寄托家园留学论坛 › 论坛 › 寄托语言类备考版 › TOEFL考试(IBT)讨论版 › 小可米的作文帖

返回列表

查看: 1842|回复: 7

[未归类] 小可米的作文帖 [复制链接]

lavinia7479
UID: 3025869

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 467
注册时间: 2011-3-8
精华: 0
帖子: 5

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2011-5-7 21:45:32 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

小可米

回应
0

使用道具举报

lavinia7479
UID: 3025869

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 467
注册时间: 2011-3-8
精华: 0
帖子: 5

沙发

发表于 2011-5-7 21:46:53 |只看该作者

5.7 綜合
In the listening lecture, the speaker makes several points about replacement for the automobile’s main source of power. Although the reading passage contends that fule-cell engines have several advantage over internal-combustion engine and will probably soon replace them, she is against the viewpoint. To cast doubt on the main idea of the reading, the lecturer provides three key points that are respectively in contrast to those of the reading passage.

The first point that the lecturer uses to cast doubt on the reading passage is about the available. According to her, the fuel-cell engines are not easy available, and difficult to produce, as well as store. This differs from the counterpoint from the reading, which holds that the fule-cell engines utilize easily available, renewable resources makes them particularly attractive.

Another point that the lecturer uses to portray suspicion on the reading is about pollution. She claims that, because of produce hydrogen, it needs to burn corn and oil; therefore, it will make pollution. This contradicts the counterpoints from the reading, which maintains that hydrogen-based fuel cell will solve many of the world’s pollution problems.

The last point that the lecturer uses to challenge the reading passage is about the cost. She maintain that people need to spend more money by operate a fuel-cell engines than by an internal-combustion engines. Likewise, the denies the counterpoint from the reading, which also highlights that people will spend less money to operate a fule-cell engine.

In conclusion, as for replacement for the automobile’s main source of power, the listening lecturer completely refutes the main idea and its supporting points presented in the reading passage.

小可米

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报

tidus_xuan
UID: 172013

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 1
寄托币: 194
注册时间: 2004-7-29
精华: 0
帖子: 0

板凳

发表于 2011-5-9 08:31:10 |只看该作者

In the listening lecture, the speaker makes several points abouta
replacement for theautomobile’s main source of power. Although the reading passage contends thatfule-cell fuel
engines have several advantages over internal-combustionengines and will probably soon replace them, she is against theviewpoint. To cast doubt on the main idea of the reading, the lecturer providesthree key points that are respectively in contrast to those of the readingpassage.

The first point that the lecturer uses to cast doubt on thereading passage is about the available（availability）. According to her
lecture, the fuel-cell enginesare not easy easily available, and difficult to produce, as well as store. （难获得的不应该是fuel-cell engine，而是hydrogen）This differs from the counterpoint from the reading, which holdsthat the fule-cell fuel
engines utilize easily available, renewable resources makes themparticularly attractive.（语法错了，出现了utilize和makes两个动词，可以像文章里那样主语加个the fact，或者换making）

Another point that the lecturer uses to portray suspicion on in
the reading is aboutpollution. She claims that, because of produce hydrogen（语法错了，你的意思是for producing hydrogen吧）, it needs to burn corn（coal）and oil; therefore, itwill make pollution. （it needs和it will里两个it，指代不是很清晰）This contradicts the counterpoints（单数）from the reading, which maintains that hydrogen-based fuel cellwill solve many of the world’s pollution problems.

The last point that the lecturer uses to challenge the readingpassage is about the（去掉the） cost. She maintains that people need to spend more money by operate
a fuel-cell engines thanby an internal-combustion engines. （spend money + on doing/to do）Likewise, the denies（the denies?没看懂） the counterpoint from the reading, which also highlights（also highlights？可以去掉also，前面似乎没有highlight过什么）that people will spendless money to operate a fule-cell fuel engine.

In conclusion, as for a replacement for theautomobile’s main source of power, the listening lecturer completely refutesthe main idea and its supporting points presented in the reading passage.

写得还是不错的，结构对称，组织得也比较清晰

使用道具举报

lavinia7479
UID: 3025869

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 467
注册时间: 2011-3-8
精华: 0
帖子: 5

地板

发表于 2011-5-9 08:33:52 |只看该作者

3Q^^

小可米

使用道具举报

lavinia7479
UID: 3025869

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 0
寄托币: 467
注册时间: 2011-3-8
精华: 0
帖子: 5

5楼

发表于 2011-5-9 22:06:27 |只看该作者

5.9 TPO10 整合

In the listening lecture, the speaker makes several points about the sea otter population. Although the reading contends that the sea otter population started rapidly decline a few years ago, she is against the viewpoint. To cast doubt on the main ideal of the reading, the lecturer provides three key points that are respectively in contrast to those of the reading passage.

The first point that the lecturer uses to cast doubt on the reading passage is about weaken of pollution factor. According to her, the pollution factor is so weaken that even no one can find a dead sea otter. This differs from the counterpoint from the reading, which holds that the pollution that could decrease the sea otter population.

Another point that the lecturer uses to portray suspicion on the reading is about the human activity. She claims that human hunting cause decrease of whale’s population. Moreover, human could change the diet to hunt the sea otters. This contradicts the counterpoints from the reading, which maintains that the sea otter population decline will influence the other species, and pollution cause the sea otter’s population decline.

The last point that the lecturer uses to challenge the reading passage is the relationship between the sea otters, and the other species. She mentioned a species, which population is large. Because of it has large population, that species will not accessible to habitat on the location that sea otters located. Furthermore, the sea otter’s population still stable. Likewise, this denies the counterpoint from the reading, which also points out that the otter population declined greatly, but the others remain stable.

In conclusion, as far sea otter population, the listening lecture completely refutes the main idea and its supporting points presented in the reading passage.

小可米

使用道具举报

moonwmh
UID: 3073230

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 67
注册时间: 2011-5-8
精华: 0
帖子: 9

6楼

发表于 2011-5-9 22:09:43 |只看该作者

学习一下

吼吼

使用道具举报

郝郝同学
UID: 3024925

中级会员

Rank: 4

声望: 15
寄托币: 581
注册时间: 2011-3-7
精华: 0
帖子: 112

7楼

发表于 2011-5-10 21:25:58 |只看该作者

In the listening lecture, the speaker makes several points about the sea otter population. Although the reading contends that the sea otter population started rapidly decline a few years ago, she is against the viewpoint. To cast doubt on the main ideal of the reading, the lecturer provides three key points that are respectively（副词可以这样用？） in contrast to those of the reading passage.

The first point that the lecturer uses to cast doubt on the reading passage is about weaken（名词形式） of pollution factor. According to her（statement）, the pollution factor is so weaken（这个词是动词这里应该是形容词吧） that even no one can find a dead sea otter. This differs from the counterpoint from the reading, which holds that the pollution that could decrease the sea otter population.(

Another point that the lecturer uses to portray （这个词可以这样用？depict是不是好点）suspicion on the reading is about the human activity. She claims that human hunting cause decrease of whale’s population. Moreover, human could change the diet to hunt the sea otters. This contradicts the counterpoints from the reading, which maintains that the sea otter population decline will influence the other species, and pollution cause the sea otter’s population decline

The last point that the lecturer uses to challenge the reading passage is the relationship between the sea otters, and the other species. She mentioned a species, which population is large. Because of it has large population, that species will not accessible to habitat on the location that sea otters located. Furthermore, the sea otter’s population still stable. Likewise, this denies the counterpoint from the reading, which also points out that the otter population declined greatly, but the others remain stable.

In conclusion, as far sea otter population, the listening lecture completely refutes the main idea and its supporting points presented in the reading passage.

作者的听力内容写得不错
有些细节注意下就好

水平有限不妥之处望见谅~

使用道具举报