- 最后登录
- 2015-1-1
- 在线时间
- 48 小时
- 寄托币
- 286
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-26
- 阅读权限
- 20
- 帖子
- 0
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 195
- UID
- 183691
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 286
- 注册时间
- 2004-10-26
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 0
|
Is the beginner more likely than the expert to make important discoveries in any field of discoveries? I disagree this assertion according to at least three aspects. First of all, an expert owns more knowledge and abilities, which is of significance to important discoveries, than is a rookie.(好象不通) Secondly, long-term research of the expert will give rise to some marked experiences in the field he or she studies. Consider, for example, an experiment on a plant material about how to raise it more fast and efficient, how to use plant hormone and how to control the living condition for this kind of plant need a long time research. Finally, an expert is more likely to have a good communication and connection with his or her companies doing the same research. In another words, message transmission is fast. Therefore, I hold the point of view that whoever studies an area deeply is likely to get some tremendous and creative discoveries.(这一段最好分开写,第一段过长,开头是开头,理由是理由)
As we know, different from intelligent quotient (IQ), knowledge and abilities about a special field are not born with. On the contrary, they need a lot of time and energy to be accumulated. What lends the credence to me is the truth that a high intellectual elementary school student or even a pupil can not be called a expert no matter how much more he or she knows than his(or her) peers. This is due to the common sense that knowledge, which are necessary to your success, are not a talent but accumulation.(感觉和题目扣的不太紧)
Secondly, how much experience you gain in the field you are studying is another important criterion to measure your percent of chance to success. Put it to the most general, a political candidate needs to know how to advocate his audience in a speech, a scientist needs to know how to control the proportions of different experimental conditions. Moreover, an experienced player understands how to use the weakness of his competitor, and a experienced business man can make money in different commercial environment, even suffered great economical agony. Thus, experience is useful in every area people engaging in.(还是一样,ts应该和题目紧连,一目了然)
Finally, with the increasingly advance of communication and connection between people even in long distance, message transmission is another condition you will depend on. Consider, for example, the electronic mails and telephone can inform you the latest advances in nowadays world in your field. At this condition, having a great number of compa0nies who can help you with your research is especially important. An expert can build up his or her message net through different meeting, dating, negotiations, etc. And a long time working on the same field and the fame as an expert will give you these chances.
Admittedly, rookie, a newer in an area, has some advantages which cannot be substituted. On one hand, rookie's passion will trigger a person's potential power inside him. On the other hand, a rookie can avoid lots of interrupts comes from your past outstanding work, just like a expert. For example, you have no endless invitations meetings, dating or even advertisings at all. These time can be used for your own business and it will lead to you success.
In conclusion, although some advantages exist among learners such as the passion and lots of time, experts will be more likely to be successor to find some important discoveries due to the abilities, knowledge, experience and the message net built up by themselves.
看完整片后大致了解你的想法,也许你是把第一段的理由部分作为一个论点,然后2,3,4是分论点都来论述它,5段又是和第一个论点并列的?am i right?这样的结构好象很少见啊,把第一段拆开可能好一点,这样结构就清晰多了:) |
|