- 最后登录
- 2007-11-22
- 在线时间
- 0 小时
- 寄托币
- 1541
- 声望
- 0
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-1
- 阅读权限
- 25
- 帖子
- 2
- 精华
- 0
- 积分
- 840
- UID
- 2105710
- 声望
- 0
- 寄托币
- 1541
- 注册时间
- 2005-6-1
- 精华
- 0
- 帖子
- 2
|
下午刚好看了这篇范文,就顺道进来帮你看看
正文:(507)
With the flying development of the high technology, a new kind of recording tools has been invented. Its invention is a great impact to an old form of recording--written. And it causes a dispute about which kind of recording form is better. In my opinion, the video camera is fine in most sides.
The video camera provides convenience to contemporary's daily life. For example, when people go out for traveling, it is easy for them to carry a video camera and use the video camera to record every wonderful view and scene people see without omit(omitting) anything. And without tiring writing, everything is done by only pressing several keys. Once people want to review the places they had been before, they only need to press the play key. On the contrary, it is time consuming and tiring to bring a notebook to record dribs and drabs while traveling. Also it is more convenient to use video camera to record banquet, interview, etc.(方便这个点想得很好)
The video camera is not only convenient in record things, but also it can let people (feel personally?) on the scene for providing vivid dynamic pictures and music for people. Perhaps you have not been on the scene about a report, but when you watch a record noted by a video camera, the accurate and vivid picture will(最好改用would,could之类) let you personally? on the scene(在画面上吗?in the picture,on the screen). Or perhaps you have gone to the place several years ago, you only have abstract impression about the place, you will have the feeling of yesterday once more when play the record by video camera. Admittedly?(这里肯定CAMERA怎么来了个让步?), written records do not have such advantage.(观点很好,但好像没表述清楚咯~~)
The video camera is more objective and convincing in recording than written records in recording things.(要分清是什么类型的things,在这儿应说明,大事件的情景,场景等文字所不能清楚还原的) Written records are noted by people, and along with the different people with different opinion on one thing, the written records is different with personal sensation. It is hard to distinguish which is more dispassionate. To contrary, the video camera is more objective. Even though different people use it, it would not change the content and without any personal sensation. Due to the reason that the video camera has the function that record the thing accurate and objective, the content the video camera record is more convincing. Special for controversial historical affairs, such as political rebellion, the video camera is more objective and convincing for people to analyze the things.
Nonetheless, for certain aspects, written records are advantageous to and appropriate than video records. For example, a detailed contract is best left to a written document; Numbers in an account bill or an exact inquisitional table cannot described clearly by the video camera; And video is of little use when it comes to documenting a person's feeling, subjective state of mind of an event.
In sum, due to video camera's convenience in contemporary's daily life, its vivid dynamic images and impressive voices, its objective and convincing attitude on things, the video camera is considered a nicer(有点口语) documenting manner. However, it need written records(to) supply some aspect that video record not well.(这句得好好改改咯)
总得看来,这篇文章立场明确,结构安排得也合理,但是表达上应多多磨练,不然好观点也不能说明白啊!!加油!!!!!
欢迎来拍拍我的啊,谢谢!
https://bbs.gter.net/viewthre ... &extra=page%3D3 |
|