:)
Issue 4 "No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study."
字数：425 谢谢修改~^^
The speaker alleges that all fields of study would progress enormous when outside knowledge and experience take into it, which I fundamentally agree. It is true that some research fields seem to be irrelated (也可以unrelated)superficially, yet in my view it is interaction among various studies which bring the significant development and benefits each other.
First, as a common sense that many subjects are correlative, considering which, it is easy to come the conclusion that using for reference is indispensable. Take the deriving of interdisciplinary as an example, in the beginning the basic research branches such as physics, chemistry and so on are isolated. However, they have the same basal mathematics and then the influence by each other brought out the inter-subject called physical chemistry which develop quickly as well as create many new fruits. Examples of this abound. Consequently, bringing relative information into the study can usually make enormous advantage.
Secondly, not only interdisciplinary leading from the subjects' effect commutative, but also the absorbing from else study areas which is interrelated would stimulate the development of its own. John Nash, the creator of an important theory called Nash balance, his success on economics based on the importing of series math theories. It is the mathematics build the upon economics theoretical institution. Abundance instances like this are around the corner. We can hardly image what the world would be if all research branches are parallel which never have any intersection. So the benefit of commutative absorbing should never be ignored if the fields are relative.
However, there also exit examples that abusing importing knowledge and experience would stagnate even prohibit the progress of research especially when the subjects are irrelative. As far as I know, many study fields are small and thoroughly researched which make the further exploration much more difficult and communicating little with other fields. Take this circumstance into account, the absorbing of any information based on other areas would probably meaningless even is wasting on resource and energy. What is worse, the abusing importing may lead the research to a wrong direction which would make research harsh and longer. If it is the case, the communication should not be encouraged when they are relative little.
To sum up, yet it is deleterious to absorbing the knowledge from others when they are irrelative as the discussion above. We can benefit much more if the right correlation among different subjects are found rather than disadvanges. Consequently, the importing of experience and knowledge of other study fields are indispensable especially in the information era recently.作者: ilabc 时间: 2008-2-18 00:16:31
The speaker alleges that all fields of study would progress enormous(enormously) when outside knowledge and experience take into it, which I fundamentally agree. It is true that some research fields seem to be irrelated (也可以unrelated)superficially, yet in my view it is interaction among various studies which bring the significant development and benefits each other.
First, as a common sense that many subjects are correlative, considering which, it is easy to come the conclusion that using for reference is indispensable. Take the deriving(derivation) of interdisciplinary as an example, in the beginning the basic research branches such as physics, chemistry and so on are isolated. However, they have the same basal mathematics and then the influence by each other brought out the inter-subject called physical chemistry which develop quickly as well as create many new fruits. Examples of this abound. Consequently, bringing relative information into the study can usually make enormous advantage.
Secondly, not only interdisciplinary(adj not n.) leading from the subjects' effect commutative, but also the absorbing from else(other) study areas which is interrelated would stimulate the development of its own. John Nash, the creator of an important theory called Nash balance, his success on economics based on the importing of series math theories. It is the mathematics build the upon economics theoretical institution. Abundance(abundant) instances like this are around the corner. We can hardly image what the world would be if all research branches are parallel which never have any intersection. So the benefit of commutative absorbing should never be ignored if the fields are relative.
However, there also exit examples that abusing importing knowledge and experience would stagnate even prohibit the progress of research especially when the subjects are irrelative. As far as I know, many study fields are small and thoroughly researched which make the further exploration much more difficult and communicating little with other fields. Take this circumstance into account, the absorbing of any information based on other areas would probably meaningless even is wasting on resource and energy. What is worse, the abusing importing may lead the research to a wrong direction which would make research harsh and longer. If it is the case, the communication should not be encouraged when they are relative little.
To sum up, yet it is deleterious to absorbing（absorb） the knowledge from others when they are irrelative as the discussion above. We can benefit much more if the right correlation among different subjects are found rather than disadvanges. Consequently, the importing of experience and knowledge of other study fields are indispensable especially in the information era recently.
两个分论点可以更清楚地在论证的段落里写出来。我是看到最后一段才完全看懂的。一些用词可以再到位一些。
继续努力。keep on fighting！