is highly possible that talents associated with economic success get preferred. For instance, a children talented in mathematics or physics is usually be given extraordinary attention and training, because his talents are likely to bring about certain direct breakthrough in information technology that can create a mint of money as a result. On the other hand, children talented in folklore study tends to flag into oblivion, for their success seems to be obsolete and can hardly result in any economic success. In fact, by streaming children to two groups separately labeled talented and ordinary, we seem to be encouraging certain elitism. In my observation, the stream can not justify itself by allocating educational resources unequally even at the very beginning of one's life. However, all the children are equal citizens in the future; therefore they should not be excluded from some privileges intended to a handful of people, which will deprive them of the opportunity for self-development.

Furthermore, it seems presumptuous for the speaker to assert that the well-trained children can eventually excel in their areas and benefit our society as a result. In my observation, such training designed for so-called talented is usually featured by intensive inculcation of knowledge, which, too often, take up so much time that prevent the children from enjoying their childhood. Due to such psychological defect, these children are likely to take study as a boring and unfruitful process that brings about little happiness. After all, individuals, who are absent of interest, can hardly work effectively in given fields. Moreover, it is also possible that our educators underscore intellect and so-called talent nurture at the expense of skill in socialization, a valuable characteristic demanded by modern society. Without proper communication and coordination with others, any individual, no matter how talented he is, can never contribute significantly to our society.

In the concern whether the ethic maturity can keep pace with that of intellect, lies another reason why I take exception to the speaker's claim. If the well-trained children can only excel in given technical field while show little maturity in ethics, our society is likely to suffer from the effort of nurturing such talents. Consider the increasingly rampant criminals over Internet. Many of those attribute to some teenagers, who excel at information technology but lack certain maturity or wisdom to discern right from wrong. In this case, nurturing such talents before ethic mature accomplishes little to the well-being of our society and even serves as a backfire.

In final analysis, before fully accepting the author's assertion, we are obliged to make sure that the children are ethically qualified for the training. Moreover, we should also avoid elitism to prevent our society devolving into an unequal one.

[ Last edited by mkb57288 on 2005-9-4 at 18:38 ]

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 15:31:38

上面贴上来的是修改后的版本，把一处蹩脚的句子和typo改掉了，看样子考试真的是得留出时间来检查，可是现在限时还不成功，严重汗。。。

[ Last edited by mkb57288 on 2005-9-4 at 15:35 ]

作者: zehua 时间: 2005-9-4 20:05:35

Originally posted by xiaowenzi118 at 2005-9-4 09:55

不错不错,今天要做一天实验了。刚刚用王水泡了一大堆东西，好不容易可以歇一下。
晚上可以上来讨论一下。:lol

泡了些啥？泡脚没？;P

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 20:20:43

Originally posted by zehua at 2005-9-4 20:05

泡了些啥？泡脚没？;P

这个玩笑开的有一点儿过分了:L

作者: wineyre 时间: 2005-9-4 21:32:48

水贴，想问zehua是学什么的啊？

作者: xiaowenzi118 时间: 2005-9-4 21:44:08

GOD！看来以后：　　P要这样打了

作者: mkb57288 时间: 2005-9-4 23:07:34

暗喻是literal 的一种---这个观点极端不同意，literal，就是字面直白的意思，是不会有metaphor的

作者: esmeiras 时间: 2005-9-4 23:13:23

Originally posted by mkb57288 at 2005-9-4 23:07
暗喻是literal 的一种---这个观点极端不同意，literal，就是字面直白的意思，是不会有metaphor的

恩恩,想想又不对, 理解错了, 看看改后的

作者: esmeiras 时间: 2005-9-4 23:41:48 标题: 拍好了

今天限时一个劲儿的失败，又超了三分多
------题目------0r x C4g$I#s w ~+}
Society should identify those children who have special talents and abilities and begin training them at an early age so that they can eventually excel in their areas of ability. Otherwise, these talents are likely to remain undeveloped.
------正文------
Although a society cannot develop quickly without certain experts or talents, I strongly disagree on  （disagree on, 不是这么搭配的吧，， with? 还有啊，这么强硬哦。。~~） the assertion that children have special talents （ prodigies , 留着备用，嘿嘿）should be identified and trained to ensure they can excel in given fields. Because by doing so, we actually strive to shape a society admiring elitism at the expense of equality.

In the ever-developing ear, (era ,大大) it seems tempting to agree with the speaker that we should cultivate talented children to help our society develop more quickly. After all, these children are so distinguished in given fields that they can accomplish the same achievement with considerable less effort than ordinary ones. In this case, it will be definitely redeemable loss that leaving such talents unexploited. However, I (cast doubt on …这个这个。。简单的意思有必要这么“妖”嘛， cast doubt on…有反面意思哦， cast doubt on 有把不好的言语攻击。。。的意思呢 ) the speaker's assertion that training them at an early age will bring about a better world, （by which I mean more equal, more balanced and more harmonious 一串形容词。。后面的名词呢？这样的句子是没有写完整的哦）

One threshold problem with the assertion（能不能换个啊， position, viewpoint, standpoint….上金山找找  ） is that we cannot choose fair criteria to determine which talents and abilities are more worthy cultivating. For better or not, in the society lionizing pragmatism, it is highly possible （你在啊狗里面不会也用了吧。。。~~标准的啊狗  ）that talents associated with economic success get preferred. For instance, a children talented in mathematics or physics is usually be given extraordinary attention and training, because his talents are likely to bring about certain direct breakthrough in information technology that can create a mint of money as a result. On the other hand, children talented in folklore study tends to flag into oblivion, for their success seems to be obsolete and can hardly result in any economic success. In fact, by streaming children to two groups separately labeled talented and ordinary, we seem to be encouraging certain elitism. In my observation, the stream can not justify itself by allocating educational resources unequally even at the very beginning of one's life. However, all the children are equal citizens in the future; therefore they should not be excluded from some privileges intended to a handful of people, which will deprive them of the opportunity for self-development.

Furthermore, it seems presumptuous for the speaker to assert that the well-trained children can eventually excel in their areas and benefit our society as a result. In my observation, （又来了。。~~少一点点重复，外加强调“自己“哦）  such training designed for so-called talented is usually featured by intensive inculcation of knowledge, which, too often, take up so much time that prevent the children from enjoying their childhood. Due to such psychological defect, these children are likely to take study as a boring and unfruitful process that brings about little happiness. After all, individuals, who are absent of interest, can hardly work effectively in given fields. Moreover, it is also possible that our educators underscore intellect and so-called talent nurture at the expense of skill in socialization, a valuable characteristic demanded by modern society. Without proper communication and coordination with others, any individual, no matter how talented he is, can never contribute significantly to our society.

In the concern whether the ethic maturity can keep pace with that of intellect, lies another reason why I take exception to the speaker's claim. If the well-trained children can only excel in given technical field while show little maturity in ethics, our society is likely to suffer from the effort of nurturing such talents. Consider the increasingly rampant criminals over Internet. Many of those attribute to some teenagers, who excel at information technology but lack certain maturity or wisdom to discern right from wrong. In this case, nurturing such talents before ethic mature accomplishes little to the well-being of our society and even serves as a backfire.

In final analysis, before fully accepting the author's assertion, we are obliged to make sure that the children are ethically qualified for the training. Moreover, we should also avoid elitism to prevent our society devolving into an unequal one.  （大大，很像啊狗呢）

好长呀。。。~~  着重改了细节一点的地方，只仍砖了，优点就不用多说了，嘿嘿

有点提醒一下，不知是我老眼昏花了呢还是为什么，整体感觉不是特别鲜明的说。看看b2 ，那么常，正面说了说反面，但是没有一个例子呀！斯皮尔博格好象是属于天才少年，还有莫扎特啊。高而夫Tiger Woods 再好的论证没有例子也会嫌罗嗦的。到encyclopedia 里面查一下， http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page 这个非常好，我以前准备这个题目查到了好多资料，打education, or “prodigies “

加油！

欢迎光临寄托家园留学论坛 (https://bbs.gter.net/)