Issue174 特训作业之Chap1_4

so猫UID：148633

174 "Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places."

简要中文提纲：
1． 部分同意。虽然Laws应保持一定程度的相对稳定，但是其应当顺应不同条件，以适应社会需求的变化
2． 历史上，laws随着深刻的社会变革而发展的（美国宪法和黑人权利）
3． 现代，一些领域的重大事件常导致重大社会变革，也导致laws发展完善(政治/经济领域)
4． However, laws应保证相对的一致性与稳定以服务于国家和普通大众的利益
5． 结论


Laws, generally founded by legislatures or courts, are employed to govern a society and to regulate the behavior of its members. Should laws be fixed or be flexible? As far as I am concerned, laws should maintain a relative stable state in principle to some extent, however, they should be compliant to various circumstances in order to meet the changing requirements of society. 不错的开头


Throughout the history, laws are developed过去式？？？ accompanied with profound social changes. Consider, for example, the U.S. Constitution, which is usually regarded as the model constitution for numerous political regimes around the world, yet哪来的转折?不懂ing is not fixed or rigid since it was drafted in 1787. With the process of the democratization, people became to aware of their rights as the host of the country, thus in 1791 ten amendments were added to the Constitutions to ensure human rights. Until now, more than twenty-seven amendments were complemented, which is much more than 3 times words of the initial Constitution. For another example, in the 1940's and 1950's, with the effects of industrialization, the need for black labor was emerged, and along with the maturation of black education, more blacks became acute sensitive and were enraged about their old inferiority. Finally, with the civil rights movement, laws that entitled the equal rights to the blacks with the whites were enacted. Therefore, sparkling history inform单复数? us that laws should not be rigid in order to be compatible with society development and to better serve for the society.
怎么说 不是很符合我自己的写作习惯 你有提出你的观点 然后就是事例 很漂亮的事例 可惜 没有分析 更没有深入 感觉在堆砌 而不能达到令人信服的效果
最关键的是 你只谈到了有些国家已经这样做 但是 你提纲里写的是 应当
should和have done之间有本质的不同
这个是提纲的一个问题

On the modern era, some vital events in other realms often brought about crisis and essential social changes, which may cause laws to be completed and developed as well. In political sphere, for instance, the Congress strengthened or enacted several pieces of legislation, such as the Freedom of Information Act in 1966 and the War Power Act in 1973, to curb President’s abuses of "executive privilege" in the shock of Nixon’s resignation. In business world, the bankruptcy of Enron is a good case in this point. Enron's excessive fraud in its accounting, tax and stock have propelled legislators not only to reconsider the relaxed regulatory climate and take actions to investigate and punish violations in those areas, but also to begin to reform the rules and laws in accounting and in other relevant realms. So, consider, if there were no flexibility of laws, the politician arbitrarily abused their unlimited power, businessman might continue to fraud unscrupulously, investors might also speculate unruly, then how chaotic a society would be!
这一段不错 但同样 例子不要用得太堆砌
举例完了适当分析一下

However, it is necessary to keep relative stability of laws within a period of time toto? any society. Here "relative stability" does not mean fixed or stationary, but maintain a consistency in the principle of laws, which is to sever for the common interest of the state and most of its people as well. Because only in the guideline of the principle of laws, people can clearly know their obligations, predict the consequence of their behaviors, and thus win a sense of security. If there was no such general principle to guide laws, and laws were modified or altered with the event of any new circumstances, people would be confused and distrust laws and legal system, which would eventually lead to disorder and anarchy in the end.
这段的分析不错哦 不过 那个because only in
我个人比较不喜欢用这个 感觉很武断
用argu的观点就是说 你凭什么就用个only呢
证明呢 拿来~~~


In conclusion, laws are born and existed only in a certain societal environment, and as society evolves, laws also need to be advanced. Without the flexibility of laws, it will not be compatible with the developing demands of the society, which would lead to chaotic and disorder. Meanwhile, to preserve a relative steady society, laws also need to be in consistent in the principle of serving the common interests of the people so as to ensure that people possess a sense of security.

最后 提出一个建议
求你别用那么多的which从句了
我快昏了
换几个别的句式用吧~~~~~

so猫UID：148633

我来研究一下 我跟pooh的观点差别~~~

so猫UID：148633

果然是漂亮的逻辑啊
狒狒
我要hug你~