- 最后登录
- 2016-3-15
- 在线时间
- 1081 小时
- 寄托币
- 7618
- 声望
- 945
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-16
- 阅读权限
- 100
- 帖子
- 1165
- 精华
- 4
- 积分
- 4984
- UID
- 3130718
- 声望
- 945
- 寄托币
- 7618
- 注册时间
- 2011-7-16
- 精华
- 4
- 帖子
- 1165
|
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Two persons cannot be friends if one is richer than the other.
Recently, a controversial issue that has given rise to much debate is whether rich people could be friends with poor people. Now it seems that the rich always buy the luxury, go to the grand leisure places and have a high level life which give people an illusion that they cannot communicate with the poor, so won’t have friendship. Yet from my angle, I cling to an unshakable belief that there is true friendship between the rich and the poor.
First and foremost, the true friendship has nothing to do with wealth. Friendship derive from the appreciation, understanding and support between the two people. Generally, individuals who have the same hobby, same goal or same value will establish the friendship. They enjoy the hobby, pursue their goal and achieve their dream together. Gradually and eventually, the friendship between them is deeper and deeper. When they confront puzzles, they talk to each other; when they had to make decisions, they ask the other’s opinions; when they have achievements, they share the happiness with their friends. And all above are have little relation with money. I can think of no better illustration than the example of my best friend Chen Xinyao and me. I am a student from rural, and my parents are all famers. My friend Chen growing up in a wealth family, her parents are all merchants. However, we all love learning English, so we learn English together and practice oral English daily. So we become friends. And she always gives me little gifts, helps me to some housework. We cherish each other very much.
Also, every one has their own career and different development. If the one of the two friends has succeeded in career, he\she will become wealth. But the friendship between the two people won’t change. A case in point is that my mother and her friend are classmate in high school. After graduated, my mother went home did farm works, but her friend become a university student. Now her friend is a CFO in a multinational corporation. But during the decade, they always contact with each other, sometime they went to their high school together and they all feel happy. So I insist that the true friendship won’t be changed by money.
Granted, I concede that the rich may have a totally different life with the poor. But the friendship focuses more on spiritual than on the money. As long as two people appreciate each other, the gigantic wealth gap would not work.
Having considered all the arguments above, I reinforce my stand point that the rich can make friends with the poor. The true friendship has nothing to do with wealth.
版主点评:
1.Stand point:
回答了题目的问题:
Yet from my angle, I cling to an unshakable belief that there is true friendship between the rich and the poor.
无论贫富,两人只要有共同兴趣、目标、或者价值观,就可以建立一段友谊。
2. Organization
总论点:穷人和富人之间存在真正的友谊。
分论点一:无论贫富,两人只要有共同兴趣、目标、或者价值观,就可以建立一段友谊。
分论点二:每个人有各自的事业和不同的发展。
让步段:承认贫富世界的生活不同。
点评:作者的分论点一是很好的,说明友谊的基础是“志同”。 但是分论点二的问题很明显,没有阐明分论点二和总论点的直接关系。
建议:分论点二可以化作让步段的一个部分:即使经济差异可能是两个人的生活各有不同,但是这种不同不是鸿沟,而是互补。双方都可以了解到更多不同的文化和生活风格等等。
3. Development:
--分论点一 观点发展较好:用了排比句,以及一个具体例子。
--分论点二 观点发展不充分:所举的例子说服力不够。因为作者在举例时,只是说了我的妈妈和她的同学即使在后来的发展中各不相同,但是仍然是很好的朋友。并没有说为什么。
-- 让步段 发展薄弱。 建议和分论点二合并。
建议:作者可以这样充实分论点二:例如, 虽然妈妈是务农,而她的朋友在公司里工作,生活方式有很大变化,但是两个人总是能在不同的领域找到同样的兴趣。 务农的妈妈可以从朋友那了解多变的市场需求,而她的朋友,也可以从妈妈那获得大量的农村生产信息。这样,就能很好的发展论点,把例子具体化。 希望能抛砖引玉。
4. Language
句子连接问题:两个独立的句子不能用逗号连接,要么用句号,要么用连词,否则会造成run-on sentence.
The的用法: 特指冠词,慎用。一般来说,在前文没有涉及过某一般名词时。都用一般冠词 a. |
|