xiangtuo的作文帖~~

phoenix2011UID：3077553

35# xiangtuo

xiangtuoUID：3047550

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.

When I was a little girl, my teachers and parents always told me that in no circumstance could a child tell lie. And I did as their words. But I gradually found that it couldn’t work or even hurt myself or others in some situation. Then I doubt the words and conclude my own point that we could tell the lie or partly truth in certain occasion or relationship.
Admittedly, to be frank is a key character to a person as frank is a main factor to build trust with each other. Everyone in the society don’t want to contact with the person who always telling the lie. However, to be frank doesn’t mean always telling the truth but being honest and sincere. We all know that truth are always pain and may strongly hurt others, moreover, cause worse effect. Under certain circumstance can we tell a part of the truth or even tell the lie.
Sometimes we have to do like this because we don’t want to hurt or break the relationship with others, such as new friends or bosses. Take me for example. Tina, a new friend of mine, sent me a cup with strange pattern as my birthday present. I didn’t like it but I have to say that I loved its shape. She then gave me a hug and treated me as one of her best friends. I didn’t want to hurt her and lose her if I told the truth, and my words steady our friendship. The matters like this often occur on ourselves and around us. It is because we treasure and want to preserve the relationship that we don’t tell all the truth.
And sometimes we tell the lie just because it is a white lie. For instance, the final wish of a dying blind boy is to see the hoisting flag on the Tian’anmen Square, where is thousands mile from his bed, which draw attentions of the whole society. After several days’ prepared by all walks of life, the boy with his family board on the plane to Beijing, a capacious and well-decorated bus actually, and 2-hour driving to the Square after landing, he eventually get his destination which in fact is the playground of a high school. He then heard the whole process of the hoisting flag held by the students in the school. Finally he achieved his wish by the perfect cooperation of all the people just a week before his death. Can anyone say that this lie couldn’t be told? Lie as they told, they helped to finish a boy’s final wish which is significant to him. As far as I am concerned, white lie is needed under certain circumstance.
In conclusion, always telling the truth isn’t suit for any relationship or situation. And sometimes we could hide part of the truth or tell a white lie for hold the harmony of the relationship and protection for others.

karen0809UID：2551257

5.31作文

写得不错。欣赏！结构有层次,遣词造句灵活多样。
但是否两大点的第一点内容可以更充实一些？
另，末一段'safe"应该是“safety".
21# xiangtuo

zahngxinUID：2976843

32# zahngxin 不知道怎么回事，我回帖后就不能显示题字颜色了

zahngxinUID：2976843

xiangtuo(我爱豆包)--Agree or not. In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today..
Science and technology may be developed rapidly in the following twenty years, as the result of that, more and more high-tech machines and objects will be invented. Some people said that there would be fewer cars in use as cars would be replaced by new and more advanced vehicle. I don’t think so with my own points/while I rebut this for the following points.
Admittedly, we all don’t know what will be invented with the evolution of science and technology. Perhaps some superior transportation will come into world which will fascinate everyone’s eyesight. But the question/problem is it would cost too much to afford such a new/advanced vehicle though many people only want to own one, just as smart cars now. Many people are keen on them but few people could purchase one as the price of it is too high.(前面并没有说东西先进就会价格高，而你这里却用到了这个推理。我觉得这一段的主要意思你没有直接写出来，写出来之后会更好。第二段是不是说：二十年之后的车会比较先进，所以价格会比较高，很少有人能够买得起)
The first and the most important reason that cars won’t be fewer in the future is that cars are the most convenient transportation. Nowadays the fastest and the most advanced transportation is maglev whose moving is based on its special railway and unique
operation system. In this growing trend, advanced and high-technology transportation will be invented and even come into use in the two decades, but probably
be operate on a track, which means, it won’t an amenity for every single person. People may cover/ go through several streets to its station. As far as I am concerned, people won’t abandon convenient and comfortable cars of their own though new inventions have come into use. (我不知道这个cover用的对不对，我会用go through)
Furthermore, cars will be ameliorated and improved
as technology progress in the following 20 years. It will take a very long period of time to invent a bran-new transportation whose function is the same as that of cars’. Just as the steam train, which was first invented in 1804, was eventually replaced by combustion engine several decades years later. And now all the trains are of electric power. After several centuries, trains are still in use and more than ever before, but after being ameliorated, none could instead of/replace
them.(这一段也没有直接写出主要意思，你觉得呢？就是说吧你的原因写出来，你只写了“原”没有体现出“因”--关系)
In conclusion, I don’t think there will be fewer cars in use than there are today in 20 years as cars are the most convenient transportation and will be improved as technology progress. Cars would still be in the ascendant though new inventions occur and even come into use.

phoenix2011UID：3077553

30# xiangtuo

xiangtuoUID：3047550

Agree or not. In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.

Science and technology may be developed rapidly in the following twenty years, as the result of that, more and more high-tech machines and objects will be invented. Some people said that there would be fewer cars in use as cars would be replaced by new and more advanced vehicle. I don’t think so with my own points.
Admittedly, we all don’t know what will be invented with the evolution of science and technology. Perhaps some superior transportation will come into world which will fascinate everyone’s eyesight. But the question is it would cost too much to afford such a new vehicle though many people want to own one, just as smart cars now. Many people are keen on them but few people could purchase one as the price of it is too high.
The first and the most important reason that cars won’t be fewer in the future is that cars are the most convenient transportation. Nowadays the fastest and the most advanced transportation is maglev whose moving is based on its special railway and unique operation system. In this growing trend, advanced and high-technology transportation will be invented and even come into use in the two decades but probably operate on a track, which means, it won’t an amenity for every single person. People may cover several streets to get to its station. As far as I am concerned, people won’t abandon convenient and comfortable cars of their own though new inventions have come into use.
Furthermore, cars will be ameliorated and improved as technology progress in the following 20 years. It will take a very long period of time to invent a bran-new transportation whose function is the same as that of cars’. Just as the steam train, which was first invented in 1804, was eventually replaced by combustion engine several decades years later. And now all the trains are of electric power. After several centuries, trains are still in use and more than ever before, but after being ameliorated, none could instead of them.
In conclusion, I don’t think there will be fewer cars in use than there are today in 20 years as cars are the most convenient transportation and will be improved as technology progress. Cars would still be in the ascendant though new inventions occur and even come into use.

鱼.小白UID：2754339

Their reading passage and the listening material discuss about the topic of how the great houses were used . The author gives three theories but the speaker argues( disagrees) and gives reasons in the lecture.
First of all, the reading contends that the great houses were for living while the lecture argues against it. The professor points out that if there once lived hundreds of people, it would have many fire places. In fact, the fire place was very few over there. The fire places for 10 families were found in the largest room which could contain hundreds families.( you should write what this discovery tells us. such as, the very few number of the fire places shows the great houses were not for living purpose.)

The second theory is that the great houses were used to hold crops. On the contrary, the professor in the lecture casts doubt by saying that if there was once used as store room(warehouse, Granary) for grain maize, why no any grain maize on the floor, or any big containers for grain maize were found.

The third theory is that the houses were used as special ceremonial centers. Nevertheless, this is challenged by the lecturer. He doesn’t think that the enormous mound formed by a pile of old material found in the park was the proof of special ceremony remaining, but the building material which didn't use up.( what do you mean by the building materials which didnt use up) In this way, the professor refutes the reading passage.

xiangtuoUID：3047550

5.24综合 TPO5
Their reading passage and the listening material discuss the topic of how the great houses were used . The author gives three theories but the speaker argues and gives reasons in the passage.
First of all, the reading contends that the great houses were for living while the lecture argues against. The professor contradicts that if there once lived hundreds of people, it would have many fire places. In fact, the fire place there is very few. The fire places for 10 families were found in the largest room which could contain hundreds families.
The second theory is that the great houses were used to hold crops. On the contrary, the professor in the lecture casts doubt by saying that if there was once used as storing grain maize, why no grain maize on the floor, or any big containers for grain maize were found.
The third theory is that the houses were used as special ceremonial centers. Nevertheless, this is challenged by the lecturer. He doesn’t think that the enormous mound formed by a pile of old material found in the park was the proof of special ceremony remaining, but the building material which didn't use up. In this way, the professor contradicts the reading passage.

hypnosis@1122UID：2904175

改的有点晚了，sorry
好好养病，好点了再帮我改

鱼.小白UID：2754339

revised.

xiangtuoUID：3047550

5.19 独立
In the contemporary era, with the development of the society, people are challenged by the rapid pace of working and living, and don’t have enough time to entertainment and relax themselves. As a result of that, some people would not feel happy and attributes it to too much possessions. I don’t agree with people would be happier if they had fewer possessions with my own point.
Admittedly, some poor people feel happier than the rich just because they are satisfied with the circumstance and don’t want more , especially fortune. As an old Chinese saying goes, a man who is contented will be happy. The person would feel happy if they are content with their life, no matter less or more possession.
Besides, the people without enough possession won’t feel delight when they face to the high price of groceries, clothing or apartment house. For instance, my friends faced to a big problem which is a big problem which is no money to afford an apartment house bothered a friend of mine for a long period of time as he would marry. He didn’t buy any new clothes and ate simple and unadorned for nearly one year. Last time I met him, he said to me that only he live the life like this for 2 years more could he bought an apartment which is just for 2 people. Now he feel depressed and hopeless for his life.
As far as I am concerned, more money could be used to entertain and satisfy demanding which may be a dream of many people. Many people hope to be millionaire just for admire products or travelling to anyplace in the world. Didn’t a man feel unhappy if he get enough money for travelling to his dreaming island, or didn’t a girl feel unhappy if she own enough money for her dreaming luxurious bags. I think all these answers are no. More money could be used to ornament our lives and achieve dreams.
In conclusion, people won’t be happier if he have fewer possessions, as he would bother with daily problems and lose chances to entertainment and achieve dreams.

leungaceUID：3059264

5.17 改
Nowadays, with the development of the society, a去掉！various kinds of movies and televisions can be chosen by different groupgroups of people. Audience is all fascinated in the story, ending or else, no matter loving movies or soap TV playplays. But have you ever found that movies and televisions always showed audience good people being rewarded and bad people being punished? Some oppose the status while the others support. I agree with it with my own points.（首先，开头的第一句话不是说写得不好，但是这种说法太普遍了，建议你多想些描述开头的方式，在没有别的方法或者实现想不出其他的方法开头下，再用这个句子开头。其次，首段的段尾应该清楚表达出your points are what ??!!!!）8 i& u. |6 i! K
Admittedly, the final result of good and bad people being doom may limit the change of the movies and televisions. But that ending is exactly what audience wants to see. In everyone’s mind, the evil should be punished and the hero should be rewarded. Moreover, just as audience predicts the ending, they can enjoy the thrilling and unexpected development of the plot. （这一段你要用例子或者更详细的对论点的分析来支撑你的观点啊。直接这么写是不够的！！！）
It is so dangerous and turbulence that the society will be if more movies and televisions with the good not being rewarded and the bad not being punished were showed. Because the outcome like that challenged the standard of moral of public. What’s more, some people imitate the plot and do bad things to other people or society dreaming not being punished. In this condition, the movies and television make a very bad impression to the society. （太chinglish了，多在遣词造句上下功夫！）
Even worse influence will have on children and teenagers, as they are at the stage of developing in physical. I still remember that in my childhood, my parents and teachers always told me that don’t do bad things or I would be punished. I was afraid of being punished, as the result of that, I didn’t dare to do any bad things. It is very important to children and teenagers to contribute this point as it will go along with the whole life. At this time of utmost importance, the movies and televisions with the good not being rewarded and the bad not being punished would disturb the growth of little audience even lead them to crime. （如果你把你父母叫你不要做坏事的例子换成你父母叫你不要看一些暴力的电影从而使你懂得遵守规则之类的，是不是更好支撑the influence from movies and tv programs呢？）
In conclusion, I agree with the movies and televisions should always show audience the good being rewarded and the bad being punished, no matter from the aspect of keeping the safe and harmony of the society or the well environment for the growth of children or teenagers

zjxdxokzzyUID：3072531

5.17独立改好

EMP_CHENGUID：2762848

5月16

独立