[习作点评] 【NINE小组】第6次作业-by ymxjtu [复制链接]

ymxjtu
UID: 2984484

寄托新兵

Rank: 2

声望: 0
寄托币: 167
注册时间: 2010-12-30
精华: 0
帖子: 5

电梯直达

楼主

发表于 2011-8-18 21:05:29 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览

55In order for any work of art –for example, afilm, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable tomost people.

Some people say we are living in a worldwith flourishing of manifold arts, for example, films, novel, poem, painting,carving, and so on, for wider acceptance and understanding of people. But someothers regard it as a disaster for the development of arts because of so manyjudging criterions imposing on the artistic work. In my opinion, I don’t thinkit reasonable to judge any artistic work by the extent of wide people’sunderstandings. The merit of a artistic work is decided by its creators oncethey are finished.

Admittedly, if a art work is moreunderstandable to most people, it usually show that this work is very popularand has an important influence on common people. From this view, it is safe tosay that this work is excellent. For example, Michael Jackson’s many songs arewidely accepted by the most world people because people love the notationsexpressed by their lyrics as well as rhythms. Numerous people changed theirlift routes positively influenced by Michael’s music. The greatly successfulunderstanding does
be a flashing meritof Michael’ music.

However, although people’s widelyunderstanding of the artistic work is to some extent meaningful, we can notconclude that in order to have merit for any art work, artists need to carterthe most people’s understanding level, or even their interests. I want to illustratemy view as follows.

Firstly, it is hard for artists to considerthe most people’s understanding ability to create their work. A love film maybe well accepted by the most of young people ranging 18-25 but not includingthe older adults older than 30, who may account for the most percent of thenational population. So, even it is not understandable by older people, it doesnot means the film’s failing in keeping its merit since many young peoplesupport it.

Secondly, if the artists always regard thewide acceptance and understanding as their creating principle, it may destroytheir create work. We all know that artistic work expresses the creator’soriginality from many different aspects about his views toward a event, athing, a person or others. When a artist consider most people’s understandingabilities, may the artist need to change his/her presentation form, such as theconstruction of a story, a sculptrue theme, the expressing methods and manyaspects, which may affect the art accomplishment or the real thinking in theartist work. For instance, if a write who is good at writing logical detectingnovel see the most people’s understanding as his writing norms, he may lost tobe attract people’s interests or even to be a third-class writer rather a outstandinglogical writer.

The last essential reason, in my opinion, itis the most excellent artists, such as novelists, painters, singers, filmmakers, and so on, who create the most important art by their own profoundly thinkingabout our all kinds of life for the a large part of common people. We, commonpeople, admire the intelligence present in the artist work and we are inspiredby them. And we acknowledge that the artists lead the art culture but not us. Therefore,it is necessary for the artist to create their work not regarding whether themost people understand it or not.

In conclusion, I think that it would behelpful to develop a more free society for the artists to do their work ratherthan opposing much more restrains on them likely considering the wideunderstanding of the most people.

相关帖子 Updated by 2024.11.08

2012 fall

回应
0

使用道具举报

winterfine
UID: 3141531

初级会员

Rank: 3 Rank: 3

声望: 0
寄托币: 279
注册时间: 2011-7-31
精华: 0
帖子: 2

沙发

发表于 2011-8-20 09:44:21 |只看该作者

本帖最后由 winterfine 于 2011-8-20 09:50 编辑

Issue修改

Some people say we are living in a world with flourishing of manifold arts, for example, films, novel, poem, painting, carving, and so on, for wider acceptance and understanding of people. But some others regard it as a disaster for the development of arts because of so many judging criterions imposing on the artistic work. In my opinion, I don’t think it reasonable to judge any artistic work by the extent of wide people’s understandings. The merit of a (an) artistic work is decided by its creators once they are finished.

Admittedly, if a (an) art work is more understandable to most people, it usually show that this work is very popular and has an important influence on common people. (被大多数人理解表明popular和important influence on common people吗？应该说前者是后者的必要条件吧) From this view, it is safe to say that this work is excellent. For example, Michael Jackson’s many songs are widely accepted by the most world people because people love the notations (我不太确定notation是否有抽象的意义) expressed by their lyrics as well as rhythms. Numerous people changed their lift routes (lift route是什么？) positively influenced by Michael’s music. The greatly successful understanding does be a flashing merit of Michael’ music.

对题目的正评价

However, although people’s widely (wide) understanding of the artistic work is to some extent meaningful, we can not conclude that in order to have merit for any art work, artists need to carter (cater to) the most people’s understanding level, or even their interests. I want to illustrate my view as follows.
负评价
Firstly, it is hard for artists to consider the most people’s understanding ability to create their work. A love film may be well accepted by the most of young people ranging 18-25 but not including the older adults older than 30, who may account for the most percent of the national population. So, even it is not understandable by older people, it does not means the film’s failing in keeping its merit since many young people support it.

Secondly, if the artists always regard the wide acceptance and understanding as their creating principle, it may destroy their create (creative) work. We all know that artistic work expresses the creator’s originality from many different aspects about his views toward a (an) event, a thing, a person or others. When a (an) artist consider most people’s understanding abilities, may the artist need to change his/her presentation form, such as the construction of a story, a sculptrue (sculpture) theme, the expressing methods and many aspects, which may affect the art accomplishment or the real thinking in the artist work. For instance, if a write who is good at writing logical detecting (detective) novel see the most people’s understanding as his writing norms, he may lost (lose) to be attract (这句有点乱) people’s interests or even to be a third-class writer rather a outstanding logical writer.
为什么侦探小说作家考虑了读者的理解就失败了？需要更清晰地说明

The last essential reason, in my opinion, it (去掉) is (that) the most excellent artists, such as novelists, painters, singers, filmmakers, and so on, who (去掉) create the most important art by their own profoundly thinking about our all kinds of life for the a large part of common people. We, common people, admire the intelligence present (presented) in the artist work and we are inspired by them. And we acknowledge that the artists lead the art culture but not us. Therefore, it is necessary for the artist to create their work not regarding whether the most people understand it or not.
“The artists lead the art culture but not us”
这个观点，一方面和上一段有部分重复，另外缺少更有力的论证。

In conclusion, I think that it would be helpful to develop a more free society for the artists to do their work rather than opposing much more restrains on them likely considering the wide understanding of the most people.

整篇文章两大部分：第二段是对题目的正评价；接下来转为负评价，并分了三个理由。有些部分论证不是很充分。

艺术的文章确实很难写…我也很头疼啊

【2025FALL】全站祈福已开放~~来领祈福章，求offer得offer

使用道具举报