There is always a heated debate on what the government's role is.Some people credit that government should be responsible for regulation on economic development,while others feel that it is environment protection that calls for more attention from government.Government, no matter which country it is in, finds it a hard time hitting a balance between these two concerns of its people.But considering the character of economy and the relation between environment and economy, I would like to emphasize government's role in environment protection rather than in economic development.
Undoubtedly the mechanism of economy is fascinating.As economists put it, there is an invisible hand behind all those trades and transactions so that the economy itself reaches equilibrium efficiently.This equilibrium, free from too much interference of governments, benefits all those involved in it and enhances the well-being of the whole society .The measurements government can take are very limited: to punish
people
who harm the economy, to help the poor unemployed, to share information between participants in economy,etc.Most of the time the economy finds its own way towards efficiency in allocating resources.
Another reason, apart from the character of economy, lies in the dedicate relationship between environment and economy. It is in the Nature that we live, it is on resources from the Nature that we erect our temple of civilization.Without coal, glass, we cannot race into the Industrial Rvolution in the 18th century;without grass, water, we cannot raise our cattles and sheep; without sun and fresh air, we cannot stay in physical health.Then how can we carry on with our economic growth? Flourishing as economy may seem, it is in fact fragile and cannot endure without well-preserved environment.
It is high time for us to reckon again on government's role in economy and in environment. With environment the foundation of prosperity and in badly need of attention, I believe governments should take their action to preserve our environment now.
There is always a heated debate on what the government's role is. Some people credit that government should be responsible for regulation on economic development, while others feel that it is environment protection that calls for more attention from government. Government, no matter which country it is in, finds it a hard time hitting a balance between these two concerns of its people.(but,and最好不用句首) But considering the character of economy and the relation between environment and economy, I would like to emphasize government's role in environment protection rather than in economic development.4
Undoubtedly the mechanism of economy is fascinating. As economists put it, there is an invisible hand behind all those trades and transactions, so that the economy itself reaches equilibrium efficiently. This equilibrium, free from too much interference of governments, benefits all those involved in it and enhances the well-being of the whole society .The measurements government can take are very limited: to punish who harm the economy, to help the poor unemployed, to share information between participants in economy, etc. Most of the time the economy finds its own way towards efficiency in allocating resources.(排比例子很好)
Another reason, apart from the character of economy, lies in the dedicate relationship between environment and economy. It is in the Nature that we live, it is on resources from the Nature that we erect our temple of civilization .Without coal, glass, we cannot race into the Industrial Revolution in the 18th century;without grass, water, we cannot raise our cattle’s and sheep; without sun and fresh air, we cannot stay in physical health. Then how can we carry on with our economic growth? Flourishing as economy may seem, it is in fact fragile and cannot endure without well-preserved environment.(还是赞排比句子例子)
It is high time for us to reckon again on government’s role in economy and in environment. With environment the foundation of prosperity and in badly need of attention, I believe governments should take their action to preserve our environment now.
There is always a heated debate on what the government's role is.Some people credit(我没有见过这样的用法,个人觉得claim什么的比较好,如果lz 确定有这样的用法请告诉我一下哦)that government should be responsible for regulation on economic development,while others feel that it is environment protection that calls for more attention from government.Government, no matter which country it is in, finds it a hard time hitting(to make) 我又土了,不知道hit a balance的用法,然后it is a hard time to do sth) a balance between these two concerns of its people.But considering the character of economy and the relation between environment and economy, I would like to emphasize government's role in environment protection rather than in economic development.% c3 k$ _1 y1 A
- X( @: q$ x* g$ d3 }
Undoubtedly the mechanism of economy is fascinating.As economists put it, there is an invisible hand behind all those trades and transactions so that the economy itself reaches equilibrium efficiently.This equilibrium, free from too much interference of governments, benefits all those involved in it and enhances the well-being of the whole society .The measurements government can take are very limited( 想请教一下有take measurement这样的用法吗,我查了字典都没有找到): to punish; y1 B3 people* S# who harm the economy, to help the poor unemployed, to share information between participants in economy,etc.Most of the time the economy finds its own way towards efficiency in allocating resources.
Another reason, apart from the character of economy, lies in the dedicate(你是想用delicate?) relationship between environment and economy. It is in the Nature that we live, it is on resources from the Nature that we erect our temple(个人觉得用temple不是很好,或许lz看到过这样的寓意,我觉得没有把握的情况下就用system好了) of civilization.Without coal, glass, we cannot(could not,注意时态) race into the Industrial Rvolution in the 18th century;without grass, water, we cannot raise our cattles and sheep; without sun and fresh air, we cannot stay in physical health.Then how can we carry on with our economic growth? Flourishing as economy may seem, it is in fact fragile and cannot endure without well-preserved environment.
It is high time for us to reckon again on(It's high time for us reconed 注意it is high time, reckon 的用法, 前者后面跟过去式或加should,后者和on 搭配有特殊含义) government's role in economy and in environment. With environment the foundation of prosperity and in badly need of attention, I believe governments should take their action to preserve our environment now.
credit也有认为的意思,不过我觉得claim很好
google了一下 应该是strick a balance 当时想到就用了 记错了
take some measurements是采取措施的意思 eg:Take measurement to overcome the barrier for exporting to Europe.这词组说实话从高考用到四六级一直在用没问题 但还没怎么查过,网上还真难找,这个例句是网上的,不过大多数情况下用的take some effetive measurements
最后一段的错误你改的很好 我还真给忘了
it is a hard time 好像还比较常见吧 网上搜了一下 一般都是have a hard time to do不过我找到一篇It's a hard time to be a charity http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/services/2008-10-26-fundraising-crisis-donations-charities_N.htm
总之,很谢谢你给我所做的批改,有的东西用多了自己都不知道对不对,非常感谢。希望今后能继续互相帮助哦!