[i习作temp] Issue27 第一次写issue，字数够不够啊 [复制链接]

mystra
UID: 181461

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 68
注册时间: 2004-10-8
精华: 0
帖子: 0

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2004-11-27 15:14:38 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

Issue27
No one can possibly achieve success in the world by conforming to conventional practices and conventional ways of thinking.

Whether success can be achieved by conforming to conventional practice and ways of thinking or not raises, at the first place, the question of how to define success. What is known to all is that the term "success" can be defined in various ways and so that it has never come to a definite definition. Since the ambiguous nature of "success”, we should evaluate the assertion of the speaker on a case-by-case basis according to the different definition of success.

On one hand, success can be defined as the great achievements in some fields where creativity is demanded and, even worshipped, such as the progress of academic research in pure science, the brilliant strategy for a firm in an oligopolistic market and the cunning maneuvers in arts of war. All the above require a creative sensitivity while deny the conventional practices and conventional ways of thinking, which can lead research to nothing but cliché, trap the firm in a condition that its all strategies can be pre-calculated by its competitors or confine a troop in conventional tactics which the opponent knows well and deals with effortlessly. In those fields, only a maverick mind, even heterodox, could be grant the possibility of success. For example, the contribution of Einstein and the Alliance's sudden strike in Normandy. We simply cannot imagine that Einstein could reach his Photon Hypothesis if he only knows what Newton had said nor can we assume that the German force would be so easily deceived if the generals of Alliance had not presented illusory evidence of unloading their troops elsewhere.

On the other hand, when success is to be both the good outcome of and reward to our day-by-day effort on our works or be harmony and happiness of our life, the position of conventional practices and conventional ways of thinking will totally reversed. You don't need any creativity while typing the documents, cultivating your land or working on assemble-line and what you require is just to conform to conventional practices, by which your effort can be well paid as you've expected. When harmony and happiness of life is concerned, conventional practices and ways of thinking are usually considered the golden rule in this domain, while, contrarily, this time, heterodox thought can be devastating to the harmony of life especially family life, for the reason that other members may brook no maverick behaviors. So, as to the goal involves less creativity, conforming to the convention is always a necessity for success.

After all, everyone has his or her own definition of success which varies from one to another, and thus leads us to decide for ourselves whether to appeal to conventional practices and conventional ways of thinking in our paths of securing our own successes.

回应
0

使用道具举报

mystra
UID: 181461

新手上路

Rank: 1

声望: 0
寄托币: 68
注册时间: 2004-10-8
精华: 0
帖子: 0

沙发

发表于 2004-11-28 21:39:06 |只看该作者

没人评价。。。难道实在不上台面？
那咋办，我再一个月就考了

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报

lovebrian
UID: 157127

超级会员

Rank: 7 Rank: 7 Rank: 7

声望: 0
寄托币: 555
注册时间: 2004-3-3
精华: 3
帖子: 2

板凳

发表于 2004-11-29 18:21:35 |只看该作者

粗看了一下
字数没什么问题，关键是切题方式
case by case是很好的方式但是就这个题目来说对success分情况讨论比较困难而且也比较难达到传统这个点子上面感觉可能比较难以写好再者两种分情况也很难概括所有的success 至少是大部分吧？

所以感觉题目应该从“传统的是否有效”来着手
也就是：把你的case by case转换一下突出传统与success的必然因果关系而不是绕的远到去定义成功的概念了

其实，传统的和创新的是矛盾且并存的采取反对的观点也没问题当然可以在末尾加一个让步

呵呵希望我说的不会太多让你更糊涂了 ^_^

别再搜我帖子了

使用道具举报