argument51 交作业kito小组

kito9695UID: 209685

====================Argument===================
【题目】
Argument51（2005年2-9月总频23次）
The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
"Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment."

【翻译】
医生长期以来怀疑严重肌肉扭伤后的二次感染妨碍了一些患者迅速康复。这一假说现在被一项对两组患者的研究的初步结果所证实。第一组患者全部由专攻运动医学的Dr. Newland治疗肌肉损伤，他们在疗程中经常服用抗生素。他们的康复期平均比通常预期的快40％。第二组患者由综合医师Dr. Alton治疗，他们被给予糖丸，而患者相信他们在服用抗生素。他们的平均康复时间没有明显缩短。因此，任何被确诊为肌肉损伤的患者应被建议服用抗生素作为辅助治疗。

【题纲】
1、实验的有效性
第一，患者的典型性，是否覆盖所有年龄性别身体状况的患者
第二，患者的数量是否够多
2、平均恢复时间短不一定就好；恢复状况如何呢，以后是否复发呢？
3、实验结果值得怀疑，可能不是抗生素的作用
第一，没有任何证据显示两组患者基本情况相同，可能第一组患者本来身体状况就好于第二组患者，因此易于康复
第二，没有任何资料显示两者患者除了服用药物的区别以外，没有其它的辅助治疗方法，如第一组运动专家的患者可能被建议经常运动，因而有助于康复，而不是抗生素的作用
4、即使实验有效抗生素能否应用值得怀疑
第一，在没有证明有无其它副作用前也不能轻易使用
第二，肌肉拉伤不一定都二次感染，因此抗生素未必有效

【正文】（453words）
In the newsletter, the arguer claims that antibiotics is useful for all patients with muscle strain, basing on an experimental of two group such patients with different treatment. However, a carefull scrutiny reveals that the argument is not so convincing as it stands, which I will expain from several aspects below.

First of all, the study of two groups of patients is not so valid. There is no evidence indicating that the patients of the study is representative, including all kinds of such patients with different age or body conditions. Furthermore, is the sample big enough for the study? Without details about the cases talked above, the arguer could not make the hasty conclusion that the study is valid.

Next, the recuperation time is not a good indicator of the results of the study. It is possible that the first group of patients with short recuperation time may be easy to recrudesce; or it is also possible that the recovering bodies of the first group are still frail to live. Thus, the arguer should also take these possible issues into accout.

Besides, the result of the study of two groups of patients is open to doubt. For one thing, the study without information about the conditions of the two groups of patients can not convince us that taking antibiotics is surely helpful for the patients with muscle strain. Perhaps, the people in the first group is actrually more healthier than the ones in the second group and thus are easier to recover.
Fot the other, the quicker recovering may caused by other auxiliary ways such as more sports, rather than taking antibiotics. Without ruling out these possibilty the arguer could not assert that it is antibiotics that really work.

Last but not least, even if given that the validity of the study is reliable, it could not be afformed that antibiotics could be used to cure muscle strain. For the reason that we still don’t know the side effect of the patients with severe muscle strain after taking antibiotics; Also, not all the patients with muscle strain will suffer a secondary infections which need to be cured by antibiotics. Untill these problem become clear, antibiotics should not be used for all patients with muscle strain.

In sum, the arugment which claims that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment is unwarrented due to the explain above. To make the arugment logically accepted, the arguer should first gurantee that the study of two groups taken in thoroughly same conditions except the medicines taken and do further research about the side effect of the antibiotics.

jingjingtousUID: 2164820

Argument51（2005年2-9月总频23次）
The following appeared in a medical newsletter.
"Doctors have long suspected that secondary infections may keep some patients from healing quickly after severe muscle strain. This hypothesis has now been proved by preliminary results of a study of two groups of patients. The first group of patients, all being treated for muscle injuries by Dr. Newland, a doctor who specializes in sports medicine, took antibiotics regularly throughout their treatment. Their recuperation time was, on average, 40 percent quicker than typically expected. Patients in the second group, all being treated by Dr. Alton, a general physician, were given sugar pills, although the patients believed they were taking antibiotics. Their average recuperation time was not significantly reduced. Therefore, all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment."

【翻译】
医生长期以来怀疑严重肌肉扭伤后的二次感染妨碍了一些患者迅速康复。这一假说现在被一项对两组患者的研究的初步结果所证实。第一组患者全部由专攻运动医学的Dr. Newland治疗肌肉损伤，他们在疗程中经常服用抗生素。他们的康复期平均比通常预期的快40％。第二组患者由综合医师Dr. Alton治疗，他们被给予糖丸，而患者相信他们在服用抗生素。他们的平均康复时间没有明显缩短。因此，任何被确诊为肌肉损伤的患者应被建议服用抗生素作为辅助治疗。

【题纲】
1、实验的有效性
第一，患者的典型性 对了，看了你的提纲我才想到这点忘记批了，是否覆盖所有年龄性别身体状况的患者
第二，患者的数量是否够多
2、平均恢复时间短不一定就好 两组的时间不能作比较吧？模糊数据；恢复状况如何呢，以后是否复发呢？对，想的缜密！
3、实验结果值得怀疑，可能不是抗生素的作用
第一，没有任何证据显示两组患者基本情况相同，可能第一组患者本来身体状况就好于第二组患者，因此易于康复
第二，没有任何资料显示两者患者除了服用药物的区别以外，没有其它的辅助治疗方法，如第一组运动专家的患者可能被建议经常运动，因而有助于康复，而不是抗生素的作用
第三点的两个跟我想的一摸一样哟！^_^
4、即使实验有效抗生素能否应用值得怀疑
第一，在没有证明有无其它副作用前也不能轻易使用
第二，肌肉拉伤不一定都二次感染，因此抗生素未必有效
非常全面，赞！！！

【正文】（453words）
In the newsletter, the arguer claims that antibiotics is useful for all patients with muscle strain, basing on an experimental of two group such patients with different treatment. However, a carefull scrutiny reveals that the argument is not so convincing as it stands, which I will expain from several aspects below.开头好样的，这是我觉得the best and most practical and perfect and dreaming thesis in all arguments I have seen!!!^_^

First of all, the study of two groups of patients is not so valid. There is no evidence indicating that the patients of the study is representative, including all kinds of such patients with different age or body conditions phsical or health conditions. Furthermore, is the sample big enough for the study? Without details about the cases talked above, the arguer could not make the hasty conclusion that the study is valid. good！！

Next, the recuperation time is not a good indicator of the results of the study. It is possible that the first group of patients with short recuperation time may be easy to recrudesce it is the perfect wood; or it is also possible that the recovering bodies of the first group are still frail to live. Thus, the arguer should also take these possible issues into accout.还可以在此之前讲下recuperation time 的数据模糊性

Besides, the result of the study of two groups of patients is open to doubt. For one thing, the study without information about the conditions of the two groups of patients can not convince us that taking antibiotics is surely helpful for the patients with muscle strain. Perhaps, the people in the first group is actrually more healthier than the ones in the second group这里就不要再提了，因为你在第二段已经讲过body condition了 and thus are easier to recover.Fot for the other, the quicker recovering may caused by other auxiliary ways 好也！ such as more sports, rather than taking antibiotics. Without ruling out these possibilty the arguer could not assert that it is antibiotics that really work.这里可以讲下两个医生的水平问题呀？呵呵^_^
Last but not least, even if given that the validity of the study is reliable, it could not be afformed that antibiotics could be used to cure muscle strain. For the reason that we still don’t know the side effect of the patients with severe muscle strain after taking antibiotics; Also, not all the patients with muscle strain will suffer a secondary infections这个不对，应该是suffer muscle strain,你再想想 which need to be cured by antibiotics. Untill these problem become clear, antibiotics should not be used for all patients with muscle strain.可以讲一下这个generalization为什么不对,e.g.some patients are hypersensitive to antibiotics

In sum, the arugment which claims that all patients who are diagnosed with muscle strain would be well advised to take antibiotics as part of their treatment is unwarrented due to the explain above. To make the arugment logically accepted, the arguer should first gurantee that the study of two groups taken in thoroughly same conditions except the medicines taken and do further research about the side effect of the antibiotics. 结尾可以再简单些！

基本上是当作范文读的，不过可能有些语法错误我没有帮你找出来，sorry! afer all, your argument is indeed a good model for me!!!