ARGUMENT76 同志们, 饱含被ETS羞辱的来挨砖了! [复制链接]

skater
UID：2116878

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 423
注册时间: 2005-7-14
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2005-7-23 19:02:29 |只看该作者 |正序浏览

In this argument, the author concludes that the Luxess is truly effective in improving the condition of facial skin .To support this argument, the author provides the evidence that a group of volunteers participated in a study of consumer responses to the new Luxess face cream and the fact that every morning for a month, they washed their faces with mild soap and then applied Luxess consequently reported a marked improvemet in the way their skin looked and felt. However, a careful examination of this argument would reveal how groundless the conclusion is.
Firstly, the study of consumer responses to the new product seems meaningless. The author fails to provides any information that would increase the credibility of the study. The identity of the volunteers and conductor of the study as well as their relationship with the Luxess company are all unknown to the reader. It is doubtful that whether the study is only a means to advertise. In addition, if it is true that the volunteers and the conductor are neutral about the company, to obtain a telling conclusion, the quantity and quality are needed based on the statistical method. But , the author does not indicate the information such as the number , the gender , or the basic condition of their skin of the volunteers. Thus, the reader get little idea of the ground about the study at all . The study show nothing use except a means of a advertisement.
Second, the author falsely establishes a causal relationship between the fact that the volunteers washed their faces with mild soap and then applied Luxess every morning for a month and the report that they gain a marked improvement in the way their skin looked and felt. It is hard to say whether the Luxess really took effect during this period of time. Probably, they get the so-called improvement would attribute to the mild soap they used during this month . After all , no evidence such as a chemical experiment has provides it is the Luxess who took effect in improving. Meanwhile, the author offers no information about the use period nor the appropriate applying time because the volunteers use only at morning and merely for one month. Among the cosmetics, few products would take effect efficiently only in one month. Therefore, sufficient reasons are support the suspect about the causal relationship .
Finally, the author treats the fact that a marked improvement in the way the skin looked and felt as the another fact that Luxess truly effective in improving the condition of facial skin. For example, some temporary improvement such as making the skin cleaner, more beautiful or satiny does not equates a whole improvement of the skin which also dependent on some other factors. One could even get some improvement of the skin by take some kinds of physical exercise while the physical condition would also influence the condition of one's skin. So the conclusion based on the reports from the volunteers is ungrounded.
To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the argument maintains. To strengthen the argument the arguer would have to provide more evidence concerning the volunteers and conductors. To better evaluate this argument, we would need more information regarding the study and the Luxess real effect.

[ Last edited by skater on 2005-7-23 at 22:14 ]

8月26日，北京 527933543

回应
0