寄托天下
寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托语言类备考版 › TOEFL考试(IBT)讨论版 › TOEFL(IBT)作业区 › writing by TCWH
12下一页
返回列表
查看: 4824|回复: 15
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[作文] writing by TCWH [复制链接]

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-7 16:43:50 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use?

A great deal of money is used to support the scientific researches by government every year, for those researches are able to resolve some difficult which impede the development of social and then to bring a better life condition for people. Some individuals claim that scientific researched which have no practical use should be supported by government. Doing scientific researches, however, not only needs a long time and many specialists, but requires a huge financial support as well. If there is no practical use, it is no doubt a kind of waste.

As we all know, the finance which is used to support scientific research is limited, but the scientific researches could be countless. Thus, the money should be used in a right place which is able to truly resolve practical issues to let people live more convenient. Recently, for instance, the increase in gasoline price is a big problem which people concern. If government put the money on this issue to find a new substitute which is not only in favor of environment but also less expensive for gasoline, people do not need to sigh when they watch the gasoline counter jumping, meanwhile the degree of global warming would be relieved. In the contrast, if the research is no practical use, not only would the huge finance be wasted, but a great deal of time of the experts would be wasted as well. Therefore, facing so many choice, government should support the money to a research which brings a benefit for social.

Furthermore, the finance of the government mostly is the tax which is collected from people. So, government should manage to bring a benefit for people using the money instead of doing meaningless research. For instance, Japanese government put a great deal of money on the research of predicting the earthquake, for earthquake happens frequently in their country. By providing a accurate predict of earthquake for their people, Japanese are able to escape more successfully when earthquake happens. What is more, their country would encounter less loss in both people and possession. In short, government support money to a scientific research which has practical use would have more profit and are good for people.

Granted, some scientific researches which is no practical use may expand people’s knowledge, bring a different angle for people to think of the questions. But, compared with those scientific researches which are more helpful to people, social and world, the limited finance should be used in a more efficient way.

相关帖子 Updated by 2024.11.22
回应
0

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

沙发
发表于 2011-4-10 17:32:47 |只看该作者
1# tcwh6688

Do you agree that the government should support the scientific research even there’s no practical use?

A great deal of money is used to support the scientific researches by the government every year, for those researches are able to resolve some difficulties which that impede the development of social (social what? 'Social' when used as a noun has a very specific meaning as 社交活动, and I don't think that's what you intend to express here.) and then to bring a better life condition for people. Some individuals claim that scientific researches which have no practical use should also (Because the researches you have described in the first sentence are obviously the ones 'of practical use'.) be supported by the government. Doing scientific researches, however, not only needs a long time and many specialists, but requires a huge financial support as well. If there is no practical use, it is no doubt a kind of waste.

As we all know, the finance (You mean 'budget'?) which is used to support scientific researches is limited, but the scientific researches could be countless. Thus, the money should be used in a right place which is able to truly resolve practical issues to let people live more conveniently (Strictly speaking, you don't describe people's lives as 'convenient'. This word means 'facilitating, near at hand, affording advantage'. It is often associated with time scheduling or location more than anything else.). Recently, for instance, the increase in gasoline price is a big problem which people are concerned with . If the government puts the money on this issue to find a new substitute which is not only in favor of the environment but also less expensive than gasoline, people do not need to sigh when they watch the gasoline counter jumping, meanwhile the degree of global warming would be relieved. In the contrast, if the research is of no practical use, not only would the huge finance (See beginning of paragraph.) be wasted, but a great deal of time of the experts would be wasted as well. (I'm not criticizing your argument but I do want to provide some perspectives. It's not that researches have not been done on alternative energy resources, but rather whether the government is willing to put in the money to deploy and promote the use of it - note, this is beyond the capability of any research. Let me give you an example: would you prefer to use natural gas to fuel your car, if there is only one natural gas station in your city and you have to queue forever to get your car refilled? Even though natural gas is clean, cheap, and so much better than oil? Yes, you have something better than gasoline, but you need to build an entire infrastructure for people to really start using that better energy source. Who do you think has the power to do such things? Things do not just get done because there is a research. That is often only the very first step. If the government cannot guarantee the systematic deployment of any good thing done by any research, then you're in effect still going to waste a lot of money and time because the research results are not being put into use. So, after all this, how do you judge which researches are 'practical' and which ones are not? Think about it.) Therefore, facing so many choices, government should support the money to a research which brings a benefit for social (Again...social what?).

Furthermore, the finance of the government mostly is the tax which is collected from people. So, the government should manage to bring a benefit for people using the money instead of doing meaningless research. For instance, the Japanese government put a great deal of money on the research of predicting the earthquake, for earthquake happens frequently in their country. By providing a accurate prediction of earthquake for their people, the Japanese are able to escape more successfully when an earthquake happens. What is more, their country would encounter less loss in both people and possessions. In short, the government that supports money to a scientific research which has of practical use would have more profit and are good for people. (Ahh..but the Japanese were still not able to escape from that great earthquake and tsunami of the century..and what is more, what once was thought to be a great energy source has become a major threat because the power of nature is simply beyond whatever precautions men can take. Again, it comes back to that simple question - how much 'practical'-ness is useful, and how much is not? How do you judge? Something can very well be practical one moment and entirely outrageous the next. Again, this is not to say you're wrong. Simply something for you to ponder on.)


Granted, some scientific researches which is of no practical use may expand people’s knowledge, bring a different angle for people to think of the questions. But, compared with those scientific researches which are more helpful to people, social (Now I start to think you mean 'the society'..) and the world, the limited finance should be used in a more efficient way.


总结：


乱用定冠词和which is从句型请注意一下。。很多地方根本不需要从句也使用从句的，会让你的文章十分拗口。


陈述方面，你对于反面论点的处理有些苍白。论述上没有什么太大的问题，对于practical use和research的理解虽然比较偏于表面不过并不对文章本身有什么影响，所以还是请多注意一下语言简洁和用词准确为好。
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！
【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
板凳
发表于 2011-4-12 19:23:43 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 tcwh6688 于 2011-4-18 02:02 编辑

Do you agree or not with following statement: most people solve their important problems by themselves or with the help from their families; the help from government is not necessary.

The life, it seems, is filled with a great variety of problems waiting to be solved. Some problems, relatively personal, can be handled through constantly effort by individuals. Nevertheless, when it comes to those complex ones involved more aspects, resorting to government is supposed to be the only and best option, for its stronger influence and power.

It is plausible that people may pride of their independence for disposing of varieties of issues by themselves. However, if we examine such a statement carefully, we will definitely find it far from the truth. In fact, the help from Government has permeated everywhere in people’ life, from basic necessities to maintaining public order. Without government, people can never be able to conceive of a normal life, not mention well-being. The help from government is even as small as controlling the price of food in market, as big as assuring the security of whole society. For instance, Yangyang, a three years old boy, was kidnapped when he was playing in yard of our community last year. After disappearance for several hours, the boy’s parents were aware of what had happened. They almost find every possible place, but nothing. The boy’ father finally resorted to the Police, hoping to get his son back. One month later, the boy was finally found in a remote outskirt through a hard investigation by policeman. Owed to the police, otherwise boy might never be able to see his parents again. Consequently, the help from government is quite necessary.

Furthermore, apparently, government has more advantages to help people get out of plight than by people themselves in the same situation, for having more funding and stronger influence. For instance, in some regions, a great many children cannot accept the basic education, because they are born in poor families. With rare exceptions, they never have the chance to improve their lives. Unless they have the opportunity to learn knowledge to change their life, those children would have difficulties finding decent jobs and making a decent life. In this case, only can government offer the most efficient way to solve this issue, rather than rely on their own ability. The government built a new school for those children and let them have class without charge. Plus, the needy facilities would receive subsidy to some extent offered by government. With the help from government, those children not only have the opportunity to turn to be someone but are able to do contribution to their hometown after growing up as well. Therefore, it is necessary to gain the help from government

To sum up, government serves people, protects people, supervises people, is a powerful support and back to people. Thus, people are by not mean able to live without the help from government.

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

地板
发表于 2011-4-18 22:32:03 |只看该作者
3# tcwh6688

Do you agree or not with following statement: most people solve their important problems by themselves or with the help from their families; the help from government is not necessary.

The life (If you use 'the', the noun should be specific or non-ambiguous, e.g. 'the life of <someone>', 'the life of a human being'. If you want to use 'life' as a collective, generic noun, it should be without any article.), it seems, is filled with a great variety of problems waiting to be solved. Some problems, relatively personal, can be handled through constantly effort by individuals. Nevertheless, when it comes to those complex ones involved more aspects, resorting to the government (Here you can't use 'government' as a collective noun because that would mean 'any government and/or all governments'. I know it might be hard to understand when to and not to use 'the', but for now just remember this is how it is used.) is supposed to be the only and best option, for its (What is this 'it'? The 'option'?) stronger influence and power.

It is plausible that people may pride of their independence in disposing of varieties of issues by themselves. However, if we examine such a statement carefully, we will definitely find it far from the truth. In fact, the help from the Government has permeated everywhere in people’ lives, from basic necessities to maintaining public order. Without a government, people can never be able to conceive of a normal life, not to mention well-being (But pre-historic people survived pretty well without much of a government..). The help from government is even as small as controlling the price of food in market (It might seem small but it isn't so, really..), as big as assuring the security of the whole society. For instance, Yangyang, a three years old boy, was kidnapped when he was playing in the yard of our community last year. After disappearance of several hours, the boy’s parents were aware of what had happened. They almost find every possible place (You mean, they 'searched' every possible place..), but nothing. The boy’ father finally resorted to the Police, hoping to get his son back. One month later, the boy was finally found in a remote outskirt through a hard investigation by policemen. Owed to the police (This is not a complete sentence.), otherwise the boy might never be able to see his parents again. Consequently, the help from the government is quite necessary. (Well. But if a kid can be kidnapped out of his own yard in broad daylight, isn't that quite an indicatioin that social security is no good and the government is not really doing its job well? Especially when you said that the government is helping to assure 'the security of the whole society'? Think carefully about how you phrase your example and your statements so it at least doesn't crash back on itself.)

Furthermore, apparently, the government has more advantages to help people get out of plights than by people themselves in the same situation, for having more funding and stronger influence. For instance, in some regions, a great many children cannot receive the basic education, because they are born in poor families. With rare exceptions, they never have the chance to improve their lives. Unless they have the opportunity to learn knowledge to change their lives, those children would have difficulties finding decent jobs and making a decent life. In this case, only can the government offer the most efficient way to solve this issue, rather than rely on their own ability. The government built (Now I'm all confused by your use of tense. Are you describing a general situation, or are you describing an actual event that had happened?) a new school for those children and let them have class without charge. Plus, the needy facilities would receive subsidies to some extent offered by the government. With the help from the government, those children not only have the opportunity to turn to be someone?? but are able to do contribute to their hometown after growing up as well. Therefore, it is necessary to gain the help from the government (Well. Again, a lot of such schools are not built with funding from the local governments but rather funds from charities..the local government is involved mostly because of administration rights. But I'm not saying this to contend your writing. This paragraph is well written.)

To sum up, the government serves people, protects people, supervises people (This, you never talk about in the essay.), is a powerful support and back?? to people. Thus, people are by not means able to live without the help from government. (If you compare this with the question it should be easy to see how far you're off..the question is about whether government help is necessary for important problems, not whether people can or cannot live without government help..)

总结：

你的语言功底其实不错，就是冠词和有时会出现很拗口的类直翻的表达，请注意一下。

论述方面，把你结论段的最后一句话和问题放在一起，应该就很容易看出来了。。你全篇都在注重government help是不是necessary，但是问题是有important problems这个限制的。。你在开头段里只是提了一下complex，然后就再也没点过这个方面。虽然你的例子举得很恰当，但是因为你没点到题目这一点，造成你最后并没有支持到题目多少。。所以请注意全面地点题。。
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
5楼
发表于 2011-4-23 14:55:27 |只看该作者
谢谢国宝姐
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

6楼
发表于 2011-4-24 17:01:22 |只看该作者
5# tcwh6688
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
7楼
发表于 2011-4-26 00:30:51 |只看该作者
作文
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

8楼
发表于 2011-4-27 00:25:00 |只看该作者
7# tcwh6688

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
9楼
发表于 2011-5-2 02:33:33 |只看该作者
作文
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

10楼
发表于 2011-5-3 23:40:34 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 mpromanus 于 2011-5-4 10:32 编辑

9# tcwh6688

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
11楼
发表于 2011-5-8 17:31:44 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 tcwh6688 于 2011-5-12 22:32 编辑

作文
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

12楼
发表于 2011-5-14 15:58:06 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 mpromanus 于 2011-5-14 16:12 编辑

11# tcwh6688

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
13楼
发表于 2011-5-24 22:48:39 |只看该作者
作文
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

使用道具 举报

mpromanus
UID: 2565872

Rank: 8Rank: 8

声望
762
寄托币
12296
注册时间
2008-10-30
精华
4
帖子
907

美版2016offer达人 IBT Zeal IBT Smart IBT Elegance 2016 US-applicant

14楼
发表于 2011-5-25 23:20:10 |只看该作者
13# tcwh6688

附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册
2016 fall语言学Phd申请情况叨叨帖
DMC 3表忠心花痴帖！

使用道具 举报

tcwh6688
UID: 2671847

Rank: 3Rank: 3

声望
2
寄托币
399
注册时间
2009-7-26
精华
0
帖子
2
15楼
发表于 2011-6-9 23:25:15 |只看该作者
本帖最后由 tcwh6688 于 2011-6-10 11:03 编辑

作文
附件: 你需要登录才可以下载或查看附件。没有帐号？立即注册

使用道具 举报

12下一页
返回列表
RE: writing by TCWH [修改]
高级模式
B Color Image Link Quote Code Smilies
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

问答
Offer
投票
面经
Q
【问答/瑞典】uhr.se要怎么看？
A
用瑞典语版本，有统计数据，HT24是24fall，把自己的意向专业瑞典语输入，或者按照学校或者关键词筛选都可以。
Q
【问答/瑞典】瑞典接不接受雅思单科重考？
A
接受的。
Q
新南cs想transfer美本cs，均分多少才行，美方大概是什么级别的学校
A
本科的？这里申硕博的讨论的偏多点
Q
本科211地理信息科学专业申请港五。
A
意思是刚大三？目前保住bg，语言6以上（看项目要求）。港五稳的。GRE也是看项目，一般香港很少强制要GRE的项目建议，GPA...
more
Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin
business analytics
MSc | 25Fall | Con Offer
渥太华大学
system science and engineering
Meng | 25Fall | Offer
南洋理工大学
化学科学与仪器
MSc | 25Fall | Con Offer
布里斯托大学
Economics
MSc | 25Fall | Offer
more
985本科建筑学港新欧澳选校选择
985，四分制GPA3.56，雅思7.5/5.5，建筑学专业，确定不去英国和美国，尽量读两年硕，能留就留，留不了进外企事务所，对转行比较中立不排斥，不反对（夸张点说就是：不是学建筑就要死要活的，也不是不学建筑就要死要活的）想问下选哪个学校比较好呀（港大建筑学因为作品集要求问题不考虑，欧洲接受学第二外语，但是德语区要APS不太考虑）
新加坡VS蒙特利尔-读书移民向
36岁，搞国际工程施工的，想移民，目前加拿大康考迪亚给了2年工程硕士offer，南洋理工给了一年理学硕士offer，整体算下来两者费用差不多。康考迪亚是英校，魁北克不能走学习类PEQ了，要考法语走走工作类移民。南洋理工毕业后有一年的找工作签证，但是大龄不太友好，估计不好拿身份，小孩在新加坡读国际学校也不便宜。 现在纠结去哪里，南洋理工是梦中情校，QS排名前十，康考迪亚出了加拿大都没人知道。
佐治亚理工深圳gtsi msa还是港中深imba
想问下这两个学校哪个在互联网厂认可度更好？ 楼主西电管科本，加上这两个可以当20-30名的985本硕吗
多大MIE or 米理管理工程 or 荷兰
想知道在想留在当地的前提下哪个offer机会大一些，本科商科, 有些code和数据分析基础
more
Lingnan University
eBSCM
1.自我介绍2.你的专业背景和工作经历可以怎么帮助你学习这个项目3.职业规划4.工作中遇到的困难，你是如何应...
Royal College of Art
innovation design engineering
1.自我介绍2.还申请了什么院校3.介绍一个项目4.有没有最喜欢的IDE项目5.未来研究方向
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
自动化
港理工Phd面试记录自我介绍老师提问：1.哪些是独立完成的工作2.Motivation Inovation分别是什么交流环节...
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
TLE
1.自我介绍2.具体项目相关3.关于本专创业想法
more
最新
精华
长期答疑｜欢迎申请！香港理工大学人力资源管理理学硕士课程-2025年火热招生中！
普渡大学全奖博士/博士后招生
11.28 19:30 | 毕业起薪高 工作一年学费回本？昆杜研究生项目优点真的太太太太多了！
【国际会议】【葡萄牙】全球临床肿瘤学会议 (GCOC 2025)
美国加州圣塔克拉拉大学计算机科学与工程系招收全奖博士生 (长期有效）
美国加州圣塔克拉拉大学计算机科学与工程系招收全奖博士生 (长期有效)
美国加州圣塔克拉拉大学计算机科学与工程系招收全奖博士生 (长期有效)
香港科技大学广州｜智能制造学域博士招生宣讲会—南方科技大学专场
11.28 18:30 | 香港大学社会科学硕士（社会数据分析）线上公开课暨宣讲会等你来！
香港科技大学广州｜可持续能源与环境学域博士招生宣讲会—中国科学技术大学专场
Texas Tech University HSC 诚聘生物信息学、计算基因组学数据分析软件开发博士后数名
Texas Tech University HSC 诚聘生物信息学、计算基因组学数据分析软件开发博士后数名
想申欧洲二硕寻求建议
(2025 Fall)Opening PhD/Mphil positions香港科技大学申亚京课题组
分享找到的阿大和阿自由联培CS项目资料
悉尼大学计算机硕士专业录取标准调整，双非申请难度上升！
Duke MSEC项目就读体验（可能会继续更新）
UT Ausitn MA Econ 就读体验
开源了一份超全DIY申请总结攻略！来自24fall几十位学长学姐的礼物
BostonU MA Econ/MAEP/MAGDE项目杂谈
25fall欧陆留学申请详细时间线规划及关键点 timeline & tips
荷兰硕士DIY留学申请指南
港澳居住证+社保医保地税+银行卡改用回乡证登记
瑞典硕士DIY申请攻略之名校介绍——SU斯德哥尔摩大学
瑞典硕士DIY申请攻略之名校介绍——LU隆德大学/LTH隆德工学院
瑞典硕士DIY申请攻略之名校介绍——CTH查尔姆斯理工学院
瑞典硕士DIY申请攻略之名校介绍——KTH皇家理工学院
瑞典硕士DIY申请攻略——申请指南（完全版）
新加坡MBA（NUS, NTU, SMU）申请心得及攻略
经验分享：陆本商科跨专业申请文学录取Oxbridge
GMAT这么有用吗？跟大家讨论讨论我发小的年薪三级跳
巴政Sciences Po Econ Master 体验 & Placement
0
转发
转发该帖子
writing by TCWH
https://bbs.gter.net/thread-1252203-1-1.html
复制链接
发送
报offer 祈福 爆照
回顶部