- 最后登录
- 2011-8-1
- 在线时间
- 32 小时
- 寄托币
- 247
- 声望
- 5
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-20
- 阅读权限
- 15
- 帖子
- 1
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 266
- UID
- 2548370
![Rank: 2](template/archy_plt8/image/star_level2.gif)
- 声望
- 5
- 寄托币
- 247
- 注册时间
- 2008-9-20
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 1
|
TOPIC: ISSUE41 - "Such nonmainstream areas of inquiry as astrology, fortune-telling, and psychic and paranormal pursuits play a vital role in society by satisfying human needs that are not addressed by mainstream science."
WORDS: 520 TIME: 00:45:00 DATE: 2011/3/9 19:39:58
Nonmainstream areas of inquiry, refers to those areas cannot be explained by scientific theories or the knowledge we have obtained, on the contrast with mainstream science. The role of fortune-tellers exists in film or books about magic, which attracts readers or movie lovers' appetite. In this circumstance, without doubt it is a skill of advertising. But on some other aspects, astrology, another part of nonmainstream areas become a disciplinary with a large group of people spend time on it. I have to concede that nonmainstream areas such as astrology, fortune-telling are parts of our social life, but it still cannot act as the critical role in the face of sea of scientific knowledge.
The existence of nonmainstream has its own seeds. Astrology, some skills of forecasting the trend, is popular among people. With the study of the divining on stars can one get the information about the coming-events. In old fictions, we are familiar with the stories that military consulters use astrology to organize their armies and finally win the wars. Because no one can testify it, it is nature for those who are serious social-climbers to desire for actually acquiring information about their future. Besides, fortune-telling fulfills people's need of safety. Knowing their future means a clear direction to be followed and a quicker step to obtain competitive resources, with winning the game in the end.
On the social level, nonmainstream study concerning about soul or god while having not been explained by science seems to be full of mystery yet pushes the scientific research further. Studies about history of god spread the spirit of equality and love, which fuel some disciplinarians such as social work to develop.
However, the function of mainstream research cannot be ignored and replaced.
Those researches no matter they are dealing with economical issues or long-term environmental studies are all to meet the need of society. After research being applied to society and new invention being made, our life will be more convenient. Take some simple examples, without research on economical facts, we cannot know the laws of economy and use it to overcome crisis, beneficial to all poor people. In view of the recent world’s economic crisis, governments abide by laws and enacted effective policies to help recovery of market. Without long-term devotions into research on environmental issue, we cannot strike a balance between economical development and environmental protecting which are significant to survive of all human-beings. Without macro-level research about the universe, we cannot know the amusing of planets and how minute our human-being are. The plan of Apolo getting on the moon,..shocks all men to look outside of the earth and look forward to the living-lives on other possible planets. These coming-out cannot be achieved by nonmainstream research lack of serious testify methods. Some nonmainstream seem to be irrational and ridiculous because they are derived from inconvincible test
So in conclusion, mainstream research should continually carry on benefiting our human-beings. But , with the highly development of technology skills, those nonmainstream research will be recognized. Then with the narrow of the space of nonmainstream areas, mainstream parts would become stronger and the contain of our knowledge would larger.
Issue 17
16:20_17:07 574
Law, body of the official rules and regulations, develops as society evolves. Its original form appears with the primitive group called tribal. Before any courts or legislation come out, a tribal used a balance of customs, cultures or religion things to regulate their members. They often have the same kinship or a same god never to be sacrileged. When some one went against the whole tribal, he would get punishment from the god .If someone murdered or theft which went against the individual families, he and his family would be revenged by others according to the tribal customs. In our long history, law plays the role of striking the balance between interests among competing groups. So when it comes to the standards of law, problems seem to be complicated on the account of various interests. In my standpoint, law should insist on its objective standard and should be obeyed no matter what its natural is.
At the first threshold, the issue of whether law is just or unjust should be considered. How to define its nature? Different people have different views. Every law likes the coin, has two sides. The same kind of event which is confronted towards different groups may result in different views. Take a simple example, the American president Albert Lincoln signed the ABOLITION to free the slavery in South American. As a native American, Lincoln enacted the law representing the rights of slaveries and following the trend of emancipating yet largely going against the opinion of those capitalists. If standing on the point views of North capitalists, the law can never be implemented and will never help push the racial issue a further step. So I agree that law should depend on an objective standard rather than interests of groups. If so, law would lose its function of stabilizing the society, improving our efficiency and protecting the rights of every citizen.
Furthermore, as a citizen, we have to obey all laws that established. Without the obeying transportation regulations, everybody just drives the direction he likes, which would no doubt lead to giant traffic jams and increase the possibility of traffic accidents. Besides, as to the executives of laws, judges should no doubt carry on the law to achieve the relative fair of process and result.
Potential-regulation only ruins the social justice.
However, the process of making and enacting laws costs time which lead to the nature of hysteresis. With the development of high-technology, we face new kinds of events and troubles everyday. So it is possible that law doesn’t cover every problem and appear to be unfair especially to some groups. The once death penalty was extremely enacted. Yet in our democratic society, where the humanity is of the first consideration, death penalty should be reduced or eliminated. This arouses intense discussion among people owing to the hysteresis of law. The renewal of law is required by the whole society. In 1965, British established the Law Constitution to amend those laws which are out of step of current society. In short, the completeness of law needs time to amend and the best way is just to seek such legal organization to amend unfavorable laws.
To sum up, law balances various interests so that its objective nature must be insisted. Whether the law is perfect or unfavorable, we should be incumbent to obey it without proviso on the purpose that law would bring the well-order of our society. |
|