argument42 [infinity]小组第12次作业

ashleyjrUID: 2206064

1.  机场旅客量增大不一定由于广告，去生态旅游
2。人均收入增加可能来自其他理由
3。保护当地自然环境不应该通过发展旅游
4。采用同一人作顾问，会导致两地的水平相同，没有优势

In this argument, the author cites a sample of the nearby country Bellegea, about the successful ecotourism policy, relying on the fact that the number of foreign visitors arriving at their main airport and per capita income has(单数) been both increased. He also recommends that they should develop ecotourism as well and that they should hire the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office as a consultant. However, close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little support for the recommendation.

To begin with, the author takes it for granted that the increased number of foreign visitors arriving at the airport leads to the popularity in the ecotourism, which attribute to the improvement of the per capita income. However, it is possible assuming that both enhancements are caused by some other attractive factors in the country such as the advanced world-wide fame and the development of the education or the economy. Lacking evidence of the direct statistics about the prevalence among either the local or the foreign people of the ecotourism, the author cannot convincingly conclude from these two reasons that the advertisement truly works.

Aside from this obvious detect of the author's logic, the author unfairly concedes that only through ecotourism could they preserve the natural environment of the country Paraterra. It is common sense that preparing to travel in the nature, people don't always care about what damage they made to the natural environment. It is so often to see waste things are spread everywhere, and little girls picking flowers, not to mention those fire in the mountains made by tourists every year. If the governments are tying to develop ecotourism on the purpose of preserving the environment, it only makes things worse.

Furthermore, even assuming the advertising campaign did work in order to promote ecologically sound tourism, the author's recommendation about hiring the current director in Bellegea as a consultant isn't favorable at all. First, all these successful consequences are probably been done by his predecessor so that there's no evidence showing that he's good enough. Second, the same person may bring a similar strategy and style that is almost the same as Bellegea. If so, Paraterra will not possess any advantages in this competition of advertising and perhaps won't get same good results as Bellegea did. Third, this person are not familiar with the local situation in Paraterra, therefore, the effects of his plan may not overcome one from a local citizen. Considering the reasons above, the current director from Bellegea is not the best qualified person.

In conclusion, the argument is unpersuasive as it stands. To strengthen the author's view, he should point out direct information about the reflection made by the advertising campaign. Moreover, to better evaluate the argument, the author should present the current Bellegea director's virtue comparing to the other possibilities in Paraterra.

[ 本帖最后由 ashleyjr 于 2006-7-6 13:12 编辑 ]

mayaUID: 199038

argument42 [infinity]小组第12次作业

1.  机场旅客量增大不一定由于广告，去生态旅游
2。人均收入增加可能来自其他理由
3。保护当地自然环境不应该通过发展旅游
4。采用同一人作顾问，会导致两地的水平相同，没有优势

In this argument, the author cites a sample of the nearby country Bellegea, about the successful ecotourism policy, relying on the fact that the number of foreign visitors arriving at their main airport and per capita income has(单数) been both increased. He also recommends that they should develop ecotourism as well and that 删了they should hire the current director of Bellegea's National Tourism Office as a consultant. However, close scrutiny of this evidence reveals that it lends little support for the recommendation.

To begin with, the author takes it for granted that the increased number of foreign visitors arriving at the airport leads to the popularity in the ecotourism, which attribute to the improvement of the per capita income. However, it is possible assuming that both enhancements are caused by some other attractive factors in the country such as the advanced world-wide fame？ and the development of the education or the economy. Lacking evidence of the direct statistics about the prevalence among either the local or the foreign people of the ecotourism, the author cannot convincingly conclude from these two reasons与lacking evidence重复 that the advertisement truly works.

Aside from this obvious detect of the author's logic, the author unfairly concedes that only through ecotourism could they preserve the natural environment of the country Paraterra. It is common sense that preparing to travel in the nature, people don't always care about what damage they made to the natural environment. It is so often to see waste things are spread everywhere, and little girls picking flowers, not to mention those fire in the mountains made by tourists every year. If the governments are tying to develop ecotourism on the purpose of preserving the environment, it only makes things worse.这段写的有点牵强，不如写成ecotorism并不是唯一的方法

Furthermore, even assuming the advertising campaign did work in order to promote ecologically sound tourism, the author's recommendation about hiring the current director in Bellegea as a consultant isn't favorable at all. First, all these successful consequences are probably been done by his predecessor so that there's no evidence showing that he's good enough. Second, the same person may bring a similar strategy and style that is almost the same as Bellegea. If so, Paraterra will not possess any advantages in this competition of advertising and perhaps won't get same good results as Bellegea did. Third, this person are not familiar with the local situation in Paraterra, therefore, the effects of his plan may not overcome one from a local citizen. Considering the reasons above, the current director from Bellegea is not the best qualified person.这段写的不错

In conclusion, the argument is unpersuasive as it stands. To strengthen the author's view, he should point out direct information about the reflection made by the advertising campaign. Moreover, to better evaluate the argument, the author should present the current Bellegea director's virtue comparing to the other possibilities in Paraterra.
整个都写的不错的，错误也都找得比较全面，就是Body2有点问题，再看看